Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-31T16:08:11.067Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Domain-general inhibition ability predicts the intensity of inhibition on non-target language in bilingual word production: An ERP study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2020

Chunyan Kang ,
Fengyang Ma ,
Shuhua Li ,
Judith F. Kroll  and
Taomei Guo
Chunyan Kang
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning & IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 10085, P. R. China Department of Psychology, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, 310018, P. R. China
Fengyang Ma
Affiliation:
School of Education, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH45221, USA
Shuhua Li
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning & IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 10085, P. R. China
Judith F. Kroll
Affiliation:
Department of Language Science, University of California, Irvine, CA92521, USA
Taomei Guo*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning & IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 10085, P. R. China Center for Collaboration and Innovation in Brain and Learning Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 10085, P. R. China
*
Address for correspondence: Taomei Guo, E-mail: guotm@bnu.edu.cn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study investigated the predictive effects of executive functions on bilingual language control processes. We used a flanker task, a switching task and an n-back task to investigate inhibition, shifting, and updating, respectively. We adopted a cued language switching task to investigate the language control processes during bilingual word production. Results of linear mixed effects models showed that picture naming in switch trials was significantly slower and elicited larger stimulus-locked N2 and N400-like components. The results further showed that the flanker effect alone robustly predicted the variability of the N2 but not N400-like switch effects. These findings suggest that domain-general inhibition appears to predict the intensity of inhibition exerted on the lexical items in the non-target language during bilingual word production, but bilingual language control only partially overlaps with executive functions.

Keywords

language controlexecutive functionsinhibitionERPlinear mixed effects modelbilingualism
Type
Research Article
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 23 , Issue 5 , November 2020 , pp. 1056 - 1069
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abutalebi, J, Guidi, L, Borsa, V, Canini, M, Della Rosa, PA, Parris, BA and Weekes, BS (2015) Bilingualism provides a neural reserve for aging populations. Neuropsychologia 69, 201–210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Antón, E, Duñabeitia, JA, Estévez, A, Hernández, JA, Castillo, A, Fuentes, LJ, Davidson, DJ and Carreiras, M (2014) Is there a bilingual advantage in the ANT task? Evidence from children. Frontiers in Psychology, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00398. Published online by Frontiers, May 7, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Afshartous, D and Preston, RA (2011) Key results of interaction models with centering. Journal of Statistics Education 19, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baus, C, Branzi, F and Costa, A (2015) On the mechanisms and scope of language control in bilingual speech production. In Schwieter, J.W.. (ed), The Cambridge Handbook of Bilingual Processing. Cambridge: Cambridge University press, pp. 508–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E (2011) Reshaping the mind: The benefits of bilingualism. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 65, 229–235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bialystok, E, Craik, FIM, Klein, R and Viswanathan, M (2004) Bilingualism, aging, and cognitive control: Evidence from the Simon task. Psychology & Aging 19, 290–303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bialystok, E, Craik, F and Luk, G (2008) Cognitive control and lexical access in younger and older bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 34, 859–873.Google ScholarPubMed
Bialystok, E, Craik, FIM and Luk, G (2012) Bilingualism: consequences for mind and brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 16, 240–250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blackford, T, Holcomb, PJ, Grainger, J and Kuperberg, GR (2012) A funny thing happened on the way to articulation: N400 attenuation despite behavioral interference in picture naming. Cognition 123, 84–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blom, E, Küntay, AC, Messer, M, Verhagen, J and Leseman, P (2014) The benefits of being bilingual: Working memory in bilingual Turkish-Dutch children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 128, 105–119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bobb, SC and Wodniecka, Z (2013) Language switching in picture naming: What asymmetric switch costs (do not) tell us about inhibition in bilingual speech planning. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 25, 568–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosma, E, Hoekstra, E, Versloot, A and Blom, E (2017) The minimal and short-lived effects of minority language exposure on the executive functions of Frisian-Dutch bilingual children. Frontiers in Psychology, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01453. Published online by Frontiers, August 29, 2017.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brydges, CR, Clunies-Ross, K, Clohessy, M, Lo, ZL, Nguyen, A, Rousset, C, Whitelaw, P, Yeap, YJ and Fox, AM (2012) Dissociable components of cognitive control: An event-related potential (ERP) study of response inhibition and interference suppression. Plos One, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034482. Published online by PLOS, March 28, 2012.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bunge, SA, Dudukovic, NM, Thomason, ME, Vaidya, CJ and Gabrieli, JDE (2002) Immature frontal lobe contributions to cognitive control in children: Evidence from fMRI. Neuron 33, 301–311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calabria, M, Branzi, FM, Marne, P, Hernández, M and Costa, A (2015) Age-related effects over bilingual language control and executive control. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 18, 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calabria, M, Hernández, M, Branzi, FM and Costa, A (2012) Qualitative differences between bilingual language control and executive control: Evidence from task-switching. Frontiers in Psychology, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00399. Published online by Frontiers, January 13, 2012.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calabria, M, Hernández, M, Martin, CD and Costa, A (2011) When the tail counts: The advantage of bilingualism through the ex-Gaussian distribution analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00250. Published online by Frontiers, October 3, 2011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chang, S, Xie, J, Li, L, Wang, R and Liu, M (2016) Switch costs occur at lemma stage when bilinguals name digits: Evidence from language-switching and event-related potentials. Frontiers in Psychology, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01249. Published online by Frontiers, August 31, 2016.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chatham, CH, Herd, SA, Brant, AM, Hazy, TEH, Miyake, A, O'Reilly, R and Friedman, NP (2011) From an executive network to executive control: A computational model of the n-back task. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23, 3598–3619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christoffels, IK, Firk, C and Schiller, NO (2007) Bilingual language control: An event-related brain potential study. Brain Research 1147, 192–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clare, L, Whitaker, CJ, Martyr, A, Martin-Forbes, PA, Bastable, AJM, Pye, KL, Quinn, C, Thomas, EM, Gathercole, VCM and Hindle, JV (2016) Executive control in older Welsh monolinguals and bilinguals. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 28, 412–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, A, Caramazza, A and Sebastian-Galles, N (2000) The cognate facilitation effect: Implications for models of lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 26, 1283–1296.Google ScholarPubMed
Costa, A, Hernández, M and Sebastián-Gallés, N (2008) Bilingualism aids conflict resolution: Evidence from the ANT task. Cognition 106, 59–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Costa, A and Santesteban, M (2004) Lexical access in bilingual speech production: Evidence from language switching in highly proficient bilinguals and L2 learners. Journal of Memory and Language 50, 491–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, A, Santesteban, M and Ivanova, I (2006) How do highly proficient bilinguals control their lexicalization process? Inhibitory and language-specific selection mechanisms are both functional. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 32, 1057–1074.Google ScholarPubMed
Declerck, M, Grainger, J, Koch, I and Philipp, AM (2017) Is language control just a form of executive control? Evidence for overlapping processes in language switching and task switching. Journal of Memory and Language 95, 138–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Declerck, M, Koch, I and Philipp, AM (2012) Digits vs. pictures: The influence of stimulus type on language switching. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 15, 896–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Declerck, M, Koch, I and Philipp, AM (2015) The minimum requirements of language control: Evidence from sequential predictability effects in language switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 41, 377–394.Google ScholarPubMed
Declerck, M and Philipp, AM (2015) A review of control processes and their locus in language switching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 22, 1630–1645.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Declerck, M and Philipp, AM (2017) Is there lemma-based language control? The influence of language practice and language-specific item practice on asymmetrical switch costs. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 32, 488–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duñabeitia, JA, Hernández, JA, Antón, E, Macizo, P, Estévez, A, Fuentes, LJ and Carreiras, M (2014) The inhibitory advantage in bilingual children revisited: Myth or reality? Experimental Psychology 61, 234–251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eriksen, BA and Eriksen, CW (1974) Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics 16, 143–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Festman, J, Rodriguez-Fornells, A and Münte, TF (2010) Individual differences in control of language interference in late bilinguals are mainly related to general executive abilities. Behavioral & Brain Functions 6, 5–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Folstein, JR and Van Petten, C (2008) Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: A review. Psychophysiology 45, 152–170.Google ScholarPubMed
Friedman, NP (2016) Research on individual differences in executive functions: Implications for the bilingual advantage hypothesis. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 6, 535–548.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedman, NP and Miyake, A (2004) The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: A latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 133, 101–135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gathercole, VCM, Thomas, EM, Kennedy, I, Prys, C, Yong, N, Guasch, NV, Roberts, EJ, Hughes, EK and Jones, L (2014) Does language dominance affect cognitive performance in bilinguals? Lifespan evidence from preschoolers through older adults on card sorting, Simon, and metalinguistic tasks. Frontiers in Psychology, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00011. Published online by Frontiers, February 5, 2014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gratton, G, Coles, MG and Donchin, E (1983) A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 55, 468–484.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, DW (1998) Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 1, 67–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, DW and Abutalebi, J (2013) Language control in bilinguals: The adaptive control hypothesis. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 25, 515–530.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gross, M and Kaushanskaya, M (2018) Contributions of nonlinguistic task-shifting to language control in bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 21, 181–194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guo, T, Ma, F and Liu, F (2013) An ERP study of inhibition of non-target languages in trilingual word production. Brain & Language 127, 12–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guo, T, Misra, M, Tam, JW and Kroll, JF (2012) On the time course of accessing meaning in a second language: An electrophysiological and behavioral investigation of translation recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 38, 1165–1186.Google Scholar
Haatveit, BC, Sundet, K, Hugdahl, K, Ueland, T, Melle, I and Andreassen, OA (2010) The validity of d prime as a working memory index: results from the “Bergen n-back task”. Journal of Clinical Experimental Neuropsychology 32, 871–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernández, M, Martin, CD, Barceló, F and Costa, A (2013) Where is the bilingual advantage in task-switching? Journal of Memory and Language 69, 257–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hübner, R and Töbel, L (2019) Conflict resolution in the Eriksen flanker task: Similarities and differences to the Simon task. Plos One, doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214203. Published online by PLOS, March 28, 2019.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackson, GM, Swainson, R, Cunnington, R and Jackson, SR (2001) ERP correlates of executive control during repeated language switching. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 4, 169–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jylkkä, J, Lehtonen, M, Lindholm, F, Kuusakoski, A and Laine, M (2018) The relationship between general executive functions and bilingual switching and monitoring in language production. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 21, 505–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kane, MJ, Conway, AR, Miura, TK and Colflesh, GJH (2007) Working memory, attention control, and the N-back task: A question of construct validity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 33, 615–622.Google ScholarPubMed
Kang, C, Ma, F and Guo, T (2018) The plasticity of lexical selection mechanism in word production: ERP evidence from short-term language switching training in unbalanced Chinese–English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 21, 296–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiesel, A, Steinhauser, M, Wendt, M, Falkenstein, M, Jost, K, Philipp, AM and Koch, I (2010) Control and interference in task switching-A review. Psychological Bulletin 136, 849–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirk, NW, Fiala, L, Scott-Brown, KC and Kempe, V (2014) No evidence for reduced Simon cost in elderly bilinguals and bidialectals. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 26, 640–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleinman, D and Gollan, TH (2016) Speaking two languages for the price of one: Bypassing language control mechanisms via accessibility-driven switches. Psychological science 27, 700–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopp, B, Rist, F and Mattler, U (1996) N200 in the flanker task as a neurobehavioral tool for investigating executive control. Psychophysiology 33, 282–294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kousaie, S & Phillips, NA (2012a) Ageing and bilingualism: Absence of a “bilingual advantage” in Stroop interference in a nonimmigrant sample. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 65, 356–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kousaie, S and Phillips, NA (2012b) Conflict monitoring and resolution: Are two languages better than one? Evidence from reaction time and event-related brain potentials. Brain research 1446, 71–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroll, JF and Bialystok, E (2013) Understanding the consequences of bilingualism for language processing and cognition. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 25, 497–514.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kroll, JF, Bobb, SC, Misra, M and Guo, T (2008) Language selection in bilingual speech: Evidence for inhibitory processes. Acta Psychologica 128, 416–430.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuznetsova, A, Brockhoff, PB and Christensen, RHB (2017) lmerTest Package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software 82, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linck, JA, Schwieter, JW and Sunderman, G (2012) Inhibitory control predicts language switching performance in trilingual speech production. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 15, 651–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, H, Fan, N, Rossi, S, Yao, P and Chen, B (2016a) The effect of cognitive flexibility on task switching and language switching. International Journal of Bilingualism 20, 563–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, H, Liang, L, Dunlap, S, Fan, N and Chen, B (2016b) The effect of domain-general inhibition-related training on language switching: An ERP study. Cognition 146, 264–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, H, Rossi, S, Zhou, H and Chen, B (2014) Electrophysiological evidence for domain-general inhibitory control during bilingual language switching. Plos One, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110887. Published online by PLOS, October 24, 2014.Google ScholarPubMed
Luk, G, Anderson, JAE, Craik, FIM, Grady, C and Bialystok, E (2010) Distinct neural correlates for two types of inhibition in bilinguals: Response inhibition versus interference suppression. Brain & Cognition 74, 347–357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ma, F, Chen, P, Guo, T and Kroll, JF (2017) When late second language learners access the meaning of L2 words: Using ERPs to investigate the role of the L1 translation equivalent. Journal of Neurolinguistics 41, 50–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, F, Li, S and Guo, T (2016) Reactive and proactive control in bilingual word production: An investigation of influential factors. Journal of Memory and Language 86, 35–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfield, KL, van der Molen, MW, Falkenstein, M and van Boxtel, GJ (2013) Temporal dynamics of interference in Simon and Eriksen tasks considered within the context of a dual-process model. Brain and cognition 82, 353–363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin-Rhee, MM and Bialystok, E (2008) The development of two types of inhibitory control in monolingual and bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 11, 81–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meule, A (2017) Reporting and interpreting working memory performance in n-back tasks. Frontiers in psychology, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00352. Published online by Frontiers, March 7, 2017.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meuter, RFI and Allport, A (1999) Bilingual language switching in naming: Asymmetrical costs of language selection. Journal of Memory and Language 40, 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyake, A, Friedman, NP, Emerson, MJ, Witzki, AH, Howerter, A and Wager, TD (2000) The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “Frontal Lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology 41, 49–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monsell, S (2003) Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7, 134–140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morales, J, Calvo, A and Bialystok, E (2013) Working memory development in monolingual and bilingual children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 114, 187–202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morton, JB and Harper, SN (2007) What did Simon say? Revisiting the bilingual advantage. Developmental Science 10, 719–726.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Brien, RM (2007) A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quantity 41, 673–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, AM, McMillan, KM, Laird, AR and Bullmore, E (2005) N-back working memory paradigm: a meta-analysis or normative functional neuroimaging. Human Brain Mapping 25, 46–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paap, KR and Greenberg, ZI (2013) There is no coherent evidence for a bilingual advantage in executive processing. Cognitive Psychology 66, 232–258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paap, KR, Johnson, HA and Sawi, O (2014) Are bilingual advantages dependent upon specific tasks or specific bilingual experiences? Journal of Cognitive Psychology 26, 615–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paap, KR, Johnson, HA and Sawi, O (2015) Bilingual advantages in executive functioning either do not exist or are restricted to very specific and undetermined circumstances. Cortex 69, 265–278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paap, KR, Myuz, HA, Anders, RT, Bockelman, MF, Mikulinsky, R and Sawi, OM (2017) No compelling evidence for a bilingual advantage in switching or that frequent language switching reduces switch cost. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 29, 89–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paap, KR and Sawi, O (2014) Bilingual advantages in executive functioning: Problems in convergent validity, discriminant validity, and the identification of the theoretical constructs. Frontiers in Psychology, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00962. Published online by Frontiers, September 9, 2014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Philipp, AM, Gade, M and Koch, I (2007) Inhibitory processes in language switching: Evidence from switching language-defined response sets. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 19, 395–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prior, A and Gollan, TH (2011) Good language-switchers are good task-switchers: Evidence from Spanish-English and Mandarin-English bilinguals. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 17, 682–691.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prior, A and Gollan, TH (2013) The elusive link between language control and executive control: A case of limited transfer. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 25, 622–645.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prior, A and Macwhinney, B (2010) A bilingual advantage in task switching. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 13, 253–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team (2017) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/.Google Scholar
Robinson, C and Schumacker, RE (2009) Interaction effects: Centering, variance inflation factor, and interpretation issues. Multiple Linear Regression Viewpoints 35, 6–11.Google Scholar
Rogers, RD and Monsell, S (1995) Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 124, 207–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, SB, Aristei, S, Melinger, A and Abdel Rahman, R (2018) The closer they are, the more they interfere: Semantic similarity of word distractors increases competition in language production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, doi: 10.1037/xlm0000592. Published online by American Psychological Association, July 5, 2018.Google ScholarPubMed
Snodgrass, JG and Vanderwart, M (1980) A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 6, 174–215.Google ScholarPubMed
Spalek, K, Hoshino, N, Wu, YJ, Damian, M and Thierry, G (2014) Speaking two languages at once: Unconscious native word form access in second language production. Cognition 133, 226–231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Struys, E, Woumans, E, Nour, S, Kepinska, O and Van den Noort, M (2019) A domain-general monitoring account of language switching in recognition tasks: Evidence for adaptive control. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 22, 606–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Surrain, S and Luk, G (2019) Describing bilinguals: A systematic review of labels and descriptions used in the literature between 2005–2015. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 22, 401–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tao, L, Taft, M and Gollan, TH (2015) The bilingual switching advantage: Sometimes related to bilingual proficiency, sometimes not. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 21, 531–544.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thierry, G and Wu, YJ (2007) Brain potentials reveal unconscious translation during foreign-language comprehension. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104, 12530–12535.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Timmer, K, Calabria, M and Costa, A (2019) Non-linguistic effects of language switching training. Cognition 182, 14–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valian, V (2015) Bilingualism and cognition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 18, 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Hell, JG and Kroll, JF (2013) Using electrophysiological measures to track the mapping of words to concepts in the bilingual brain: A focus on translation. In Altarriba, J and Isurin, L. (eds), Memory, language, and bilingualism: Theoretical and applied approaches. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 126–160.Google Scholar
Vandierendonck, A, Liefooghe, B and Verbruggen, F (2010) Task switching: Interplay of reconfiguration and interference control. Psychological Bulletin 136, 601–626.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verhoef, K, Roelofs, A and Chwilla, DJ (2009) Role of inhibition in language switching: Evidence from event-related brain potentials in overt picture naming. Cognition 110, 84–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verhoef, KMW, Roelofs, A and Chwilla, DJ (2010) Electrophysiological evidence for endogenous control of attention in switching between languages in overt picture naming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 22, 1832–1843.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Von Bastian, CC, Souza, AS and Gade, M (2016) No evidence for bilingual cognitive advantages: A test of four hypotheses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 145, 246–258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weissberger, GH, Wierenga, CE, Bondi, MW and Gollan, TH (2012) Partially overlapping mechanisms of language and task control in young and older bilinguals. Psychology & Aging 27, 959–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, B (2013) Linear models and linear mixed effects models in R with linguistic applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:1308.5499. http://arxiv.org/pdf/1308.5499.pdf.Google Scholar
Wu, YJ and Thierry, G (2010) Chinese–English bilinguals reading English hear Chinese. Journal of Neuroscience 30, 7646–7651.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, YJ and Thierry, G (2012) How reading in a second language protects your heart. Journal of Neuroscience 32, 6485–6489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, YJ and Thierry, G (2013) Fast modulation of executive function by language context in bilinguals. Journal of Neuroscience 33, 13533–13537.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, Q and Yang, Y (2003) The determiners of picture naming latency. Acta Psychologica Sinica 35, 447-454.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Kang et al. supplementary material

Table S1

Download Kang et al. supplementary material(File)
File 52.2 KB