Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-15T19:11:10.026Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mood and global-local visual processing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2009

Michael R. Basso ,
Bruce K. Schefft ,
M. Douglas Ris  and
William N. Dember
Michael R. Basso
Affiliation:
Neuropsychology Laboratory, The Ohio State University
Bruce K. Schefft
Affiliation:
University of Cincinnati
M. Douglas Ris
Affiliation:
Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
William N. Dember
Affiliation:
University of Cincinnati
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Testing hypotheses derived from neuropsychological models of mood, as well as the association of mood states and personality characteristics with global-local visual processing, were examined. Fifty-nine men completed measures associated with depression and positive mood, and were administered a brief perceptual judgment task that assessed global-local visual processing biases. Additionally, 19 of these 59 subjects were administered measures of anxiety and optimism-pessimism and completed an expanded judgment task. Affective and personality variables were then correlated with judgment task performances. Consistent with predictions, positive mood and optimism were directly associated with a global bias and inversely related to a local bias. A converse pattern of findings was obtained with depression and trait anxiety. Implications for research concerning other aspects of visual processing are discussed. (JINS, 1996, 2, 249–255.)

Keywords

MoodGlobal-local visual processing
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society , Volume 2 , Issue 3 , May 1996 , pp. 249 - 255
Copyright
Copyright © The International Neuropsychological Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beck, A.T., Ward, C.H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., & Erbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 561–571.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, H.D. & Kosslyn, S.M. (1995). Hemispheric differences in visual object processing: Structural versus allocation theories. In Davidson, R. & Hugdahl, K. (Eds.), Brain asymmetry (pp. 77–97). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bruder, G.E. (1995). Cerebral laterality and psychopathology: Perceptual and event-related potential asymmetries in affective and schizophrenic disorders. In Davidson, R. & Hugdahl, K. (Eds.), Brain asymmetry (pp. 661–691). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Costa, P. & McCrae, R. (1985). The NEO personality inventory manual. Odessa, Florida: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Davidson, R.J. (1992). Anterior cerebral asymmetry and the nature of emotion. Brain and Cognition, 20, 125–151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davidson, R.J. (1993). Cerebral asymmetry and emotion: Conceptual and methodological conundrums. Cognition and Emotion, 7, 115–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, R.J., Schaffer, C.E., & Saron, C. (1985). Effects of lateralized presentations of faces on self-reports of emotion and EEG asymmetry in depressed and non-depressed subjects. Psychophysiology, 22, 353–364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davidson, R.J. & Tomarken, A.J. (1989). Laterality and emotion: An electrophysiological approach. In Boller, F. & Grafman, J. (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology, Vol. 3 (pp. 419–441). New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Delis, D.C., Kiefner, M.G., & Fridlund, A.J. (1988). Visuospatial dysfunction following unilateral brain damage: Dissociations in hierarchical and hemispatial analysis. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 10, 421–431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delis, D.C., Robertson, L.C., & Efron, R. (1986). Hemispheric specialization of memory for visual hierarchical stimuli. Neuropsychologia, 24, 205–214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deptula, D., Manevitz, A., & Yozawitz, A. (1991). Asymmetry of recall in depression. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 13, 854–870.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diener, E., Emmons, R.A., Larsen, R.J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eysenck, H. & Eysenck, M. (1985). Personality and individual differences: A natural science approach. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gainotti, G., Caltagirone, C., & Zoccolotti, P. (1993). Left/right and cortical/subcortical dichotomies in the neuropsychological study of human emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 7, 71–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henriques, J.B. & Davidson, R.J. (1990). Regional brain electrical asymmetries discriminate between previously depressed and healthy control subjects. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 99, 22–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henriques, J.B. & Davidson, R.J. (1991). Left frontal hypoactivation in depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 535–545.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, A.B., Kemp-Wheeler, S.M., & Jones, S.A. (1986). What does the Beck Depression Inventory measure in students? Personality and Individual Differences, 7, 39–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimchi, R. (1992). Primacy of wholistic processing and global/ local paradigm: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 24–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kimchi, R. & Palmer, S.E. (1982). Form and texture in hierarchically constructed patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 521–535.Google ScholarPubMed
Kinsbourne, M. (1988). Hemisphere interactions in depression. In Kinsbourne, M. (Ed.), Cerebral hemisphere function in depression (pp. 133–162). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.Google Scholar
Kitterle, F.L., Christman, S., & Hellige, J.B. (1990). Hemispheric differences are found in the identification, but not detection of low vs. high spatial frequencies. Perception and Psychophysics, 48, 297–306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kitterle, F.L. & Selig, L.M. (1991). Visual field effects in the discrimination of sine-wave gratings. Perception and Psychophysics, 50, 15–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koffka, K. (1963). Principles of Gestalt psychology. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & World.Google Scholar
Kohler, W. (1929). Gestalt psychology. New York: Liveright.Google Scholar
Kramer, J.H., Kaplan, E., Blusewicz, M.J., & Preston, K.A. (1991). Visual hierarchical analysis of Block Design configural errors. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 13, 455–465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ladavas, E., Nicoletti, R., & Rizzolatti, G. (1984). Right hemisphere interference during negative affect: A reaction time study. Neuropsychologia, 22, 479–485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lamb, M.R., Robertson, L.C., & Knight, R.T. (1990). Component mechanisms underlying the processing of hierarchically organized patterns: Inferences from patients with unilateral cortical lesions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 471–483.Google ScholarPubMed
Larsen, R.J. & Diener, E. (1987). Affect intensity as an individual difference characteristic: A review. Journal of Research in Personality, 21, 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, J., Heller, W., Banich, M.T., & Burton, L.A. (1983). Are variations among right-handed individuals in perceptual asymmetries caused by characteristic arousal differences between hemispheres? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 329–359.Google ScholarPubMed
Liotti, M., Sava, D., Rizzolatti, G., & Caffara, P. (1991). Differential hemispheric asymmetries in depression and anxiety: A reaction-time study. Biological Psychiatry, 29, 887–899.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGlone, J. (1980). Sex differences in brain asymmetry: A critical survey. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 215–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oldfield, R.C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97–113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pavot, W. & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Psychological Assessment, 5, 164–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, L.C. (1992). Perceptual organization and attentional search in cognitive deficits. In Margolin, D. I. (Ed.), Cognitive neuropsychology in clinical practice (pp. 70–95). New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Robertson, L.C. & Delis, D.C. (1986). “Part-whole” processing in unilateral brain damaged patients: Dysfunction of hierarchical organization. Neuropsychologia, 24, 363–370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robertson, L.C., Lamb, M.R., & Knight, R.T. (1988). Effects of lesions of temporal-parietal junction on perceptual and attentional processing in humans. Journal of Neurosciences, 8, 3757–3769.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, R.G., Kubos, K.L., Starr, L.B., Rao, K., & Price, T.R. (1984). Mood disorders in stroke patients: Importance of location of lesion. Brain, 107, 81–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scheier, M.F. & Carver, C.S. (1985). Optimism, coping, and health: Assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies. Health Psychology, 4, 219–247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sergent, J. (1985). Influence of task and input factors on hemispheric involvement in face processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 846–861.Google ScholarPubMed
Shapiro, D. (1965). Neurotic styles. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
Spielberger, C.D. (1977). The state-trait anxiety inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists’ Press.Google Scholar
Stevens, J. (1985). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Hillsdale, NJ.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Tomarken, A.J., Davidson, R.J., & Henriques, J.B. (1990). Resting frontal brain asymmetry predicts affective responses to films. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 791–801.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tucker, D.M. (1988). Neuropsychological mechanisms of affective self-regulation. In Kinsbourne, M. (Ed.), Cerebral hemisphere function in depression (pp. 99–132). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.Google Scholar
Tucker, D.M. & Derryberry, D. (1992). Motivated attention: Anxiety and the frontal executive functions. Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology, and Behavioral Neurology, 5, 233–252.Google Scholar
Tucker, D.M., Stenslie, C.E., Roth, R.S., & Shearer, S. (1981). Right frontal lobe activation and right hemisphere performance decrement during a depressed mood. Archives of General Psychiatry, 38, 169–174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tyler, S.K. & Tucker, D.M. (1981). Anxiety and perceptual structure: Individual differences in neuropsychological function. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 91, 210–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Kleeck, M.H. (1989). Hemispheric differences in global versus local processing of hierarchical visual stimuli by normal subjects: New data and a meta-analysis of previous studies. Neuropsychologia, 27, 1165–1178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, D., Clark, L.A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watson, D. & Tellegen, A. (1985). Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 219–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wertheimer, M. (1967). Gestalt theory. In Ellis, W.D. (Ed.), A source book of Gestalt psychology (pp. 1–11). New York: Humanities Press.Google Scholar