Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T18:45:30.244Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Anxiety and Interpretation of Ambiguous Events in the Postnatal Period: An Exploratory Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2007

Fiona Challacombe
Affiliation:
Royal Free and University College Medical School, London, UK
Pia Feldmann
Affiliation:
Tavistock & Portman NHS Trust, London, UK
Annukka Lehtonen
Affiliation:
University of Oxford, UK
Michelle G. Craske
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles, USA
Alan Stein
Affiliation:
University of Oxford, UK

Abstract

There is now considerable evidence that anxiety disorders aggregate in families. Whilst genetic heritability plays a part, environmental factors are another factor explaining this aggregation. However, little is known about the cognitive mechanisms involved. This study examined maternal attentional focus as a possible mechanism in a community sample of mothers of young infants, using an ambiguous scenarios paradigm. In particular, we examined whether more anxious mothers were more likely to interpret everyday scenarios concerning their young children as more threatening and whether this affected their predictions of their own reactions to the situations. Anxiety scores were associated with a greater likelihood of anxious interpretation in first-time mothers but not in the whole sample. Mothers who scored higher on state and trait anxiety were found to perceive ambiguous scenarios involving infants as more threatening than mothers scoring lower on anxiety and were more likely to indicate that they would seek external reassurance. These relationships were stronger when data were only analysed for the sub-group of first-time mothers. This suggests that anxious interpretations by the mother may ultimately influence the child's assessment of and response to threat. However, direct observational research is needed to examine this issue.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2007 British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

An extended version is also available online in the table of contents for this issue: http://journals.cambridge.org/jid_BCP
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.