Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-29T17:06:13.843Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Behavioural Analysis: Does It Matter?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2009

Dietmar Schulte
Dietmar Schulte
Affiliation:
Ruhr-Unversität Bochum, Germany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Behavioural or, in more general terms, problem analysis is usually regarded as the prerequisite of behaviour therapy. In behaviour therapy research, however, problem analysis does not play a key role. Patients are usually assigned to treatment methods on the basis of clinical diagnosis. It could be assumed that the lack of attention to the patient's individual characteristics should lead to poorer therapy outcome results. However, empirical data of a project reviewed in this paper in fact showed that assigning patients to standard treatment merely on the basis of clinical diagnoses provides results equal to or even better than those of optimized individual therapy strategies. Two premises of problem analysis were therefore tested. It could be shown that therapists would diagnose different problem conditions not only for patients with different types of phobia, but also, as expected, for patients with identical diagnoses. However, this did not—as would be expected according to the second premise of problem analysis—result in choosing different individual therapy strategies. One reason for these findings could be that behaviour therapy research has been able to provide treatment programs that have been differentiated and gradually optimized for specific diagnostic groups. To decide on the application of these treatment programs, clinical diagnoses are necessary. It is suggested that clinical diagnosis and problem analysis should be complementary. An integrative model is suggested.

Type
Research Article
Information
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , July 1997 , pp. 231 - 249
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bartling, G., Echelmeyer, L., Engberding, M., & Krause, R. (1980). Problem analyse im therapeutischen Prozeβ. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
Beutler, L. E., Crago, M., & Arizmendi, T. G. (1986). Research on therapist variables in psychotherapy (3rd edition). In Garfield, S. L. & Bergin, A. E. (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (pp. 257–310). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Cautela, J. R. & Upper, D. (1975). The process of individual behavior therapy. In Hersen, M., Eisler, R. M., & Miller, P. M. (Eds.), Progress in behavior modification. Vol. I. (pp. 276–305). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ciminero, A. R., Calhoun, K. S., & Adams, H. E. (Eds.) (1977). Handbook of behavioral assessment. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Cone, J. D. & Hawkins, R. P. (Eds.) (1977). Behavioral assessment. New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
Eifert, G. H. & Evans, I. M. (Eds.) (1990). Unifying behavior therapy. Contributions of paradigmatic behaviorism. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Eifert, G. H., Evans, I. M., & McKendrick, V. G. (1990). Matching treatments to client problems not diagnostic labels: A case for paradigmatic behavior therapy. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 21, 163–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmelkamp, P. M. G., Bouman, T. K., & Blaauw, E. (1994). Individualized versus standardized therapy: A comparative evaluation with obsessive-compulsion patients. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 1, 95–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldfried, M. R. & Sprafkin, J. N. (1974). Behavioral personality assessment. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.Google Scholar
Grawe, K. & Dziewas, H., (1978). Interaktionelle Verhaltenstherapie. In Deutsche Gesellschaft für Verhaltenstherapie (Hrsg.), Fortschritte der Verhaltenstherapie. Kongreβbericht Berlin 1977, Bd. 1 (pp. 27–49). Tübingen: DGVT.Google Scholar
Hay, W. M., Hay, L. R., Angle, H. V., & Nelson, R. O. (1979). The reliability of problem identification in the behavioral interview. Behavioral Assessment, 1, 107–118.Google Scholar
Hayes, S. C., Nelson, R. O., & Jarret, R. B. (1987). The treatment utility of assessment: A functional approach to evaluating assessment quality. American Psychologist, 42, 963–974.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haynes, S. N. (1978). Principles of behavioral assessment. New York: Gardner.Google Scholar
Hersen, M. (1979). Limitations and problems in the clinical application of behavioral techniques in psychiatric settings. Behavior Therapy, 10, 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hersen, M. & Bellack, A. S. (Eds.) (1976). Behavioral assessment: A practical handbook. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Howard, G. S., Nance, D. W., & Myers, P. (1986). Adaptive counseling and therapy: An integrative, eclectic model. The Counseling Psychologist, 14, 363–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, N. S., Schmaling, K. B., Holtzworth-Munroe, A., Katt, J. L., Wood, L. F., & Follette, V. M. (1989). Research-structured versus clinically flexible versions of social learning-based marital therapy. Behavior Research and Therapy, 27, 173–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jerremalm, A., Jansson, L., & Öst, L.-G. (1986). Cognitive and physiological reactivity and the effects of different behavioral methods in the treatment of social phobia. Behavior Research and Therapy, 24, 171–180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kanfer, F. H. & Grimm, L. G. (1977). Behavioral analysis: Selecting target behaviors in the interview. Behavior Modification, 1, 7–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanfer, F. H. & Nay, R. (1982). Behavioral assessment: Toward an integration of epistemological and methodological issues. In Franks, C. M. & Wilson, G. T. (Eds.), Behavior therapy and its foundations. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Kanfer, F. H. & Saslow, G. (1965). Behavioral analysis. Archives of General Psychiatry, 12, 529–538.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kanfer, F. H. & Saslow, G. (1969). Behavioral diagnosis. In Franks, C. M. (Ed.), Behavior therapy (pp. 417–444). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Kazdin, A. E. (1985). Selection of target behaviors: The relationship of the treatment focus to clinical dysfunction. Behavioral Assessment, 7, 33–47.Google Scholar
Kazdin, A. E., Kratochwill, T. R., & Van Den Bos, G. R. (1986). Beyond clinical trials: Generalizing from research to practice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 17, 391–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazarus, A. A. (1971). Behavior therapy and beyond. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Levine, F. M., Sandeen, E., & Murphy, C. M. (1992). The therapist's dilemma: Using nomothetic information to answer idiographic questions. Psychotherapy, 50, 242–243.Google Scholar
Liberman, R. P. (1979). To each his own: Individualizing treatment strategies for depressed persons(Paper, presented at the NIMH Conference on Research Recommendations for the Behavioral Treatment of Depression).Pittsburg, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Manns, M., Schultze, J., Herrmann, C., & Westmeyer, H. (1987). Beobachtungsverfahren in der Verhaltensdiagnostik. Salzburg: Otto Müller Verlag.Google Scholar
Mash, E. J. & Terdal, L. G. (Eds.) (1976) Behavior therapy assessment. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Mersch, P. P. A., Emmelkamp, P. M. G., Bögels, S. M., & Sleen, J. Van Der (1989). Social phobia: Individual response patterns and the effects of behavioral and cognitive interventions. Behavior Research and Therapy, 27, 421–434.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meyer, V. & Turkat, I. D. (1979). Behavioral analysis of clinical cases. Journal of Behavioral Assessment, 1, 259–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, G. A. (1969). A psychological method to investigate verbal concepts. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 6, 169–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, R. O. & Hayers, S. C. (1979). Some current dimensions of behavioral assessment. Behavioral Assessment, 1, 1–16.Google Scholar
Nelson-Gray, R. O., Herbert, J. D., Herbert, D. L., Sigmon, S. T., & Brannon, S. E. (1989). Effectiveness of matched, mismatched, and package treatments of depression. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 20, 281–294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Persons, J. B. (1991). Psychotherapy outcome studies do not accurately represent current models of psychotherapy: A proposed remedy. American Psychologist, 46, 99–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rude, S. S. & Rehm, L. P. (1991). Response to treatments for depression: The role of initial status on targeted cognitive and behavioral skills. Clinical Psychological Review, 11, 493–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulte, D. (1973). Der diagnostisch-therapeutische Prozeβ in der Verhaltenstherapie. In Brengelmann, J. C. & Tunner, W. (Eds.), Behavior therapy—Verhaltenstherapie (pp. 28–39). München: Urban und Schwarzenberg.Google Scholar
Schulte, D. (1974). Ein Schema für Diagnose und Therapieplanung in der Verhaltenstherapie. In Schulte, D. (Ed.), Diagnostik in der Verhaltenstherapie (pp. 75–104). München: Urban und Schwarzenberg.Google Scholar
Schulte, D. (1976). Psychodiagnostik zur Erklärung und Modifikation von Verhalten. In Pawlik, K. (Ed.), Diagnose der Diagnostik (pp. 149–176). Stuttgart: Klett.Google Scholar
Schulte, D (1981). Schema für Problemanalyse und Therapieplanung. Bochum Maschinenschrift.Google Scholar
Schulte, D. (1986). Verhaltenstherapeutische Diagnostik. In Deutsche Gesellschaft für Verhaltenstherapie (Eds.), Verhaltenstherapie—Theorien und Methoden (pp. 16–42). Tübingen: DGVT.Google Scholar
Schulte, D (1996). Therapieplanung. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
Schulte, D., Groeger, W., Raschdorf, D., & Schulte-Bahrenberg, T. (1986). Individuelle Therapieplanung versus Standardtherapie. Zwischenbericht Nr. 1 zum DFG-Projekt Schu 358/2–1, 2. Bochum. Unveröffentlichter Bericht.Google Scholar
Schulte, D., Künzel, R., Pepping, G., & Schulte-Bahrenberg, T. (1991). MaBgeschneiderte Psychotherapie versus Standardtherapie bei der Behandlung von Phobikern. In Schulte, D. (Ed.), Therapeutische Entscheidungen (pp. 15–42). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
Schulte, D., Künzel, R., Pepping, G., & Schulte-Bahrenberg, T. (1992). Tailormade versus standardized therapy of phobic patients. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 14, 67–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulte, D. & Wittchen, H.-U. (1988). Wert und Nutzen klassifikatorischer Diagnostik für die Psychotherapie. Diagnostica, 34, 85–98.Google Scholar
Stuart, R. B. (1970). Trick or treatment: How and when psychotherapy fails. Champaign, Ill.: Research Press.Google Scholar
Trull, T. J., Nietzel, M. T., & Main, A. (1988). The use of metaanalysis to assess the clinical significance of behavior therapy for agoraphobia. Behavior Therapy, 19, 527–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turkat, I.D. (1988). Issues in the relationship between assessment and treatment. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 10, 185–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turkat, I. D. & Meyer, V. (1982). The behavior-analytic approach. In Wachtel, P. L. (Ed.), Resistance: Psychodynamic and behavioral approaches (pp. 157–184). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, G. & Schulte, D. (1991). Der Prozeβ therapeutischer Entscheidungen. In Schulte, D. (Ed.), Therapeutische Entscheidungen (pp. 151–180). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
Wilson, F. E. & Evans, I. M. (1983). The reliability of target-behavior selection in behavioral assessment. Behavioral Assessment, 5, 15–32.Google Scholar
Wilson, G. T. (1996). Manual-based treatments: The clinical application of research findings. Behavior Research and Therapy, 34, 295–314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wittchen, H.-U. & Schulte, D. (1988). Diagnostische Kriterien und Operationalisierte Diagnosen. Grundlagen der Klassifikation psychischer Störungen. Diagnostica, 3, 3–27.Google Scholar
Wolpe, J. (1977). Inadequate behavior analysis: The Achilles heel of outcome research in behavior therapy. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 8, 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolpe, J. (1986). Individualization: The categorical imperative of behavior therapy practice. Journal of Behavior Research and Experimental Psychiatry, 17, 145–153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolpe, J. (1989). The derailment of behavior therapy: A tale of conceptual misdirection. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 20, 3–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.