Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T06:16:50.271Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Attachment Style and Adjustment to Divorce

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2013

Sagrario Yárnoz-Yaben*
Affiliation:
Universidad del País Vasco (Spain)
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Sagrario Yárnoz-Yaben. Facultad de Psicología. Avda de Tolosa 70. 20018 San Sebastián. (Spain). Phone: +34-943018346. E-mail: sagrario.yarnoz@ehu.es

Abstract

Divorce is becoming increasingly widespread in Europe. In this study, I present an analysis of the role played by attachment style (secure, dismissing, preoccupied and fearful, plus the dimensions of anxiety and avoidance) in the adaptation to divorce. Participants comprised divorced parents (N = 40) from a medium-sized city in the Basque Country. The results reveal a lower proportion of people with secure attachment in the sample group of divorcees. Attachment style and dependence (emotional and instrumental) are closely related. I have also found associations between measures that showed a poor adjustment to divorce and the preoccupied and fearful attachment styles. Adjustment is related to a dismissing attachment style and to the avoidance dimension. Multiple regression analysis confirmed that secure attachment and the avoidance dimension predict adjustment to divorce and positive affectivity while preoccupied attachment and the anxiety dimension predicted negative affectivity. Implications for research and interventions with divorcees are discussed.

El divorcio es un fenómeno cada vez más frecuente en Europa. En este estudio, se presenta un análisis del papel jugado por el estilo de apego (seguro, desvalorizador, preocupado y temeroso, más las dos dimensiones de ansiedad y evitación) en la adaptación al divorcio. La muestra está compuesta por progenitores divorciados (N = 40) procedentes de una ciudad de tamaño medio del País Vasco. Los resultados revelan una proporción más baja de personas con un apego seguro en la muestra de progenitores divorciados. El estilo de apego y la dependencia (emocional e instrumental) están estrechamente relacionados. Se encontraron también asociaciones entre medidas que muestran un pobre ajuste al divorcio y los estilos de apego preocupado y temeroso. El ajuste se relaciona con un estilo de apego desvalorizador y la dimensión evitación. Los análisis de regresión múltiple confirman que el apego seguro y la dimensión evitación predicen el ajuste al divorcio y la afectividad positiva, mientras que el estilo de apego preocupado y la dimensión ansiedad predicen la afectividad negativa de los progenitores participantes. Para finalizar, discutimos las implicaciones que estos datos tienen para la investigación y la intervención con progenitores divorciados.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ainsworth, M. D. S., & Bowlby, J. (1991). An Ethological approach to Personality Development. American Psychologist, 46, 333341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ainsworth, M., Blehar, M., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of Attachment. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Alonso-Arbiol, I., Shaver, P.& Yárnoz, S. (2002). Insecure attachment, gender roles, and interpersonal dependency in the Basque Country. Personal Relationships, 9, 479490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amato, P. (2000). The consequences of divorce for adults and children. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 12691287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J.& VanIJzendoorn, M. H. (1997). Adult attachment and the break-up of romantic relationships. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 27, 121139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banse, R. (2004). Adult attachment and marital satisfaction: Evidence for dyadic configuration effects. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21(2), 273282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartholomew, K. (1990). Avoidance of intimacy: An attachment perspective. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 147178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartholomew, K.& Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 226244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beckerman, N., & Sarracco, M. (2002). Intervening with couples in relationship conflict: integrating emotionally focused couple therapy and attachment theory. Family Therapy, 29, 2331.Google Scholar
Berry, W.D. (1993). Understanding regression assumptions. London: SageCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, A. C. (2007). Re-visioning, restructuring, and reconciliation: clinical practice with complex postdivorce families. Family Process, 46, 6778.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowlby, J. (1979). The making and breaking of affectional bonds. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Bowlby, J. (1980a). Attachment and Loss. vol II. Separation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bowlby, J. (1980b). Attachment and Loss. vol III. Loss, sadness and depression. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bowlby, J. (1988). Developmental psychiatry comes of age. American Journal of Psychiatry, 145, 110.Google ScholarPubMed
Brown, P., Felton, B. J., Whiteman, V.& Manela, R. (1980). Attachment and distress following marital separation. Journal of Divorce, 3, 303317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, D., Shaver, P. R.& Vernon, M. L. (2003). Physical, Emotional, and Behavioral Reactions to Breaking up: The Roles of Gender, Age, Emotional Involvement, and Attachment Style. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 871884.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eurostat Yearbook 2006-07. Available on-line in http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/Google Scholar
Feeney, J.& Noller, P. (1996). Adult Attachment. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finzi, R., Cohen, O.& Ram, A. (2000). Attachment and Divorce. Journal of Family Psychotherapy, 11, 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraley, R. C.& Bonanno, G. A. (2004). Attachment and Loss: A Test of Three Competing Models on the Association Between Attachment-Related Avoidance and Adaptation to Bereavement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 878890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraley, R. C.& Shaver, P. R. (1999). Loss and bereavement: Attachment theory and recent controversies concerning “grief work” and the nature of detachment. In Cassidy, J. & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 735759). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Fraley, R. C., Davis, K. E.& Shaver, P. R. (1998). Dismissing-avoidance and the defensive organization of emotion, cognition, and behavior. In Simpson, J. A. & Rholes, W. S. (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 249279). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Griffin, D. W.& Bartholomew, K. (1994). The metaphysics of measurement: The case of adult attachment. In Bartholomew, K. & Perlman, D. (Eds.), Advances in personal relationships: Vol. 5. Attachment processes in adulthood (pp. 1752). London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an Attachment Process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511524.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirschfeld, R. M., Klerman, G. L., Gough, H. G., Barret, J., Korchin, S. J., & Chodoff, P. (1977). A measure of interpersonal dependency. Journal of Personality Assessment, 41, 610618.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Izard, C.E. (2002). Translating emotion theory and research into preventative interventions. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 796824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, J. B. (2007). Children's Living Arrangements Following Separation and Divorce: Insights From Empirical and Clinical Research. Family Process, 46, 3552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirkpatrick, L. A., & Davis, K. E. (1994). Attachment style, gender and relationship stability: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 66, 502512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kitson, G. C. (1982). Attachment to the spouse in divorce: A scale and its application. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44, 379393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mickelson, K. D., Kessler, R. C.& Shaver, P. R. (1997). Adult attachment in a nationally representative sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 10921106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pistole, M. C. (1996). After love: Attachment styles and grief themes. Family Journal, 4, 199207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sbarra, D. A.& Emery, R. E. (2005). The emotional sequelae of nonmarital relationship dissolution: Analysis of change and intraindividual variability over time. Personal Relationships, 12, 213232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, J. A. (1990). Influence of attachment styles on romantic relationships. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 59, 971980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, J. A., Rholes, W. S., Oriña, M. M., & Grich, J. (2002). Working Models of Attachment, Support Giving, and Support Seeking in a Stressful Situation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 598608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sobolewski, J. M., & Amato, P. R. (2007). Parents' discord and divorce, parent-child relationships and subjective well-being: Is feeling close to two parents always better than feeling close to one? Social Forces, 85, 11051124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todorski, J. (1995). Attachment and Divorce: A therapeutic view. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 22, 189205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vareschi, C. G., & Bursik, K. (2005). Attachment style differences in the parental interactions and adaptation patterns of divorcing parents. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 42, 1532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vergara, A., Yárnoz, S. y Páez, D. (1989). Escala de afectividad positiva y negativa (PNA) o de bienestar/malestar subjetivo de Bradburn (PNA, Bradburn's Positive and Negative Affectivity Scale). In Echevarría, A. & Páez, D. (eds), Emociones: perspectivas psicosociales (Emotions: Psychosocial perspectives). (pp. 477479). Madrid: Fundamentos.Google Scholar
Warr, P., Barter, J.& Brown-Bridge, G., (1983). On the independence of positive and negative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 644651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wayment, H. A.& Vierthaler, J. (2002). Attachment style and bereavement reaction. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 7, 129149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, R. S. (1975). Marital separation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Weiss, R. S. (1976). The emotional impact of marital separation. Journal of Social Issues, 32, 135145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yárnoz-Yaben, S. (2004). Ajuste autopercibido al divorcio y preocupación por la ex pareja (Self-perceived adjustment and preoccupation with the ex spouse). Unpublished manuscript. University of the Basque Country. Saint Sebastian.Google Scholar
Yárnoz-Yaben, S. (2008). La Evaluación desde la Teoría del Apego: el lugar de los autoinformes y otros instrumentos en la evaluación del apego en niños, adolescentes y adultos [Assessment from the Attachment Theory: the place of self-reports and other instruments when assessing attachment in children, adolescents and adults]. In Yárnoz-Yaben, S. (ed.) La Teoría del Apego en la Clínica I: Evaluación y clínica (Attachment Theory and the clinical practice, I) pp. 95162. Madrid: Psimática.Google Scholar
Yárnoz-Yaben, S. (2009). Forgiveness, Attachment, and Divorce. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 50, 282294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yárnoz-Yaben, S., Guerra, J., Plazaola, M., Biurrun, J., y Comino, P. (2008). Características demográficas, actitudes y dependencia en la adaptación al divorcio (Demographics, attitudes and dependence in the adjustment to divorce). Ansiedad y Estrés, 14, 4353.Google Scholar
Yarnoz-Yaben, S, Plazaola, M& Etxeberria, J. (2008). Adaptation to divorce: An attachment-based intervention with long-term divorced parents. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 49, 291307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar