Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T20:12:40.982Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Changes in marital conflict and youths' responses across childhood and adolescence: A test of sensitization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2013

Marcie C. Goeke-Morey*
Affiliation:
Catholic University of America
Lauren M. Papp
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin–Madison
E. Mark Cummings
Affiliation:
University of Notre Dame
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Marcie C. Goeke-Morey, Department of Psychology, Catholic University of America, Washington, DC 20064; E-mail: goekemorey@cua.edu.

Abstract

Although the sensitization hypothesis is fundamental to process-oriented explanations of the effects of marital conflict on children, few longitudinal tests of the theory's propositions have been conducted. Hierarchical linear modeling was used in this prospective, longitudinal study (n = 297 families) to assess changes in the dimensions of responding to conflict (i.e., emotional, cognitive, and behavioral) for 3 consecutive years in youths between the ages of 8 and 19 years. Moreover, to test the notion of sensitization, analyses were conducted to examine whether change in marital conflict predicted change in children's responding across middle childhood and adolescence. Supporting the sensitization hypothesis, increases in exposure to hostile marital conflict were associated with increases in children's negative emotionality, threat, self-blame, and skepticism about resolution. With a few exceptions, the effects were largely consistent for boys and girls and for younger and older children.

Type
Regular Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Buehler, C., Anthony, C., Krishnakumar, A., & Stone, G. (1997). Interparental conflict and youth problem behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 6, 223247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buehler, C., Lange, G., & Franck, K. L. (2007). Adolescents' cognitive and emotional responses to marital hostility. Child Development, 78, 775789.Google Scholar
Covell, K., & Abramovitch, R. (1987). Understanding emotion in the family: Children's and parents' attributions of happiness, sadness, and anger. Child Development, 58, 985991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, D. R., Allgood, S. M., Larson, J. H., & Griffin, W. (1990). Assessing marital quality with distressed and nondistressed couples: A comparison and equivalency table for three frequently used measures. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 8793.Google Scholar
Cummings, E. M., Ballard, M., & El-Sheikh, M. (1991). Responses of children and adolescents to interadult anger as a function of gender, age, and mode of expression. Merrill–Palmer Quarterly, 37, 543560.Google Scholar
Cummings, E. M., & Davies, P. T. (2002). Effects of marital conflict on children: Recent advances and emerging themes in process-oriented research. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 43, 3163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cummings, E. M., & Davies, P. T. (2010). Children, emotional security and marital conflict. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Cummings, E. M., Schermerhorn, A. C., Davies, P. T., Goeke-Morey, M. C., & Cummings, J. S. (2006). Interparental discord and child adjustment: Prospective investigations of emotional security as an explanatory mechanism. Child Development, 77, 132152.Google Scholar
Cummings, E. M., Zahn-Waxler, C., & Radke-Yarrow, M. (1981). Young children's responses to expressions of anger and affection by others in the family. Child Development, 52, 12741282.Google Scholar
David, K. M., & Murphy, B. C. (2004). Interparental conflict and late adolescents' sensitization to conflict: The moderating effects of emotional functioning and gender. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 33, 187200.Google Scholar
Davies, P. T., & Cummings, E. M. (1994). Marital conflict and child adjustment: An emotional security hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 387411.Google Scholar
Davies, P. T., Harold, G. T., Goeke-Marcie, M. C., & Cummings, E. M. (2002). Child emotional security and interparental conflict. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 67 (3, Serial No. 270), 1115.Google Scholar
Davies, P. T., & Lindsay, L. (2001). Does gender moderate the effects of conflict on children? In Grych, J. H. & Fincham, F. D. (Eds.), Child development and interparental conflict: Theory, research, and application (pp. 6497). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, P. T., & Lindsay, L. L. (2004). Interparental conflict and adolescent adjustment: Why does gender moderate early adolescent vulnerability? Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 170180.Google Scholar
Davies, P. T., Myers, R. L., Cummings, E. M., & Heindel, S. (1999). Adult conflict history and children's subsequent responses to conflict: An experimental test. Journal of Family Psychology, 13, 610628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, P. T., & Sturge-Apple, M. L. (2007). Advances in the formulation of emotional security theory: An ethologically based perspective. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 35, 87137.Google Scholar
Davies, P. T., Sturge-Apple, M. L., Cicchetti, D., & Cummings, E. M. (2008). Adrenocortical underpinnings of children's psychological reactivity to interparental conflict. Child Development, 79, 16931706.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davies, P. T., Sturge-Apple, M. L., Winter, M. A., Cummings, E. M., & Farrell, D. (2006). Child adaptational development in contexts of interparental conflict over time. Child Development, 77, 218233.Google Scholar
Davies, P. T., & Windle, M. (2001). Interparental discord and adolescent adjustment trajectories: The potentiating and protective role of intrapersonal attributes. Child Development, 72, 11631178.Google Scholar
El-Sheikh, M., Cummings, E. M., & Reiter, S. (1996). Preschoolers' responses to ongoing interadult conflict: The role of prior exposure to resolved versus unresolved arguments. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 24, 665679.Google Scholar
El-Sheikh, M., Hinnant, J. B., & Erath, S. (2011). Developmental trajectories of delinquency symptoms in childhood: The role of marital conflict and autonomic nervous system activity. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 120, 1632.Google Scholar
Goeke-Morey, M. C., Cummings, E. M., Harold, G. T., & Shelton, K. H. (2003). Categories and continua of destructive and constructive marital conflict tactics from the perspective of U.S. and Welsh children. Journal of Family Psychology, 17, 327338.Google Scholar
Grych, J. H. (1998). Children's appraisals of interparental conflict: Situational and contextual influences. Journal of Family Psychology, 12, 117.Google Scholar
Grych, J. H., & Fincham, F. D. (1990). Marital conflict and children's adjustment: A cognitive–contextual framework. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 267290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grych, J. H., & Fincham, F. D. (2001). Interparental conflict and child adjustment: An overview. In Grych, J. H. & Fincham, F. D. (Eds.), Interparental conflict and child development: Theory, research, and application (pp. 16). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grych, J. H., Seid, M., & Fincham, F. D. (1993). Assessing marital conflict from the child's perspective: The children's perceptions of the interparental conflict scale. Child Development, 64, 215230.Google Scholar
Hammen, C., Henry, R., & Daley, S. E. (2000). Depression and sensitization to stressors among young women as a function of childhood adversity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 782787.Google Scholar
Laumakis, M., Margolin, G., & John, R. (1998). The emotional, cognitive, and coping responses of preadolescent children to different dimensions of marital conflict. In Holden, G., Geffner, B., & Jouriles, E. N. (Eds.), Children and family violence (pp. 257288). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Laursen, B. (1993). The perceived impact of conflict on adolescent relationships. Merrill–Palmer Quarterly, 39, 535550.Google Scholar
Locke, H. J., & Wallace, K. M. (1959). Short marital adjustment and prediction tests: Their reliability and validity. Journal of Marriage and Family Living, 21, 251255.Google Scholar
McDonald, R., & Grych, J. H. (2006). Young children's appraisals of interparental conflict: Measurement and links with adjustment problems. Journal of Family Psychology, 20, 8899.Google Scholar
Porter, B., & O'Leary, K. D. (1980). Marital discord and childhood behavior problems. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 8, 287295.Google Scholar
Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., & Congdon, R. T. (2004). HLM6: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Chicago: Scientific Software International.Google Scholar
Rhoades, K. A. (2008). Children's responses to interparental conflict: A meta-analysis of their associations with child adjustment. Child Development, 79, 19421956.Google Scholar
Richmond, M. K., & Stocker, C. M. (2007). Changes in children's appraisals of marital discord from childhood through adolescence. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 416425.Google Scholar
Ruble, D. N., & Martin, C. L. (1998). Gender development. In Damon, W. (Series Ed.) & Eisenberg, N. (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 105176). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Schermerhorn, A. C., Chow, S., & Cummings, E. M. (2010). Developmental family processes and interparental conflict: Patterns of microlevel influences. Developmental Psychology, 46, 869885.Google Scholar
Schermerhorn, A. C., Cummings, E. M., DeCarlo, C. A., & Davies, P. T. (2007). Children's influence in the marital relationship. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 259269.Google Scholar
Singer, J. D., & Willet, J. B. (2002). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change an event occurrence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Umberson, D., Williams, K., Powers, D. A., Chen, M. D., & Campbell, A. M., (2005). As good as it gets: A life course perspective on marital quality. Social Forces, 84, 487505.Google Scholar