Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T10:42:36.550Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the ability to provide evaluative comments: further explorations of children's narrative competencies*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Michael Bamberg*
Affiliation:
Clark University
Robin Damrad-Frye
Affiliation:
Clark University
*
Department of Psychology, Clark University, Worcester, MA 01610, USA

Abstract

This study investigated the changing functions of evaluative devices in children's narratives. The evaluative devices included (a) references to ‘frames of mind’, particularly to emotions, (b) character speech, (c) ‘hedges’, (d) negative qualifiers, and (e) causal connectors. Narratives were elicited from a 24-picture story book. The subjects were three groups of native English-speaking Americans (12 per group): five- and nine-year-old children and college undergraduate students. A quantitative comparison revealed that (i) adults used evaluative devices three times as often as five-year-olds, and two-and-a-half times as often as the nine-year-old children; (ii) adults used significantly more references to ‘frames of mind’ and ‘hedges’ than the children; and (iii) whereas five-year-olds used each evaluative type equally often, nine-year-olds and adults used references to ‘frames of mind’ significantly more than the other four evaluation types. A second analysis, focusing specifically on the discourse functions of references to ‘frames of mind’ revealed that, early on, this particular device is used to express a local evaluative perspective on particular events, while with increasing age it is used to signal the hierarchial organization of the story events. These findings are discussed with regard to two non-linguistic developmental achievements, the formation of event schemas and the formation of a theory of mind.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

An earlier version of this paper was presented at the SRCD Meeting in Kansas, Missouri, in April 1989 under the title ‘Form and function of evaluative language in narration’. We would like to thank Nancy Budwig, Alison Gopnik, Debra Harkins, Paul Harris, Allyssa McCabe, Judy Reilly and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on an earlier draft. Special thanks go to Virginia Marchman and Tanya Renner for making available the data for the analyses.

References

REFERENCES

Astington, J. W., Harris, P. L. & Olson, D. R. (eds) (1988). Developing theories of mind. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Bamberg, M. (1987). The acquisition of narratives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bamberg, M. (in press). Narrative as perspective taking: the role of emotionals, negations, and voice in the construction of the story realm. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.Google Scholar
Bamberg, M. (1990). The German perfekt: form and function of tense alternations. Studies in Language 14, 253–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bamberg, M., Budwig, N. & Kaplan, B. (1991). A developmental approach to language acquisition: two case studies. First Language 11, 121–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bamberg, M. & Marchman, V. (1990). What holds a narrative together? The linguistic encoding of episode boundaries. Papers in Pragmatics 4, 58121.Google Scholar
Bates, E. & MacWhinney, B. (1982). Functionalist approaches to grammar. In Wanner, E. & Gleitman, L. (eds), Language acquisition: the state of the art. New York: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Bates, E. & MacWhinney, B. (1987). Competition, variation, and language learning. In MacWhinney, B. (ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Barthes, R. (1970). S/Z. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Barthes, R. (1977). Image, music, text. Essays selected and translated by Heath, Stephen. New York: Hill & Wang.Google Scholar
Fivush, R. & Slackman, E. A. (1986). The acquisition and development of scripts. In Nelson, K. (ed.), Event knowledge. Structure and function in development. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Flavell, J. H. (1988). The development of children's knowledge about the mind: from cognitive connections to mental representations. In Astington, J. W., Harris, P. L. & Olson, D. R. (eds), Developing theories of the mind. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Flavell, J. H. (1989). Young children's understanding of fact beliefs versus value beliefs. Paper presented in the symposium on ‘Children's theory of mind’, at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Kansas City, Missouri.Google Scholar
Harris, P. L. (1983). Children's understanding of the link between situation and emotion. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 36, 490509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, P. L. & Gross, D. (1988). Children's understanding of real and apparent emotion. In Astington, J. W., Harris, P. L. & Olson, D. R. (eds), Developing theories of mind. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Harris, P. L. & Olthof, T. (1982). The child's concept of emotion. In Butterworth, G. & Light, P. (eds), Social cognition. Brighton: Harvester.Google Scholar
Harris, P. L., Olthof, T. & Meerum Terwogt, M. (1981). Children's knowledge of emotion. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 22, 247–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hood, L. & Bloom, L. (1979). What, when, and how about why: longitudinal study of early expressions of causality. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 44, no. 6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kamio, A. (1979). On the notion ‘speaker's territory of information’: a functional analysis of certain sentence-final forms in Japanese. In Bedell, G., Kobayashi, E. & Muraki, M. (eds), Explorations in linguistics: papers in honor of Kazuko Inoue. Tokyo: Kenkyusha.Google Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1979). A functional approach to child language. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
KarmilofT-Smith, A. (1984). Children's problem-solving. In Lamb, M. E., Brown, A. L. & Rogoff, B. (eds), Advances in developmental psychology: Vol. 3. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kay, P. (1979). The role of cognitive schemata in word meaning: hedges revisited. Department of Linguistics, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Kay, P. (1983). Linguistic competence and folk theories of language: two English hedges. In Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Kernan, K. (1977). Semantic and expressive elaboration in children's narratives. In Ervin-Tripp, S. & Mitchell-Kernan, C. (eds), Child discourse. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kuno, S. (1987). Functional syntax: anaphora, discourse and empathy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1981). Speech actions and reactions in personal narrative. In Tannen, D. (ed.), Georgetown round table on languages and linguistics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W., Cohen, P., Robins, C. & Lewis, J. (1968). A study of the non-standard English of Negro and Puerto Rican speakers in New York City, Vol. 2. (Cooperative Research Project No. 3288.) Washington, D.C.: Office of Education.Google Scholar
Labov, W. & Waletzky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis: oral versions of personal experience. In Helm, J. (ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1972). Hedges: a study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. In Papers from the Eighth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lillard, A. S. & Flavell, J. H. (1989). Young children's preference for mental state versus behavioral descriptions of human action. Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford.Google Scholar
McCabe, A. & Peterson, C. (1985). A naturalistic study of the production of causal connectives by children. Journal of Child Language 12, 145–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piaget, J. (1929, 1979). The child's conception of the world. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Peterson, C. & McCabe, A. (1983). Developmental psycholinguistics: three ways of looking at a child's narrative. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renner, J. A. T. (1988). Development of temporality in children's narratives. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California Berkeley.Google Scholar
Slackman, E. A., Hudson, J. A. & Fivush, R. (1986). Actions, actors, links, and goals: the structure of childen's event representations. In Nelson, K. (ed.), Event knowledge. Structure and function in development. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. A. (1989). Cross linguistic perspective on the development of narrative ability: learning to talk about movement through time and space. Paper presented in the symposium on ‘The cross-linguistic study of child language’, at the tenth biennial meeting of the International Society for the Study of Behavioural Development, Jyväskylä, Finland.Google Scholar
Thompson, S. A. (1987). ‘Subordination’ and narrative event structure. In Russell, T. S. (ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Umiker-Sebeok, D. J. (1979). Preschool children's intraconversational narratives. Journal of Child Language 6, 91109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellman, H. M. (1988). First steps in the child's theorizing about the mind. In Astington, J. W., Harris, P. L. & Olson, D. R. (eds), Developing theories of the mind. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Weist, R. S., Kaczmarek, A. & Wysocka, J. (1989). The function of aspectual configurations in the conversational and narrative discourse of Finnish, Polish, and American children. Paper presented in the symposium on ‘The cross-linguistic study of child language’, at the tenth biennial meeting of the International Society for the Study of Behavioural Development, Jyväskylä, Finland.Google Scholar
Wolfson, N. (1982). CHP. The conversational historical present in American English narrative. Dordrecht, Holland: Foris Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, S. (1987). Tense meanings as styles in fictional narrative. Poetics 16, 5373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, K. (1984). Ontological puzzles about narrative. Poetics 13, 239–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, K. (1987). Tale worlds and story realms. Dordrecht, Holland: Nijhoff.Google Scholar