Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T14:04:26.424Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gender and Adaptation to Widowhood in Later Life

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2008

Nan Stevens
Nan Stevens
Affiliation:
Department of Psychogerontology, University of Nijmegen, Postbus 9104, 6500 HE Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Examination of the well-being and living conditions of older widows and widowers reveals ways in which adaptation to loss of the partner in later life is influenced by gender. This article compares the results of two Dutch studies, one on men and one on women between the ages of 60 and 75, living independently and widowed three to five years earlier. The same combination of quantitative and qualitative methods was used in these studies. The results indicate remarkable similarities in the well-being of the widows and widowers. Gender influences the availability of resources such as income, education and freedom from health restrictions, with widowers demonstrating clear advantages compared to widows. In the area of relational resources, widows who are well adapted have more varied sources of support, including close female friends and supportive neighbours in addition to children. Widowers benefit more from the presence of new partners or partner-like relationships; the tendency of many widowers to rely strongly on children is a disadvantage. Few significant differences were found in the relational needs acknowledged by widows and widowers; however, acknowledging the need for intimacy is differentially related to life satisfaction for widowed men and women. An unexpected finding is the effect of gender on life satisfaction, which remains when other variables have been entered into the equation in regression analysis. Several possible interpretations for this gender factor are provided; these involve the possibility of greater diversity in the ways in which women adapt to widowhood, women's special virtuosity in relationships, and a kind of flexibility that is developed in the course of women's lives which helps them adapt to major change later life, despite structural disadvantages in comparison to men.

Keywords

Widowhoodadaptationgenderprimary relationshipswell-beinglife satisfactionloneliness
Type
Research Article
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , March 1995 , pp. 37 - 58
Copyright
Copyright Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Antonucci, T. C. and Akiyama, H. 1987. An examination of sex differences in social support among older men and women. Sex Roles, 17, 737–749.Google Scholar
Arens, D. A. 1982. Widowhood and well-being: An examination of sex differences within a causal model. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 15, 27–40.Google Scholar
Bosma, A. 1988. De Gezondheid van Mensen in de Derde Levensfase: Een Onderzoek naar Lichamelijke en Psychische Aspekten. (The health of persons in the third phase of life: A study on physical and mental aspects.) Afdeling Preventieve en Sociale Psychiatrie, GGD Eindhoven.Google Scholar
Bradburn, N. M. 1969. The Structure of Well-being. Aldine, Chicago.Google Scholar
Campbell, A., Converse, P. E. and Rodgers, W. L. 1976. The Quality of American Life: Perceptions, Evaluations, and Satisfactions. Russell Sage Foundation, New York.Google Scholar
Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek. 1990. Statistisch Vademecum Ouderen 1990, SDU uitgeverij, Gravenhage.Google Scholar
De Jong, A. H. 1988. Sterke groei 65 plussers (Sharp rise in the number of over sixty-fives). Maandstatistiek voor de Bevolking, 10, 9–10.Google Scholar
De Jong-Gierveld, J. and Kamphuis, F. 1985. The development of a Rasch-type loneliness scale. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 289–299.Google Scholar
Depner, C. E. and Ingersoll-Dayton, B. 1988. Supportive relationships in later life, Psychology and Aging, 3, 348–357.Google Scholar
Dohrenwend, B. P. and Dohrenwend, B. S. 1981. Socioenvironmental factors, stress, and psychopathology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 9, 128–164.Google Scholar
Dykstra, P. A. 1990. Disentangling direct and indirect gender effects on the supportive network. In Knipscheer, C. P. M. and Antonucci, T. C. (eds), Social network research: substantive issues and methodological questions (pp. 55–65). Swets and Zeitlinger, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Feinson, M. C. 1986. Aging widows and widowers: Are there mental health differences? International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 23, 241–255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feinson, M. C. 1987. Mental health and aging: Are there gender differences? Gerontologist, 27, 703–711.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fooken, I. 1985. Old and female: Psychosocial concomitants of the aging process in a group of older women. In Munnichs, J. M. A., Mussen, P., Olbrich, E. and Coleman, P. G. (eds), Life-span and Change in a Gerontological Perspective (pp. 77–101). Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Gallagher, D. E., Thompson, L. W. and Peterson, J. A. 1981–1982. Psychosocial factors affecting adaptation to bereavement in the elderly. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 14, 79–95.Google Scholar
Gartz, M. and Baakman, T. 1991. Welbevinden en relaties van oudere weduwnaars (Well-being and the relationships of older widowers). Unpublished master's thesis. University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
Gutmann, D. 1987. Reclaimed powers. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
Kline, C. 1975. The socialization process of women. Geronlologist, 15, 486–492.Google Scholar
Krause, N. 1986. Social support, stress, and well-being among older adults. Journal of Gerontology, 41, 512–519.Google Scholar
Kuin, Y. 1986. Ondersteuningsgroepen voor Ouderen: hun Betekenis voor de Belevenis van Belangrijke Levensgebeurtenissen. (Support groups for older persons: their meaning for the experience of important life events.) Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nijmegen, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
Longino, C. F. and Lipman, A. 1982. The married, the formerly married and never married: Support system differentials of older women in planned retirement communities. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 15, 285–297.Google Scholar
Lopata, H. Z. 1975. On widowhood: griefwork and identity reconstruction. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, VIII, 41–53.Google Scholar
Lund, D. A., Caserta, M. S. and Dimond, M. F. 1986. Gender differences through two years of bereavement among the elderly. Gerontologist, 26, 314–320.Google Scholar
Myerhoff, B. 1978. Number Our Days. Simon and Schuster, New York.Google Scholar
Norris, F. H. and Murrell, S. A. 1990. Social support, life events, and stress as modifiers of adjustment to bereavement by older adults. Psychology and Aging, 5, 429–436.Google Scholar
Sinott, J. D. 1977. Sex-role inconstancy, biology and successful aging. Gerontologist, 17, 459–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, N. L. 1989. Well-being in Widowhood: a Question of Balance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
Stevens, N. L. 1990. Widowhood, well-being and the quality of primary relationships. In Knipscheer, C. P. M. and Antonucci, T. C. (eds), Social Network Research: Substantive Issues and Methodological Questions (pp. 83–100). Swets and Zeitlinger, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Stroebe, M. S. and Stroebe, W. 1983. Who suffers more? Sex differences in health risks of the widowed. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 279–301.Google Scholar
Stroebe, W. and Stroebe, M.S. 1987. Bereavement and Health: The Psychological and Physical Consequences of Partner Loss. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Taylor, R. and Ford, G. 1983. Inequalities in old age: An examination of age, sex and class differences in a sample of community elderly. Ageing and Society, 3, 183–208.Google Scholar
Vachon, M. L. S., Sheldon, A. R., Lancee, W. J., Lyall, W. A. L., Rogers, J. and Freeman, S.J.J. 1982. Correlates of enduring distress patterns following bereavement: social network, life situation and personality. Psychological Medicine, 12, 783–788.Google Scholar
Vaux, A. 1985. Variations in social support associated with gender, ethnicity and age. Journal of Social Issues, 41, 89–110.Google Scholar
Verbrugge, L. M. 1983. Women and men: mortality and health of older people. In Riley, M. W., Hess, B. B., and Bond, K., (eds), Aging in Society: Selected Reviews of Recent Research (pp. 139–74). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London.Google Scholar
Weiss, R. S. 1974. The provisions of social relationships. In Rubin, Z., (ed), Doing unto Others: Joining, Molding, Conforming, Helping, Loving (pp. 17–26). Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar
Wister, A. V. and Strain, L. 1986. Social support and well-being: a comparison of older widows and widowers. Canadian Journal on Aging, 5, 205–220.Google Scholar