Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-10T17:40:37.130Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on metaphor comprehension in individuals with autism spectrum disorder: Do task properties matter?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2019

Tamar Kalandadze Open the ORCID record for Tamar Kalandadze [Opens in a new window] ,
Valentina Bambini Open the ORCID record for Valentina Bambini [Opens in a new window]  and
Kari-Anne B. Næss Open the ORCID record for Kari-Anne B. Næss [Opens in a new window]
Tamar Kalandadze*
Affiliation:
University of Oslo, Norway Knowledge Centre for Education, University of Stavanger, Norway
Valentina Bambini
Affiliation:
University School for Advanced Studies IUSS Pavia, Italy
Kari-Anne B. Næss
Affiliation:
University of Oslo, Norway
*
*Corresponding author. Email: tamar.kalandadze@isp.uio.no/tamar.kalandadze@uis.no
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) often experience difficulty in comprehending metaphors compared to individuals with typical development (TD). However, there is a large variation in the results across studies, possibly related to the properties of the metaphor tasks. This preregistered systematic review and meta-analysis (a) explored the properties of the metaphor tasks used in ASD research, and (b) investigated the group difference between individuals with ASD and TD on metaphor comprehension, as well as the relationship between the task properties and any between-study variation. A systematic search was undertaken in seven relevant databases. Fourteen studies fulfilled our predetermined inclusion criteria. Across tasks, we detected four types of response format and a great variety of metaphors in terms of familiarity, syntactic structure, and linguistic context. Individuals with TD outperformed individuals with ASD on metaphor comprehension (Hedges’ g = −0.63). Verbal explanation response format was utilized in the study showing the largest effect size in the group comparison. However, due to the sparse experimental manipulations, the role of task properties could not be established. Future studies should consider and report task properties to determine their role in metaphor comprehension, and to inform experimental paradigms as well as educational assessment.

Keywords

autism spectrum disorderexperimental pragmaticsfigurative languageresponse format
Type
Original Article
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 40 , Issue 6 , November 2019 , pp. 1421 - 1454
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

*Adachi, T., Koeda, T., Hirabayashi, S., Maeoka, Y., Shiota, M., Wright, E. C., & Wasa, A. (2004). The metaphor and sarcasm scenario test: A new instrument to help differentiate high functioning pervasive developmental disorder from attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Brain & Development, 26, 301–306. doi: 10.1016/S0387-7604(03)00170-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV-TR. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-V. Arlington, VA: Author.Google Scholar
Arcara, G., Tonini, E., Muriago, G., Mondin, E., Sgarabottolo, E., Bertagnoni, G., … Bambini, V. (2019). Pragmatics and figurative language in individuals with traumatic brain injury: Fine-grained assessment and relevance-theoretic considerations. Aphasiology. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2019.1615033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bambini, V., Bertini, C., Schaeken, W., Stella, A., & Di Russo, F. (2016). Disentangling metaphor from context: An ERP study. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 559. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bambini, V., Gentili, C., Ricciardi, E., Bertinetto, P. M., & Pietrini, P. (2011). Decomposing metaphor processing at the cognitive and neural level through functional magnetic resonance imaging. Brain Research Bulletin, 86, 203–216. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2011.07.015CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bambini, V., Ghio, M., Moro, A., & Schumacher, P. B. (2013). Differentiating among pragmatic uses of words through timed sensicality judgments. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 938. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00938CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bambini, V., Resta, D., & Grimaldi, M. (2014). A dataset of metaphors from the Italian literature: Exploring psycholinguistic variables and the role of context. PLOS ONE, 9, e105634. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, D. V. M., & Norbury, C. F. (2005). Executive functions in children with communication impairments, in relation to autistic symptomatology: 2. Response inhibition. Autism, 9, 29–43. doi: 10.1177/1362361305049028CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blasko, D. G., & Connine, C. M. (1993). Effects of familiarity and aptness on metaphor processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 295–308. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.19.2.295Google ScholarPubMed
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester, UK: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L., Higgins, J., & Rothstein, H. (2014). Comprehensive meta-analysis. Version 3. Englewood, NJ: Biostat.Google Scholar
Bottini, G., Corcoran, R., Sterzi, R., Paulesu, E., Schenone, P., Scarpa, P., … Frith, C. D. (1994). The role of the right hemisphere in the interpretation of figurative aspects of language: A positron emission tomography activation study. Brain, 117, 1241–1253. doi: 10.1093/brain/117.6.1241CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowdle, B. F., & Gentner, D. (2005). The career of metaphor. Psychological Review, 112, 193–216. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.112.1.193CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boxhoorn, S., Lopez, E., Schmidt, C., Schulze, D., Hänig, S., & Freitag, C. M. (2018). Attention profiles in autism spectrum disorder and subtypes of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 27, 1433–1447. doi: 10.1007/s00787-018-1138-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brock, J., Norbury, C., Einav, S., & Nation, K. (2008). Do individuals with autism process words in context? Evidence from language-mediated eye-movements. Cognition, 108, 896–904. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.06.007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brynskov, C., Krøjgaard, P., & Eigsti, I. (2016). Language and communication in children with autism: Do research and clinical practice converge in Denmark? Nordic Psychology, 68, 100–113. doi: 10.1080/19012276.2015.1071199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camp, E. (2009). Metaphor. In Cummings, L. (Ed.), The pragmatics encyclopedia. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cardillo, E. R., Schmidt, G. L., Kranjec, A., & Chatterjee, A. (2010). Stimulus design is an obstacle course: 560 matched literal and metaphorical sentences for testing neural hypotheses about metaphor. Behavioral Research Methods, 42, 651–664. doi: 10.3758/BRM.42.3.651CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cardillo, E. R., Watson, C. E., & Chatterjee, A. (2017). Stimulus needs are a moving target: 240 additional matched literal and metaphorical sentences for testing neural hypotheses about metaphor. Behavioral Research, 49, 471–483. doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0717-1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cardillo, E. R., Watson, C. E., Schmidt, G. L., Kranjec, A., & Chatterjee, A. (2012). From novel to familiar: Turning the brain for metaphors. Neuroimage, 59, 3212–3221. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carotenuto, A., Arcara, G., Orefice, G., Cerillo, I., Giannino, V., Rasulo, M., … Bambini, V. (2018). Communication in multiple sclerosis: Pragmatic deficit and its relation with cognition and social cognition. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 33, 194–205. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acx061CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carston, R. (2010). Lexical pragmatics, ad hoc concepts and metaphor: A relevance theory perspective. Italian Journal of Linguistics, 22, 153–180.Google Scholar
Carston, R. (2012). Metaphor and the literal/nonliteral distinction. In Allan, K. & Jaszczolt, K. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of pragmatics (pp. 469–492). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chahboun, S., Vulchanov, V., Saldaña, D., Eshuis, H., & Vulchanova, M. (2017). Can you tell it by the prime? A study of metaphorical priming in high-functioning autism in comparison with matched controls. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 52, 766–785. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chakrabarty, M., Sarkar, S., Chatterjee, A., Ghosal, M., Guha, P., & Deogaonkar, M. (2014). Metaphor comprehension deficit in schizophrenia with reference to the hypothesis of abnormal lateralization and right hemisphere dysfunction. Language Sciences, 44, 1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2014.01.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, E., Widick, P., & Chatterjee, A. (2008). Functional anatomical organization of predicate metaphor processing. Brain and Language, 107, 194–202. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2008.06.007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
*Chouinard, B., & Cummine, J. (2016). All the world’s a stage: Evaluation of two stages of metaphor comprehension in people with autism spectrum disorder. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 23, 107–121. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2015.12.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Routledge Academic.Google Scholar
Cooper, H. M., Hedges, L. V., & Valentine, J. C. (Eds.) (2009). The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Sage.Google Scholar
Dettmer, S., Simpson, R. L., Smith Myles, B., & Granz, J. B. (2000). The use of visual supports to facilitate transitions of students with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 15, 163–169. doi: 10.1177/1088357614528799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*de Villiers, P. A., de Villiers, J. G., Diaz, S., Cheung, C., Alig, R., & Raditz, V. (2011). Nonliteral language and theory of mind in autism spectrum disorders. Poster presented at the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association convention, San Diego, CA, November 17–19.Google Scholar
Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56, 455–463. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-34IX.2000.00455.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frith, U. (1989). A new look at language and communication in autism. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 24, 123–150. doi: 10.3109/13682828909011952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frith, U., & Happé, F. (1994). Autism: Beyond “theory of mind.” Cognition, 50, 115–132. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90024-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fu, R., Gartlehner, G., Grant, M., Shamliyan, T., Sedrakyan, A., Wilt, T. J., … Trikalinos, T. A. (2011). Conducting quantitative synthesis when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 64, 1187–1197. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.08.010CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gentner, D., Bowdle, B. F., Wolff, P., & Boronat, C. (2001). Metaphor is like analogy. In Centner, D., Holyoak, K. J., & Kokinov, B. N. (Eds.), The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science (pp. 199–253). Cambridge MA, MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gernsbacher, M. A., & Pripas-Kapit, S. R. (2012). Who’s missing the point? A commentary on claims that autistic persons have a specific deficit in figurative language comprehension. Metaphor and Symbol, 27, 93–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. (2011). Evaluating conceptual metaphor theory. Discourse Processes, 48, 529–562. doi: 10.1080/0163853X.2011.606103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., & Tendahl, M. (2006). Cognitive effort and effects in metaphor comprehension: Relevance theory and psycholinguistics. Mind & Language, 21, 379–403. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0017.2006.00283.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giora, R., Gazal, O., Goldstein, I., Fein, O., & Stringaris, A. (2012). Salience and context: Interpretation of metaphorical and literal language by young adults diagnosed with Asperger’s syndrome. Metaphor and Symbol, 27, 22–54. doi: 10.1080/10926488.2012.638823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gluksberg, S. (2001). Understanding figurative language: From metaphors to idioms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gluksberg, S. (2003). The psycholinguistics of metaphor. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 92–96. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(02)00040-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gluksberg, S., Gildea, P., & Bookin, H. B. (1982). On understanding nonliteral speech: Can people ignore metaphors? Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 85–98. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(82)90467-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glucksberg, S., & Keysar, B. (1990). Understanding metaphorical comparisons: Beyond similarity. Psychological Review, 97, 3–18. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.97.1.3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Gold, R., & Faust, M. (2010). Right hemisphere dysfunction and metaphor comprehension in young adults with Asperger syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40, 800–811. doi: 10.1007/s10803-009-0930-1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gold, R., Faust, M., & Goldstein, A. (2010). Semantic integration during metaphor comprehension in Asperger syndrome. Brain and Language, 113, 124–134. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2010.03.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Golden, A. (2010). Grasping the point. A study of 15-year-old students’ comprehension of metaphorical expression in schoolbooks. In Low, G., Todd, Z., Deignan, A., & Cameron, L. (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor in the real world. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
*Gunter, H. L., Ghaziuddin, M., & Ellis, H. D. (2002). Asperger syndrome: Tests of right hemisphere functioning and interhemispheric communication. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 32, 263–281. doi: 10.1023/A:1016326701439CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Happé, F. G. E. (1993). Communicative competence and theory of mind in autism: A test of relevance theory. Cognition, 48, 101–119. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(93)90026-RCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Happé, F. (1999). Autism: Cognitive deficit or cognitive style? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 216–222. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01318-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harper-Hill, K., Copland, D., & Arnott, W. (2014). Pathways to meaning: Written and spoken word priming in children with ASD versus typically developing peers. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8, 1351–1363. doi: 10.1016/j.easd.2014.07.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedges, L. V. (1981). Distribution theory for Glass’s estimator of effect size and related estimators. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 6, 107–128. doi: 10.3102%2F10769986006002107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedges, L., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
*Hermann, I., Haser, V., van Elst, L. T., Ebert, D., Müller-Feldmeth, D., Riedel, A., & Konieczny, L. (2013). Automatic metaphor processing in adults with Asperger syndrome: A metaphor interference effect task. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 263 (Suppl. 2), S177–S187. doi: 10.1007/s00406-013-0453-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ, 327, 557–560.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, E. L. (2004). Evaluating the theory of executive dysfunction in autism. Developmental Review, 24, 189–233. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2004.01.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Huang, S., Oi, M., & Taguchi, A. (2015). Comprehension of figurative language in Taiwanese children with autism: The role of theory of mind and receptive vocabulary. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 29, 764–775. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2015.1027833CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacobs, A. M., & Kinder, A. (2017). “The brain is the prisoner of thought”: A machine-learning assisted quantitative narrative analysis of literary metaphors for use in neurocognitive poetics. Metaphor and Symbol, 32, 139–160. doi: 10.1080/10926488.2017.1338015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jodzio, K., Lojek, E., & Bryan, K. (2005). Functional and neuroanatomical analysis of extralinguistic disorders in right hemisphere-damaged patients. Psychology of Language and Communication, 9, 55–73. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863Google Scholar
Kalandadze, T., Norbury, C., Nærland, T., & Næss, B. K.-A. (2018). Figurative language comprehension in individuals with autism spectrum disorder: A meta-analytic review. Autism, 22, 99–117. doi: 10.1177/1362361316668652CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kamio, Y., & Toichi, M. (2000). Dual access to semantics in autism: Is pictorial access superior to verbal access? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 41, 859–867. doi: 10.1017/S0021963099006137CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
*Kasirer, A., & Mashal, N. (2014). Verbal creativity in autism: comprehension and generation of metaphoric language in high-functioning autism spectrum disorder and typical development. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 615. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00615CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
*Kasirer, A., & Mashal, N. (2016). Comprehension and generation of metaphors by children with autism spectrum disorder. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 32, 53–63. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2016.08.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kline, A. B. (2009). Becoming a behavioural science researcher. A guide to producing research that matters. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Kwok, E. Y. L., Brown, H. M., Smyth, R. E., & Cardy, J. O. (2015). Meta-analysis of receptive and expressive language skills in autism spectrum disorder. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 9, 202–222. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2014.10.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 863.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by: Language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lau, J., Ioannidis, J., Terrin, N., Schmid, C. H., & Olkin, I. (2006). The case of the misleading funnel plot. British Medical Journal, 333, 597–600. doi: 10.1136/bmj.333.7568.597CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lecce, S., Ronchi, L., Del Sette, P., Bischetti, L., & Bambini, V. (2019). Interpreting physical and mental metaphors: Is Theory of Mind associated with pragmatics in middle childhood? Journal of Child Language, 46, 393–407. doi: 10.1017/S030500091800048XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, S. S., & Dapretto, M. (2006). Metaphorical vs. literal word meanings: FMRI evidence against a selective role of the right hemisphere. NeuroImage, 29, 536–544. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.08.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, F. M., Murdoch, B. E., & Woodyatt, G. C. (2007). Communicative competence and metalinguistic ability: Performance by children and adults with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 1525–1538. doi: 10.1007/s10803-006-0265-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mashal, N., Faust, M., Hendler, T., & Jung-Beeman, M. (2009). An fMRI study of processing novel metaphoric sentences. Laterality, 14, 30–54. doi: 10.1080/13576500802049433CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
*Mashal, N., & Kasirer, A. (2011). Thinking maps enhance metaphoric competence in children with autism and learning disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 2045–2054. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.08.012CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
*Melogno, S., D’Ardia, C., Pinto, M. A., & Levi, G. (2012). Explaining metaphors in high-functioning autism spectrum disorder children: A brief report. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6, 683–689. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2011.09.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melogno, S., Pinto, M. A., & Di Filippo, G. (2017). Sensory and physico-psychological metaphor comprehension in children with ASD: A preliminary study on the outcomes of a treatment. Brain Sciences, 7, 85. doi: 10.3390/brainsci7070085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melogno, S., Pinto, M. A., & Levi, G. (2012). Metaphor and metonymy in ASD children: A critical review from a developmental perspective. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6, 1289–1296. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2012.04.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melogno, S., Pinto, M. A., & Levi, G. (2015). Profile of the linguistic and metalinguistic abilities of a gifted child with autism spectrum disorder: A case study. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 31, 113–126. doi: 10.1177/0265659014530414cltCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D.G., & The PRISMA Group (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med, 6, e1000097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed1000097CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naigles, L. R. (Ed.) (2017). Innovative investigations of language in autism spectrum disorder. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, C., McDonnell, A. P., Johnston, S. S., Crompton, A., & Nelson, A. R. (2007). Keys to play: A strategy to increase the social interactions of young children with autism and their typically developing peers. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 42, 165–181.Google Scholar
Nippold, M. A. (2016). Later language development: School-age children, adolescents, and young adults (4th ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
Norbury, C. F. (2004). Factors supporting idiom comprehension in children with communication disorders. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 1179–1193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norbury, C. F. (2005). The relationship between theory of mind and metaphor: Evidence from children with language impairment and autistic spectrum disorder. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 23, 383–399. doi: 10.1348/026151005X26732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Connor, K. (2012). Auditory processing in autism spectrum disorder: A review. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 36, 836–854. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.11.008CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
*Olofson, E. L., Casey, D., Oluyedun, O. A., van Herwegen, J., Becerra, A., & Rundblad, G. (2014). Youth with autism spectrum disorder comprehend lexicalized and novel primary conceptual metaphors. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44, 2568–2583. doi: 10.1007/s10803-014-2129-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paul, R., & Norbury, C. (2012). Language disorders from infancy through adolescence: Listening, speaking, reading, writing, and communicating. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Health Sciences.Google Scholar
Pennington, B. F., & Ozonoff, S. (1996). Executive functions and developmental psychopathology. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 37, 51–87. doi: 10/1111/j.1469-7610.1996.tb01380.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perlini, C., Bellani, M., Finos, L., Lasalvia, A., Bonetto, C., Scocco, P., … GET UP group. (2018). Non-literal language comprehension in a large sample of first episode psychosis patients in adulthood. Psychiatry Research, 260, 78–89. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.11.032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pexman, P. M., Rostad, K. R., McMorris, C. A., Climie, E. A., Stowkowy, J., & Glenwright, M. R. (2011). Processing of ironic language in children with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41, 1097–1112. doi: 10.1007/s10803-010-1131-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinto, M. A., Melogno, S., & Iliceto, P. (2008). TCM Junior: Test di comprensione delle metafore (Scuola dell’infanzia e scuola primaria). Roma: Carocci-Faber.Google Scholar
Pouscoulous, N. (2011). Metaphor: For adults only? Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 25, 51–79. doi: 10.1075/bjl.25.04pouGoogle Scholar
Pouscoulous, N. (2014). “The elevator’s buttocks” metaphorical abilities in children. In Matthews, D. (Ed.), Pragmatic development in first language acquisition. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Rao, S. M., & Gagie, B. (2006). Learning through seeing and doing. Visual supports for children with autism. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38, 26–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapp, A. M., Felsenheimer, A. K., Langohr, K., & Klupp, M. (2018). The comprehension of familiar and novel metaphoric meanings in schizophrenia: A pilot study. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2251. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02251CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Recanati, F. (2004). Literal meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Reed, P., & McCarthy, J. (2011). Cross-modal attention-switching is impaired in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42, 947–953. doi: 10.1007/s10803-011-1324-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rinaldi, M. C., Marangolo, P., & Baldassarri, F. (2004). Metaphor comprehension in right brain-damaged patients with visuo-verbal and verbal material: A dissociation (re)considered. Cortex, 40, 479–490. doi: 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70141-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rossetti, I., Brambilla, P., & Papagno, C. (2018). Metaphor comprehension in schizophrenic patients. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 670. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00670CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
*Rundblad, G., & Annaz, D. (2010a). The atypical development of metaphor and metonymy comprehension in children with autism. Autism, 14, 29–46. doi: 10.1177/1362361309340667CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rundblad, G., & Annaz, D. (2010b). Development of metaphor and metonymy comprehension: Receptive vocabulary and conceptual knowledge. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 28, 547–563. doi: 10.1348/026151009X454373CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schaeken, W., Van Haeren, M., & Bambini, V. (2018). The understanding of scalar implicatures in children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: Dichotomized responses to violations of informativeness. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1266. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01266CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmidt, W. L., & Seger, C. A. (2009). Neural correlates of metaphor processing: The roles of figurativeness, familiarity and difficulty. Brain and Cognition, 7, 375–386. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.06.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siqueira, M., Marques, D. F., & Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (2016). Metaphor-related figurative language comprehension in clinical populations: A critical review. SCRIPTA, Belo Horizonte, 20, 36–60.Google Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (2012). A deflationary account of metaphors. In Wilson, D. & Sperber, D. (Eds.), Meaning and relevance (pp. 97–122). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steen, G., Dorst, A., & Hermann, J. (2010). Metaphor in usage. Cognitive Linguistics, 21, 765–796. doi: 10.1515/cogl.2010.024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tager-Flusberg, H. (1992). Autistic children’s talk about psychological states: Deficits in the early acquisition of a theory of mind. Child Development, 63, 161–172. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1992.tb03604.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tager-Flusberg, H., Calkings, S., Nolin, T., Baumberger, T., Anderson, M., & Chadwick-Dias, D. (1990). A longitudinal study of language acquisition in autistic and Down’s syndrome children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 20, 1–21. doi: 10.1007/BF02206853CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thibodeau, P. H., Sikos, L., & Durgin, F. H. (2018). Are subjective ratings of metaphors a red herring? The big two dimensions of metaphoric sentences. Behavior Research Methods, 50, 759–772. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0903-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, B. (2007). Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and confidence intervals for effect sizes. Psychology in the Schools, 44, 423–432. doi: 10.1002/pits.20234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Utsumi, A., & Sakamoto, M. (2007). Computational evidence for two-stage categorization as a process of adjective metaphor comprehension. Paper presented at the 2nd European Cognitive Science Conference, Delphi, Greece, May 23–27.Google Scholar
Utsumi, A., & Sakamoto, M. (2011). Indirect categorization as a process of predicative metaphor comprehension. Metaphor and Symbol, 26, 299–313. doi: 10.1080/10926488.2011.609120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Herwegen, J., & Rundblad, G. (2018). A cross-sectional and longitudinal study of novel metaphor and metonymy comprehension in children, adolescents, and adults with autism spectrum disorder. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 945. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00945CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Varga, E., Schnell, Z., Tényi, T., Németh, N., Simon, M., Hajnal, A., … Herold, R. (2014). Compensatory effect of general cognitive skills on non-literal language processing in schizophrenia: A preliminary study. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 29, 1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2014.01.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermeulen, P. (2014). Context blindness in autism spectrum disorder: Not using the forest to see the trees as trees. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 30, 1–11. doi: 10.1177/1088357614528799Google Scholar
Vosniadou, S., Ortony, A., Reynolds, R. E., & Wilson, P. T. (1984). Sources of difficulty in the young child’s understanding of metaphorical language. Child Development, 55, 1588–1606. doi: 10.2307/1130028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vulchanova, M., Milburn, E., Vulchanov, V., & Baggio, G. (2019). Boon or burden? The role of compositional meaning in figurative language processing and acquisition. Journal of Logic, Language and Information. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1007/s10849-019-09282-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vulchanova, M., Saldaña, D., Chahboun, S., & Vulchanov, V. (2015). Figurative language processing in atypical populations: The ASD perspective. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 24. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00024CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, D. (2011). Parallels and differences in the treatment of metaphor in relevance theory and cognitive linguistics. Intercultural Pragmatics, 8, 177–196. doi: 10.2478/v10148-011-0025-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D., & Carston, R. (2006). Metaphor, relevance and the “emergent Property.” Mind & Language, 21, 404–433. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0017.2006.00284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winner, E. (1988). The point of words: Children’s understanding of metaphor and irony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Winner, E., Rosenstiel, A. K., & Gardner, H. (1976). The development of metaphoric understanding. Developmental Psychology, 12, 289–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Health Organization. (1992). The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: Clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organization. http://www.who.int/iris/handle/10665/37958Google Scholar
*Zheng, Q., Jia, Z., & Liang, D. (2015). Metaphor and metonymy comprehension in Chinese-speaking children with high-functioning autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 10, 51–58. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2014.11.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar