Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T22:23:43.645Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Article choice, theory of mind, and memory in children with high-functioning autism and children with specific language impairment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 November 2017

JEANNETTE SCHAEFFER ,
MEREL VAN WITTELOOSTUIJN  and
AVA CREEMERS
JEANNETTE SCHAEFFER*
Affiliation:
University of Amsterdam
MEREL VAN WITTELOOSTUIJN
Affiliation:
University of Amsterdam
AVA CREEMERS
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Jeannette Schaeffer, Department of Cultural Analysis & Linguistics, University of Amsterdam, Spuistraat 134, 1012 VB Amsterdam, The Netherlands. E-mail: j.c.schaeffer@uva.nl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Previous studies show that young, typically developing (TD) children (<age 5) and children with specific language impairment (SLI; >age 5) make errors in the choice between a definite and an indefinite article. Suggested explanations for overgeneration of the definite article include failure to distinguish speaker from hearer assumptions, and for overgeneration of the indefinite article failure to draw scalar implicatures, and weak working memory. However, no direct empirical evidence for these accounts is available. In this study, 27 Dutch-speaking children with high-functioning autism, 27 children with SLI, and 27 TD children aged 5–14 were administered a pragmatic article choice test, a nonverbal theory of mind test, and three types of memory tests (phonological memory, verbal, and nonverbal working memory). The results show that the children with high-functioning autism and SLI (a) make similar errors, that is, they overgenerate the indefinite article; (b) are TD-like at theory of mind, but (c) perform significantly more poorly than the TD children on phonological memory and verbal working memory. We propose that weak memory skills prevent the integration of the definiteness scale with the preceding discourse, resulting in the failure to consistently draw the relevant scalar implicature. This in turn yields the occasional erroneous choice of the indefinite article a in definite contexts.

Keywords

article choicehigh-functioning autismphonological and working memoryspecific language impairmenttheory of mind
Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , January 2018 , pp. 89 - 115
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abbott, B. (1999). Support for a unique theory of definiteness. In Matthews, T. & Strolovitch, D. (Eds.), Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory 9 (SALT) 9, pp. 1–15. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
Abbott, B. (2003). A reply to Szabó’s “Descriptions and uniqueness.” Philosophical Studies, 113, 223–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archibald, L. M., & Gathercole, S. E. (2006). Short-term and working memory in specific language impairment. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 41, 675–693.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Baddeley, A. (2003). Working memory: Looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 829–839.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 8, 47–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S. (1988). Social and pragmatic deficits in autism: Cognitive or affective? Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 18, 379–402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bennetto, L., Pennington, B. F., & Rogers, S. J. (1996). Intact and impaired memory functions in autism. Child Development, 67, 1816–1835.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bishop, D. V. M. (2000). Pragmatic language impairment: A correlate of SLI, a distinct subgroup, or part of the autistic continuum. In Bishop, D. V. M. & Leonard, L. V. (Eds.), Speech and language impairments in children: Causes, characteristics, intervention and outcome (pp. 99–113). East Sussex: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Bishop, D. V. M., Chan, J., Adams, C., Hartley, J., & Weir, F. (2000). Conversational responsiveness in specific language impairment: Evidence of disproportionate pragmatic difficulties in a subset of children. Development and Psychopathology, 12, 177–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, D. V., North, T., & Donlan, C. H. R. I. S. (1996). Nonword repetition as a behavioural marker for inherited language impairment: Evidence from a twin study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 37, 391–403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Botting, N., & Conti‐Ramsden, G. (2003). Autism, primary pragmatic difficulties, and specific language impairment: Can we distinguish them using psycholinguistic markers? Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 45, 515–524.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (1999). A nonverbal false belief task: The performance of children and great apes. Child Development, 70, 381–395.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carston, R. (1998). Informativeness, relevance and scalar implicature. In Carston, R. & Uschida, S. (Eds.), Relevance theory: Applications and implications (pp. 79–236). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chierchia, G. (2004). Scalar implicatures, polarity phenomena, and the syntax/pragmatics interface. Structures and Beyond, 3, 39–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chondrogianni, V., & Marinis, T. (2015). Production of definite and indefinite articles in typically developing English-speaking children and children with SLI. Lingua, 155, 9–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colle, L., Baron-Cohen, S., & Hill, J. (2007). Do children with autism have a theory of mind? A non-verbal test of autism vs. specific language impairment. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 716–723.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Cat, C. (2011). Information tracking and encoding in early L1: Linguistic competence vs. cognitive limitations. Journal of Child Language, 38, 828–860.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dollaghan, C., & Campbell, T. F. (1998). Nonword repetition and child language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 1136–1146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Durrleman, S., Burnel, M., Thommen, E., Foudon, N., Sonié, S., Reboul, A., & Fourneret, P. (2016). The language cognition interface in ASD: Complement sentences and false belief reasoning. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 21, 109–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eigsti, I. M., de Marchena, A. B., Schuh, J. M., & Kelley, E. (2011). Language acquisition in autism spectrum disorders: A developmental review. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 5, 681–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedmann, N., & Novogrodsky, R. (2008). Subtypes of SLI: SySLI, PhoSLI, LeSLI, and PraSLI. In Gavarró, A. & Freitas, M. J. (Eds.), Language acquisition and development (pp. 205–217). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Friedmann, N., & Novogrodsky, R. (2011). Which questions are most difficult to understand? The comprehension of Wh questions in three subtypes of SLI. Lingua, 121, 367–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frith, U. (1989). Autism: Explaining the enigma. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 3, 465–468.Google Scholar
Gathercole, S. E. (2006). Nonword repetition and word learning: The nature of the relationship. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 513–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gathercole, S. E., & Baddeley, A. D. (1990). Phonological memory deficits in language disordered children: Is there a causal connection? Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 336– 360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gathercole, S. E., Willis, C. S., Baddeley, A. D., & Emslie, H. (1994). The children's test of nonword repetition: A test of phonological working memory. Memory, 2, 103–127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geurts, H. M. (2007). Handleiding Nederlandse Children's Communicaton Checklist (2nd ed.). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
Girbau, D., & Schwartz, R. G. (2007). Non‐word repetition in Spanish‐speaking children with Specific Language Impairment (SLI). International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 42, 59–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gordishevsky, G., & Avrutin, S. (2004). Optional omissions in an optionally null subject language. In Kampen, J. van & Baauw, S. (Eds.), Proceedings of GALA 2003 (Vol. 1, pp. 187–198). LOT Occasional series 3. Utrecht: Utrecht University Press.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. & Morgan, J. (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Griffith, E. M., Pennington, B. F., Wehner, E. A., & Rogers, S. J. (1999). Executive functions in young children with autism. Child Development, 70, 817–832.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hawkins, J. A. (1991). On (in)definite articles: Implicatures and (un)grammaticality prediction. Journal of Linguistics, 27, 405–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heim, I. (1982). The semantics of definite and indefinite NPs (Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst).Google Scholar
Henry, L. A. (2001). How does the severity of a learning disability affect working memory performance? Memory, 9, 233–247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henry, L. A., Messer, D. J., & Nash, G. (2012). Executive functioning in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 53, 37–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horn, L. R. (1989). A natural history of negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Horn, L. R. (2006). Toward a Fregean pragmatics: Voraussetzung, Nebengedanke, Andeutung. In Horn, L. R. & Kecskes, I. (Eds.), Explorations in pragmatics: Linguistic, cognitive, and intercultural aspects (pp. 39–69). Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Janssen, B. E. (2016). The acquisition of gender and case in Polish and Russian: A study of monolingual and bilingual children (Doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam).Google Scholar
Joseph, R. M., Steele, S. D., Meyer, E., & Tager-Flusberg, H. (2005). Self-ordered pointing in children with autism: Failure to use verbal mediation in the service of working memory? Neuropsychologia, 43, 1400–1411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1979). A functional approach to child language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Keydeniers, D. J., Eliazer, J., & Schaeffer, J. C. (2017). Definite-indefinite article choice in Dutch child language. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
Kort, W., Schittekatte, M., & Compaan, E. (2008). CELF-4-NL: Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals-Vierde-Editie. Amsterdam: Pearson Assessment and Information.Google Scholar
Koshino, H., Carpenter, P. A., Minshew, N. J., Cherkassky, V. L., Keller, T. A., & Just, M. A. (2005). Functional connectivity in an fMRI working memory task in high-functioning autism. NeuroImage, 24, 810–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krämer, I. (2003). Reference of indefinite and pronominal noun phrases in a story context: English children's comprehension. In Beachley, B., Brown, A., & Conlin, F. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 449–460). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. (2000). Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, F. (2007). Theories of autism. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 41, 859–868.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luna, B., Minshew, N. J., Garver, K. E., Lazar, N. A., Thulborn, K. R., Eddy, W. F., & Sweeney, J. A. (2002). Neocortical system abnormalities in autism: An fMRI study of spatial working memory. Neurology, 59, 834–840.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maratsos, M. P. (1976). The use of definite and indefinite reference in young children: An experimental study of semantic acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, C. A. (2001). False belief understanding in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Communication Disorders, 34, 73–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montgomery, J. W. (2003). Working memory and comprehension in children with specific language impairment: What we know so far. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36, 221–231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ozonoff, S., & Strayer, D. L. (2001). Further evidence of intact working memory in autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31, 257–263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perovic, A., Modyanova, N., & Wexler, K. (2013a). Comprehension of reflexive and personal pronouns in children with autism: A syntactic or pragmatic deficit? Applied Psycholinguistics, 34, 813–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perovic, A., Modyanova, N., & Wexler, K. (2013b). Comparison of grammar in neurodevelopmental disorders: The case of binding in Williams syndrome and autism with and without language impairment. Language Acquisition, 2, 133–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polite, E. J., Leonard, L. B., & Roberts, F. D. (2011). The use of definite and indefinite articles by children with specific language impairment. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 13, 291–300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pouscoulous, N., Noveck, I. A., Politzer, G., & Bastide, A. (2007). A developmental investigation of processing costs in implicature production. Language Acquisition, 14, 347–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1, 515–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rispens, J., & Baker, A. (2012). Nonword repetition: The relative contributions of phonological short-term memory and phonological representations in children with language and reading impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55, 683–694.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russell, B. (1905). On denoting. Mind, 14, 479–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, J., Jarrold, C., & Henry, L. (1996). Working memory in children with autism and with moderate learning difficulties. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 37, 673–686.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schaeffer, J. (2016). Linguistic and cognitive abilities in children with specific language impairment as compared to children with high-functioning autism. Language Acquisition, 1–19. doi: 10.1080/10489223.2016.1188928 Google Scholar
Schaeffer, J., Hacohen, A., & Bernstein, A. (2003). On the acquisition of DP in English-speaking children with SLI. In Beachley, B., Brown, A., & Colin, F. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 716–726). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, J., & Matthewson, L. (2005). Grammar and pragmatics in the acquisition of article systems. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 23, 53–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schafer, R., & de Villiers, J. (2000). Imagining articles: What a and the can tell us about the emergence of DP. In LaMendola, M. & Scott, J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th annual Boston University conference on language development (Vol. 2, pp. 609–620). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Schuh, J. M., & Eigsti, I. M. (2012). Working memory, language skills, and autism symptomatology. Behavioral Sciences, 2, 207–218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (2002). Pragmatics, modularity and mind‐reading. Mind and Language, 17, 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stalnaker, R. (1974). Pragmatic presuppositions. In Munitz, M. K. & Unger, P. (Eds.), Semantics and philosophy (pp. 197–214). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Stalnaker, R. (1978). Assertion. In Cole, P. (Ed.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 9. Pragmatics (pp. 313–332). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Tager-Flusberg, H. (1989). A psycholinguistic perspective on language development in the autistic child. In Dawson, G. (Ed.), Autism: Nature, diagnosis, and treatment (pp. 92–115). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
van der Lely, H. K. (1998). SLI in children: Movement, economy, and deficits in the computational-syntactic system. Language Acquisition, 7, 161–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Hout, A., Harrigan, K., & de Villiers, J. (2010). Asymmetries in the acquisition of definite and indefinite NPs. Lingua, 120, 1973–1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verhagen, J., & Leseman, P. (2016). How do verbal short-term memory and working memory relate to the acquisition of vocabulary and grammar? A comparison between first and second language learners. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 141, 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vugs, B., Cuperus, J., Hendriks, M., & Verhoeven, L. (2013). Visuospatial working memory in specific language impairment: A meta-analysis. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 2586–2597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wechsler, D. (1974). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—Revised. New York: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Weismer, S. E., Evans, J., & Hesketh, L. J. (1999). An examination of verbal working memory capacity in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 1249–1260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weismer, S. E., Tomblin, J. B., Zhang, X., Buckwalter, P., Chynoweth, J. G., & Jones, M. (2000). Nonword repetition performance in school-age children with and without language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 865–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellman, H. M., Cross, D., & Watson, J. (2001). Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: The truth about false belief. Child Development, 72, 655–684.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westergaard, M. R. (2008). Verb movement and subject placement in the acquisition of word order: Pragmatics or structural economy? In Guijarro-Fuentes, P., Larranaga, M. P., & Clibbens, J. (Eds.), First language acquisition of morphology and syntax (pp. 61–86). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (2004). Experimental pragmatics. In Jackson, F. & Smith, M. (Eds.), Handbook of contemporary analytical philosophy (pp. 607–632). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception. Cognition, 13, 103–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zehler, A. M., & Brewer, W. F. (1982). Sequence and principles in article system use: An examination of A, The, and Null acquisition. Child Development, 53, 1268–1274.Google Scholar