Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T01:33:06.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Auditory cues that drive language development are language specific: Evidence from Cantonese

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 November 2014

MARK ANTONIOU ,
CAROL K. S. TO  and
PATRICK C. M. WONG
MARK ANTONIOU
Affiliation:
Chinese University of Hong Kong
CAROL K. S. TO
Affiliation:
University of Hong Kong
PATRICK C. M. WONG*
Affiliation:
Chinese University of Hong Kong and Northwestern University
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Patrick C. M. Wong, Department of Linguistics and Modern Languages, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Leung Kau Kui Building, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong SAR, China. E-mail: p.wong@cuhk.edu.hk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The mechanisms that allow for both language-specific and universal constraints in language development are not fully understood. According to the rhythm detection hypothesis, sensitivity to rhythm is the underlying mechanism that is fundamental to language development. Support from a number of Western languages, as well as Mandarin, has led to the proposal that rhythm detection may provide a language-universal account of language development. However, claims of universality may be premature because most research has addressed reading (rather than language) development, only a small number of languages have been investigated, and pitch is a better predictor of reading than rhythm in Mandarin children. Therefore, we examined language development using a narrative story-retelling task in children who speak Cantonese (a more complex tone inventory than Mandarin) and also assessed temporal and pitch-based auditory abilities to consider whether temporal processing drives development in a tone language. Both temporal and pitch abilities correlated with language development, but only pitch explained unique variance in language after age. The findings support the role of basic auditory processing mechanisms in language development, but they extend beyond the rhythm detection hypothesis by demonstrating that the fundamental cues for development are dependent on the specific processing demands of each language, rather than being universal.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 36 , Issue 6 , November 2015 , pp. 1493 - 1507
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bendor, D., & Wang, X. (2005). The neuronal representation of pitch in primate auditory cortex. Nature, 436, 1161–1165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bishop, D. V. M., Carlyon, R. P., Deeks, J. M., & Bishop, S. J. (1999). Auditory temporal processing impairment: Neither necessary nor sufficient for causing language impairment in children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 1295–1310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bishop, D. V. M., & Edmundson, A. (1987). Language-impaired 4-year-olds: Distinguishing transient from persistent impairment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 52, 156–173.Google Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2001). Praat: A system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International, 5, 341–345.Google Scholar
Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. (2004). Children's reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandrasekaran, B., Kraus, N., & Wong, P. C. M. (2012). Human inferior colliculus activity relates to individual differences in spoken language learning. Journal of Neurophysiology, 107, 1325–1336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chang, C.-J. (2006). Linking early narrative skill to later language and reading ability in Mandarin-speaking children: A longitudinal study over eight years. Narrative Inquiry, 16, 275–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgiou, G. K., Protopapas, A., Papadopoulos, T. C., Skaloumbakas, C., & Parrila, R. (2010). Auditory temporal processing and dyslexia in an orthographically consistent language. Cortex, 46, 1330–1344.Google Scholar
Goswami, U. (2011). A temporal sampling framework for developmental dyslexia. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 3–10.Google Scholar
Goswami, U., Gerson, D., & Astruc, L. (2010). Amplitude envelope perception, phonology and prosodic sensitivity in children with developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 23, 995–1019.Google Scholar
Goswami, U., Thomson, J. M., Richardson, U., Stainthorp, R., Hughes, D., Rosen, S., et al. (2002). Amplitude envelope onsets and developmental dyslexia: A new hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99, 10911–10916.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goswami, U., Wang, H.-L. S., Cruz, A., Fosker, T., Mead, N., & Huss, M. (2011). Language-universal sensory deficits in developmental dyslexia: English, Spanish, and Chinese. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 325–337.Google Scholar
Hall, D. A., & Plack, C. J. (2009). Pitch processing sites in the human auditory brain. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 576–585.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hämäläinen, J. A., Leppänen, P. H. T., Eklund, K., Thomson, J. M., Richardson, U., Guttorm, T. K., et al. (2009). Common variance in amplitude envelope perception tasks and their impact on phoneme duration perception and reading and spelling in Finnish children with reading disabilities. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30, 511–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, J., & Holt, L. L. (2009). General perceptual contributions to lexical tone normalization. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125, 3983–3994.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huss, M., Verney, J. P., Fosker, T., Mead, N., & Goswami, U. (2011). Music, rhythm, rise time perception and developmental dyslexia: Perception of musical meter predicts reading and phonology. Cortex, 47, 674–689.Google Scholar
Johnston, J. R. (2007). Thinking about child language: Research to practice. Eau Claire, WI: Thinking Publications.Google Scholar
Johnston, J. R., & Ellis-Weismer, S. (1983). Mental rotation abilities in language-disordered children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 26, 397–403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liles, B. Z. (1993). Narrative discourse in children with language disorders and children with normal language: A critical review of the literature. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 36, 868–882.Google Scholar
Lum, J. A. G., Conti-Ramsden, G., Page, D., & Ullman, M. T. (2012). Working, declarative and procedural memory in specific language impairment. Cortex, 48, 1138–1154.Google Scholar
MacNeilage, P. F., & Davis, B. L. (2000). On the origin of internal structure of word forms. Science, 288, 527–531.Google Scholar
Maddieson, I. (1984). Patterns of sounds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, J. G., Williams, M. C., & Dunlap, W. P. (1988). Temporal order judgements in good and poor readers. Neuropsychologia, 26, 917–924.Google Scholar
McGivern, R. F., Berka, C., Languis, M. L., & Chapman, S. (1991). Detection of deficits in temporal pattern discrimination using the seashore rhythm test in young children with reading impairments. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 58–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merritt, D. D., & Liles, B. Z. (1987). Story grammar ability in children with and without language disorder: Story generation, story retelling, and story comprehension. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 30, 539–552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merzenich, M. M., Jenkins, W. M., Johnston, P., Schreiner, C., Miller, S. L., & Tallal, P. (1996). Temporal processing deficits of language-learning impaired children ameliorated by training. Science, 271, 77–81.Google Scholar
Mody, M., Studdert-Kennedy, M., & Brady, S. (1997). Speech perception deficits in poor readers: Auditory processing or phonological coding? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 64, 199–231.Google Scholar
Muneaux, M., Ziegler, J. C., Truc, C., Thomson, J., & Goswami, U. (2004). Deficits in beat perception and dyslexia: Evidence from French. NeuroReport, 15, 1255–1259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newman, T. M., Macomber, D., Naples, A. J., Babitz, T., Volkmar, F., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2007). Hyperlexia in children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 760–774.Google Scholar
Papadopoulos, T. C., Georgiou, G. K., & Parrila, R. K. (2012). Low-level deficits in beat perception: Neither necessary nor sufficient for explaining developmental dyslexia in a consistent orthography. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 33, 1841–1856.Google Scholar
Ramus, F., Rosen, S., Dakin, S. C., Day, B. L., Castellote, J. M., White, S., et al. (2003). Theories of developmental dyslexia: Insights from a multiple case study of dyslexic adults. Brain, 126, 841–865.Google Scholar
Reilly, J., Losh, M., Bellugi, U., & Wulfeck, B. (2004). “Frog, where are you?” Narratives in children with specific language impairment, early focal brain injury, and Williams syndrome. Brain and Language, 88, 229–247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosen, S. (2003). Auditory processing in dyslexia and specific language impairment: Is there a deficit? What is its nature? Does it explain anything? Journal of Phonetics, 31, 509–527.Google Scholar
Scarborough, H. S., Catts, H. W., & Kamhi, A. G. (2005). Developmental relationships between language and reading: Reconciling a beautiful hypothesis with some ugly facts. In Catts, W. H. & Kamhi, A. G. (Eds.), The connections between language and reading disabilities (pp. 3–24). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Shannon, R. V., Zeng, F.-G., Kamath, V., Wygonski, J., & Ekelid, M. (1995). Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues. Science, 270, 303–304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shu, H., Peng, H., & McBride-Chang, C. (2008). Phonological awareness in young Chinese children. Developmental Science, 11, 171–181.Google Scholar
Snowling, M. J. (2000). Language and literacy skills: Who is at risk and why? In Bishop, D. V. M. & Leonard, L. B. (Eds.), Speech and language impairments in children: Causes, characteristics, intervention and outcome (pp. 245–259). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
So, D., & Siegel, L. S. (1997). Learning to read Chinese: Semantic, syntactic, phonological and working memory skills in normally achieving and poor Chinese readers. Reading and Writing, 9, 1–21.Google Scholar
Surányi, Z., Csépe, V., Richardson, U., Thomson, J., Honbolygó, F., & Goswami, U. (2009). Sensitivity to rhythmic parameters in dyslexic children: A comparison of Hungarian and English. Reading and Writing, 22, 41–56.Google Scholar
Tabors, P. O., Snow, C. E., & Dickinson, D. K. (2001). Homes and schools together: Supporting language and literacy development. In Dickinson, D. K. & Tabors, P. O. (Eds.), Beginning literacy with language: Young children learning at home and school (pp. 313–334). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Tallal, P. (2004). Improving language and literacy is a matter of time. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 721–728.Google Scholar
Tallal, P., Merzenich, M. M., Miller, S., & Jenkins, W. (1998). Language learning impairments: Integrating basic science, technology, and remediation. Experimental Brain Research, 123, 210–219.Google Scholar
Tallal, P., & Piercy, M. (1973). Defects of non-verbal auditory perception in children with developmental aphasia. Nature, 241, 468–469.Google Scholar
Tan, L. H., Spinks, J. A., Eden, G. F., Perfetti, C. A., & Siok, W. T. (2005). Reading depends on writing, in Chinese. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 8781–8785.Google Scholar
To, C. K. S., Stokes, S. F., Cheung, H.-T., & T'sou, B. (2010). Narrative assessment for Cantonese-speaking children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53, 648–669.Google Scholar
T'sou, B., Lee, T. H. T., Tung, P., Man, Y., Chan, A., & To, C. K. S. (2006). Hong Kong Cantonese Oral Language Assessment Scale. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong, Language Information Sciences Research Centre.Google Scholar
van der Lely, H. K. J., Rosen, S., & Adlard, A. (2004). Grammatical language impairment and the specificity of cognitive domains: Relations between auditory and language abilities. Cognition, 94, 167–183.Google Scholar
Wallach, G. P., & Butler, K. G. (1994). Language learning disabilities in school-age children and adolescents. New York: Merrill.Google Scholar
Wong, A. M.-Y., Ciocca, V., & Yung, S. (2009). The perception of lexical tone contrasts in Cantonese children with and without specific language impairment (SLI). Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52, 1493–1509.Google Scholar
Wong, P. C. M., Ciocca, V., Chan, A. H. D., Ha, L. Y. Y., Tan, L.-H., & Peretz, I. (2012). Effects of culture on musical pitch perception. PLOS ONE, 7, e33424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wong, P. C. M., Parsons, L. M., Martinez, M., & Diehl, R. L. (2004). The role of the insular cortex in pitch pattern perception: The effect of linguistic contexts. Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 9153–9160.Google Scholar
Wong, P. C. M., Warrier, C. M., Penhune, V. B., Roy, A. K., Sadehh, A., Parrish, T. B., et al. (2008). Volume of left Heschl's gyrus and linguistic pitch learning. Cerebral Cortex, 18, 828–836.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yeung, H. H., Chen, K. H., & Werker, J. F. (2013). When does native language input affect phonetic perception? The precocious case of lexical tone. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 123–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziegler, J. C., Pech-Georgel, C., George, F., Alario, F.-X., & Lorenzi, C. (2005). Deficits in speech perception predict language learning impairment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 14110–14115.Google Scholar