Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T16:47:19.078Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dysfunctional attitudes in depressed and recovered depressed patients and their first-degree relatives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

M. J. Power ,
C. F. Duggan ,
A. S. Lee  and
R. M. Murray
M. J. Power*
Affiliation:
MRC Social and Community Psychiatry Unit and Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway; Genetics Section, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry and King's College Hospital, London; Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital, Nottingham
C. F. Duggan
Affiliation:
MRC Social and Community Psychiatry Unit and Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway; Genetics Section, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry and King's College Hospital, London; Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital, Nottingham
A. S. Lee
Affiliation:
MRC Social and Community Psychiatry Unit and Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway; Genetics Section, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry and King's College Hospital, London; Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital, Nottingham
R. M. Murray
Affiliation:
MRC Social and Community Psychiatry Unit and Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway; Genetics Section, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry and King's College Hospital, London; Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital, Nottingham
*
1Address for correspondence: Dr M. J. Power, Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham TW20 0EX.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

A series of depressed probands and their first-degree relatives were categorized as follows: (a) currently depressed; (b) recovered depressed; and (c) never-ill relatives. Their scores on a subscaled version of the Dysfunctional Attitude Scale (the DAS-24) were compared. The DAS total scores mirrored previous findings in that the total scores for recovered individuals returned to normal or near-normal levels. However, the dependency subscale scores remained elevated for the recovered depressed group. It is proposed that these results support the conclusion that self-report measures of cognitive vulnerability should focus on specific rather than global effects, if progress is to be made in the search for true vulnerability factors.

Type
Research Article
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , January 1995 , pp. 87 - 93
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrews, B. & Brown, G. W. (1993). Self-esteem and vulnerability to depression: the concurrent validity of interview and questionnaire measures. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 102, 565–572.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beck, A. T. (1983). Cognitive therapy of depression: new perspectives. In Treatment of Depression: Old Controversies and New Approaches (ed. Clayton, P. and Barrett, J.), pp. 265–284. Raven: New York.Google Scholar
Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J. & Erbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry 5, 462–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, A. T., Rush, A. J., Shaw, B. F. & Emery, G. (1979). Cognitive Therapy of Depression: A Treatment Manual. Guilford Press: New York.Google Scholar
Beck, A. T., Brown, G., Steer, R. A. & Weissman, A. N. (1991). Factor analysis of the Dysfunctional Attitude Scale in a clinical population. Psychological Assessment 3, 478–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bibring, E. (1953). The mechanism of depression. In Affective Disorders: Psychoanalytic Contribution to Their Study (ed. Greenacre, P.), pp. 13–48. International Universities Press: New York.Google Scholar
Blaney, P. H. & Kutcher, G. S. (1991). Measures of depressive dimensions: are they interchangeable? Journal of Personality Assessment 56, 502–512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blatt, S. J. (1974). Levels of object representation in anaclitic and introjective depression. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child 29, 107–157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dohr, K. B., Rush, A. J. & Bernstein, I. H. (1989). Cognitive biases and depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 98, 263–267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duggan, C. F., Lee, A. S. & Murray, R. M. (1990). Does personality predict long-term outcome in depression? British Journal of Psychiatry 157, 19–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duggan, C. F., Lee, A. S. & Murray, R. M. (1991). Do different subtypes of hospitalized depressives have different long-term outcomes? Archives of General Psychiatry 48, 308–312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duggan, C. F., Sham, P., Lee, A., Minne, C. & Murray, R. (1995). Neuroticism: a marker for vulnerability to depression? Evidence from a family study. (Submitted.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1964). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Inventory. University of London Press: London.Google Scholar
Gotlib, I. H. & McCann, C. D. (1984). Construct accessibility and depression: an examination of cognitive and affective factors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 47, 427–439.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henderson, A. S., Byrne, D. G. & Duncan-Jones, P. (1981). Neurosis and the Social Environment. Academic Press: Sydney.Google Scholar
Hirschfeld, R. M. A., Klerman, G. L., Keller, M. B., Andreasen, N. C. & Clayton, P. J. (1986). Personality of recovered patients with bipolar affective disorder. Journal of Affective Disorders 11, 81–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Imber, S. D., Pilkonis, P. A., Sotsky, S. M., Elkin, I., Watkins, J. T., Collins, J. F., Shea, M. T., Leber, W. R. & Glass, D. R. (1990). Mode-specific effects among three treatments for depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 58, 352–359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katz, R. & McGuffin, P. (1987). Neuroticism in familial depression. Psychological Medicine 17, 155–161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kendall, P. C., Hollon, S. D., Beck, A. T., Hammen, C. L. & Ingram, R. E. (1987). Issues and recommendations regarding use of the Beck Depression Inventory. Cognitive Therapy and Research 11, 289–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendell, R. E. (1968). The Classification of Depressive Illnesses. Institute of Psychiatry Maudsley Monograph No. 18. Oxford University Press: London.Google Scholar
Kendler, K. S. (1990). The super-normal control group in psychiatric genetics: possible artifactual evidence for coaggregation. Psychiatric Genetics 1, 45–53.Google Scholar
Lee, A. S. & Murray, R. M. (1988). The long-term outcome of Maudsley depressives. British Journal of Psychiatry 153, 741–751.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miranda, J. & Persons, J. B. (1988). Dysfunctional attitudes are mood-state dependent. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 97, 76–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Myers, L. B., Brewin, C. R. & Power, M. J. (1992). Depression and autobiographical memory. In Theoretical Perspectives on Autobiographical Memory (ed. Conway, M. A., Rubin, D. C., Spinnler, H. and Wagenaar, W. A.), pp. 375–390. Kluwer: Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nisbett, R. E. & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review 84, 231–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Power, M. J. (1990). A prime time for emotion: cognitive vulnerability and the emotional disorders. In Lines of Thinking. Vol. 2. (ed. Gilhooly, K. J., Keane, M. T. G., Logie, R. H. and Erdos, G.), pp. 157–165. Wiley: Chichester.Google Scholar
Power, M. J. (1991). Cognitive science and behavioural psychotherapy: where behaviour was, there shall cognition be? Behavioural Psychotherapy 19, 20–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Power, M. J. & Champion, L. A. (1986). Cognitive approaches to depression: a theoretical critique. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 25, 201–212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Power, M. J. & Brewin, C. R. (1990). Self-esteem regulation in an emotional priming task. Cognition and Emotion 4, 34–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Power, M. K., Katz, R., McGuffin, P., Duggan, C. F., Lam, D. & Beck, A. T. (1994). The Dysfunctional Attitude Scale (DAS): a comparison of forms A and B and proposals for a new subscaled version. Journal of Research in Personality 28, 263–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the Adolescent Self-image. Princeton University Press: Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spitzer, R. L. & Endicott, J. S. (1979). Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia (SADS), 3rd edn. New York State Psychiatric Institute, Biometrics Research Division: New York.Google Scholar
Weinberger, D. A., Schwartz, G. E. & Davidson, R. J. (1979). Low-anxious, high anxious and repressive coping styles: psychometric patterns and behavioural responses to stress. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 88, 369–380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weissman, A. N. & Beck, A. T. (1978). Development and validation of the Dysfunctional Attitude Scale: a preliminary investigation. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Toronto. Google Scholar