Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T06:41:41.159Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Investigation of the timed ‘Up & Go’ test in children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2005

Elizabeth N Williams
Affiliation:
School of Physiotherapy, University of Melbourne, Austin Health, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Sara G Carroll
Affiliation:
School of Physiotherapy, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Western Australia.
Dinah S Reddihough
Affiliation:
Department of Child Development and Rehabilitation, Royal Children's Hospital and Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Australia.
Bev A Phillips
Affiliation:
School of Physiotherapy, University of Melbourne, Austin Health, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Mary P Galea
Affiliation:
School of Physiotherapy, University of Melbourne, Austin Health, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Get access

Abstract

The timed ‘Up & Go’ test (TUG) is a test of basic or functional mobility in adults which has rarely been used in children. Functional mobility was defined for this study as an individual's ability to manoeuvre his or her body capably and independently to accomplish everyday tasks. Reliability and validity of TUG scores were examined in 176 children without physical disabilities (94 males, 82 females; mean age 5y 9mo [SD 1y 8mo]; range 3 to 9y) and in 41 young people with physical disabilities due to cerebral palsy or spina bifida (20 males, 21 females; mean age 8y 11mo [SD 4y 3mo], range 3 to 19y). Mean TUG score for children without physical disability was 5.9s (SD 1.3). Reliability of the TUG test was high, with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) of 0.89 within session, and 0.83 for test–retest reliability. Mean score of the group aged 3 to 5 years was significantly higher (6.7s SD 1.2) than that of the older group (5.1s, SD 0.8; p=0.001). Scores in the younger group reduced significantly over a 5-month follow-up period (p=0.001), indicating that the TUG was responsive to change. Within-session reliability of the TUG in young people with disabilities was very high (ICC=0.99). There were significant differences in TUG scores between children classified at levels I, II, and III of the Gross Motor Function Classification System (p=0.001). TUG scores showed a moderate negative correlation with scores on the Standing and Walking dimensions of the Gross Motor Function Measure (n=22, rho=–0.52, p=0.012). There was no significant difference in TUG scores between typically developing male and female children. The TUG can be used reliably in children as young as 3 years using the protocol described in this paper. It is a meaningful, quick, and practical objective measure of functional mobility. With further investigation, the TUG is potentially useful as a screening test, an outcome measure in intervention studies for young people with disabilities, a measure of disability, and as a measure of change in functional mobility over time.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
© 2005 Mac Keith Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)