Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T06:19:06.238Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Rejection Sensitivity and Adolescent Romantic Relationships

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2014

Geraldine Downey
Affiliation:
Columbia University
Cheryl Bonica
Affiliation:
Columbia University
Claudia Rincón
Affiliation:
Columbia University
Wyndol Furman
Affiliation:
University of Denver
B. Bradford Brown
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Candice Feiring
Affiliation:
New Jersey Medical School
Get access

Summary

A key function of romantic relationships is to make people feel accepted and loved, thus promoting well-being. Yet, many relationships do not serve this function. Adults give relationship difficulties as the most common reason for seeking therapy (Veroff, Kulka, & Douvan, 1981). People in conflicted marriages are often depressed (Coyne, Downey, & Boergers, 1994), and intimate violence is a leading cause of injuries to both adult and adolescent women (Browne, 1993; Centers for Disease Control, 1990). Because troubled romantic relationships are both pervasive and costly, there is considerable interest in understanding how relationships are undermined.

Initially, research on the causes of troubled intimate relationships focused on married couples. It is now clear that the destructive interactional patterns that undermine marriages are evident in adult dating relationships and may be present in adolescent relationships. Intimate violence is a case in point. Minor dating violence precedes serious marital violence in 25% to 50% of cases (Gayford, 1975; O'Leary & Arias, 1988; Roscoe & Benaske, 1985). The level of violence in adult dating relationships is similar to that found in marital relationships (Sugarman & Hotaling, 1989). Reported rates of dating violence in high school students range from 9% to 45% (Bergman, 1992; Downey, Lebolt, & O'Shea-Lauber, 1995; Henton, Cate, Koval, Lloyd, & Christopher, 1983; Molidor, 1993; O'Keefe, Brockopp, & Chew, 1986; Roscoe & Callahan, 1985; Roscoe, & Kelsey, 1986).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×