Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T01:50:24.148Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - The Korean research tradition on wang-ta

from Part I - Social awareness and research on bullying and cyberbullying

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2016

Peter K. Smith
Affiliation:
Goldsmiths, University of London
Keumjoo Kwak
Affiliation:
Seoul National University
Yuichi Toda
Affiliation:
Osaka Kyoiku University, Japan
Get access

Summary

This chapter introduces the concept of Korean bullying and its characteristics. It starts with a brief history. Only recently has the issue been addressed by the South Korean academic community. In the beginning, although bullying phenomena existed, the term for it was unspecified. Research started using the term gipdan-ttadolim, meaning group isolation, but since 2001, it became broadly known as wang-ta. Still at relatively early stages of research, the studies are mainly focused on obtaining a broad, overall understanding of wang-ta in the South Korean context. Some empirical findings are reviewed, on prevalence, age differences, and gender differences. Characteristics of wang-ta are considered such as the number of aggressors, who bullies who, and varying levels of social isolation. There is a section on perceptions of bullying including the phenomenon of blaming the victim; and what pupils do, when they bully others, when they are victimized, and when they witness victimization. What pupils think about prevention is considered. A final section is on factors related to bullying involvement: individual, home environment, school and peer, and social and cultural factors; and their relative effects.
Type
Chapter
Information
School Bullying in Different Cultures
Eastern and Western Perspectives
, pp. 93 - 112
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Björkqvist, K., Lagerspetz, K. M. and Kaukiainen, A. (1992). Do girls manipulate and boys fight? Developmental trends in regard to direct and indirect aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 18, 117127.3.0.CO;2-3>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowers, L., Smith, P.K. and Binney, V. (1994). Perceived family relationships of bullies, victims, and bully/victims in middle childhood. Journal of Social and Personal Relationship, 11, 215232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, Y. and Kim, A. (2003). A study on middle school students’ bullying behaviors in relations to self-concept and attribution style. The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 17, 149166.Google Scholar
Dong-a ilbo (1997). 80% middle school pupils use slang, 52% use habitually. March 26th. Retrieved 10 November 2015, from http://news.donga.com/3/all/19970326/7242621/1.Google Scholar
FPYV (Foundation for Preventing Youth Violence) (2006). 2006 The national survey of hakkyo-pokryuk in Korea. Seoul: Foundation for Preventing Youth Violence.Google Scholar
FPYV (Foundation for Preventing Youth Violence) (2008). 2007 The national survey on the state of school violence. Seoul: Foundation for Preventing Youth Violence.Google Scholar
FPYV (Foundation for Preventing Youth Violence) (2010). 2009 The national survey report on school violence in Korea. Seoul: Foundation for Preventing Youth Violence.Google Scholar
FPYV (Foundation for Preventing Youth Violence) (2011). 2010 Summary report of the national survey of school violence. Retrieved 10 November 2015, from www.edujikim.com/customercenter/board/default/view_b.asp?intBbsSeq=8&Page=1&intArticleSeq=8234.Google Scholar
FPYV (Foundation for Preventing Youth Violence) (2012). 2011 The national research on school violence. Seoul: Foundation for Preventing Youth Violence.Google Scholar
FPYV (Foundation for Preventing Youth Violence) (2013). 2012 The national research of school violence. Seoul: Foundation for Preventing Youth Violence.Google Scholar
Georgiou, S. N. (2008). Bullying and victimization at school: The role of mothers. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 109125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Georgiou, S. N., Fousiani, K., Michaelides, M. and Stavrinides, P. (2013). Cultural value orientation and authoritarian parenting as parameters of bullying and victimisation at school. International Journal of Psychology, 48, 6978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hwang, H., Shin, J. and Park, H. (2006). The path analysis among selected eco-systemic factors on the school violence of Korean early adolescents. Journal of Korean Council for Children’s Rights, 10, 497526.Google Scholar
Jun, M. (2008). The comparison between the self-conception of group-bullying students and that of victimized students according to the subject of recognition. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 8, 7189.Google Scholar
Kim, H. and Lee, H. (2000). Social and psychological variables affecting the behaviors of bullies and victims of school bullying. Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 14, 4564.Google Scholar
Kim, S. (2005). Psychological and social factors influencing bullying and victim tendencies. Korean Journal of Counseling, 6, 359371.Google Scholar
Kim, S. (2007). A study on the relationships among family, school, peers-related variables, and school violence. Korean Journal of Youth Studies, 14, 101126.Google Scholar
Kim, Y. and Park, H. (1997). Pupils who do ttadolim and pupils who received ttadolim. Seoul: Youth Communication Plaza.Google Scholar
Koo, B. Y. (1997). Reason of gipdan-ttadolim in youths and instructions for prevention. Korean Youth Counselling Institute, 29, Seoul: Youth Communication Plaza.Google Scholar
Koo, H. (2005). The nature of school bullying in South Korea. Unpublished PhD thesis. London: Goldsmiths, University of London.Google Scholar
Koo, H., Kwak, K. and Smith, P. K. (2008). Victimisation in Korean schools: The nature, incidence and distinctive features of Korean bullying or wang-ta. Journal of School Violence, 7, 119139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwon, J. M. (1999). Conceptualization of wangtta in Korea and methodological review of wangtta researches. Korean Journal of Psychology: Social Issues, 5, 5972.Google Scholar
Lee, B. (2007). The effects of parenting behavior on self-esteem, aggression, school violence experience, violence tolerance as perceived by adolescence. Journal of School Social Work, 13, 2550.Google Scholar
Lee, C. and Kwak, K. (2000). Gipdan-ttadolim at school: An actual condition and characteristics. Seoul: Gipmoondang.Google Scholar
Lee, C-H. and Song, J. (2009). An ecological approach to bullying: A comparative study between South Korea and the United States. Korean Criminology, 3, 103143.Google Scholar
Lee, E. (2007). Perceptions of children and parents toward school violence in elementary school. Journal of Korean Council for Children’s Rights, 11, 291318.Google Scholar
Lee, H-K. and Hong, Y-O. (2002). The characteristics of Korean wang-ta phenomena -the process of behavioral decision making of school violence: The application of Fishbein theory. Studies in Victimology, 10, 101122.Google Scholar
Lee, S. (2006). A study on influence factor of juveniles school violence. Korean Association for Public Security Administration, 2, 5378.Google Scholar
Lee, S-H. (2011). Bullying-like behaviours in South Korea: Terms used, origins in early childhood and links to moral reasoning. Unpublished PhD thesis. London: Goldsmiths, University of London.Google Scholar
Lee, S-H., Smith, P. K. and Monks, C. P. (2011). Perceptions of bullying-like phenomena in South Korea: A qualitative approach from a lifespan perspective. Journal of Aggression, Conflict, and Peace Research, 3, 209221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S-H., Smith, P. K. and Monks, C. (2012). Meaning and usage of a term for bullying-like phenomena in South Korea: A lifespan perspective. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 31, 342349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nesdale, D. and Naito, M. (2005). Individualism-collectivism and the attitudes to school bullying of Japanese and Australian students. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, 537556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nho, C. and Lee, S. (2003). A study on predictive factors for school violence among junior high school students: Focusing on intraparental violence, child abuse, internal locus of control, and perception of school life. School Social Work, 6, 135.Google Scholar
No, S. (2001). Harmful consequences of gipdan-ttadolim. Victimology, 9, 529.Google Scholar
No, S., Kim, S., Lee, D. and Kim, J. (1999). A study of adolescents’ gipdan-ttadolim. Seoul: Korean Institute of Criminology.Google Scholar
Park, G., Son, H. and Song, H. (1998). Study of pupils’ wang-ta phenomenon (gipdan-ttadolim and gorophim). (RR 98-19). Seoul: Korean Educational Development Institute.Google Scholar
Park, H., Jung, M., Park, J. and Han, S. (2006). A study of hakkyo-pokryuk (RR 2006-08-04). Seoul: Korean Educational Development Institute.Google Scholar
Park, J. and Chae, K. (2011). The role of parenting behaviors, child’s communication and problem solving skills in bullying/being bullied. The Korean Journal of Psychology, 30, 4567.Google Scholar
Salmivalli, C. and Kaukiainen, A. (2004). ‘Female aggression’ revisited: Variable and person-centered approaches to studying gender differences in different types of aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 30, 258163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheithauer, H., Hayer, T., Petermann, F. and Jugert, G. (2006). Physical, verbal, and relational forms of bullying among German students: age trends, gender differences, and correlates. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 261275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shin, D. (2012). A study of psychological school violence in an elementary school child. Association of Criminal Psychology, 8, 105138.Google Scholar
Shin, H. (2006). A study on the continual development of aggressive victims, passive victims, and bullies. Studies on Korean Youth, 17, 297323.Google Scholar
Shin, J-H., Hong, J. S., Yoon, J. and Espelage, D. L. (2014). Interparental conflict, parenting behavior, and children’s friendship quality as correlates of peer aggression and peer victimization among aggressor/victim subgroups in South Korea. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, XX, 120.Google Scholar
Smith, P. K., Madsen, K. C. and Moody, J. C. (1999). What causes the age decline in reports of being bullied at school? Towards a developmental analysis of risks of being bullied. Educational Research, 41, 267285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tippett, N. and Kwak, K. (2012). Cyberbullying in South Korea. In Li, Q., Cross, D. and Smith, P. K. (Eds.), Cyberbullying in the global playground: Research from international perspectives (pp. 202219). Chichester, England: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, S. (2009). Pupils awareness and prevalence of hakkyo-pokryuk. Unpublished Master thesis, Gwangju, South Korea: Chonnam National University.Google Scholar
Yom, Y. (2011). A study on difference of school bullying and school bully-victim groups mediating effects of self-esteem. Journal of Future Oriented Youth Society, 8, 117136.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×