Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ws8qp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-27T12:06:59.662Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Turkish family structure and functioning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

Sevda Bekman
Affiliation:
Bogaziçi University, Istanbul
Ayhan Aksu-Koç
Affiliation:
Bogaziçi University, Istanbul
Get access

Summary

A former student and a current colleague of Çiğdem Kağıtçıbaşı, I have found myself ever inspired by her character and her theoretical work. Originally a non-psychology major, the course of my professional life changed dramatically when Kağıtçıbaşı introduced me to social psychology and cultural influences on human behavior. Raised in a “family of psychological interdependence” with an autonomous-related self, I have been very much intrigued by her Model of Family Change, which guided the present chapter.

Turkey is at the crossroads between the East and the West, characterized by much heterogeneity and social change. This has led to the emergence of many Turkish family prototypes (Ataca 2006; Sunar and Fişek 2005). In general, they could be categorized under two prototypes, namely, the traditional family of interdependence and the family of psychological (emotional) interdependence based on Kağıtçıbaşı's (1990, 1996, 2007) Model of Family Change. Kağıtçıbaşı's model distinguishes among three prototypical family patterns. The first, “family model of interdependence,” is more common in less developed, rural, agrarian contexts with “cultures of relatedness” or collectivism and is characterized by both psychological and material interdependencies in the family system. The contrasting pattern of “family model of independence” is more common in western industrial urban settings with individualistic cultures in which both dependencies are low. A third pattern, the “family model of psychological (emotional) interdependence,” is a synthesis of the first two patterns and characterizes the urban and more developed socio-economic contexts with cultures of relatedness, in which psychological interdependencies continue, while material interdependencies weaken.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abadan-Unat, N., Women in the Developing World: Evidence from Turkey (Colorado: University of Denver, 1986).Google Scholar
Albert, I., Trommsdorff, G., Mayer, B., and Schwarz, B., “Value of children in urban and rural Indonesia: Socio-demographic indicators, cultural aspects and empirical findings,” in Trommsdorff, G. and Nauck, B. (eds.), The Value of Children in Cross-cultural Perspective: Case Studies from Eight Societies (Berlin: Pabst Science, 2005), pp. 171–208).Google Scholar
Ataca, B., “Turkey,” in Georgas, J., Berry, J. W., Vijver, F. J. R., Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç., and Poortinga, Y. (eds.), Families across Cultures: A 30-nation Psychological Study (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), pp. 467–74.Google Scholar
Ataca, B. and Sunar, D., “Continuity and change in Turkish urban family life,” Psychology and Developing Societies, 11 (1999), 77–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ataca, B., Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç., and Diri, A., “The Turkish family and the value of children: Trends over time,” in Trommsdorff, G. and Nauck, B. (eds.), The Value of Children in Cross-cultural Perspective: Case Studies from Eight Societies (Berlin: Pabst, 2005), pp. 91–119.Google Scholar
Aytaç, I. A., “Intergenerational living arrangements in Turkey,”Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 13 (1998), 241–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baştuğ, S., “Household and family in Turkey: An historical perspective,” in Özdalga, E. and Liljestrom, R. (eds.), Autonomy and Dependence in Family: Turkey and Sweden in Critical Perspective(Istanbul: Swedish Research Institute, 2002), pp. 99–115.Google Scholar
Berik, G., “Towards an understanding of gender hierarchy in Turkey: A comparative analysis of carpet-weaving villages,” in Tekeli, Ş. (ed.), Women in Modern Turkish Society: A Reader (London: Zed Books, 1995), pp. 112–27.Google Scholar
Delaney, C., The Seed and the Soil: Gender and Cosmology in Turkish Village Society (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Duben, A., “The significance of family and kinship in urban Turkey,” in Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (ed.), Sex Roles, Family and Community in Turkey (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1982), pp. 73–99.Google Scholar
Fawcett, J. T., “Perceptions of the value of children,” in Bulatao, R., Lee, R. D., Hollerbach, P. E., and Bongaarts, J. (eds.), Determinants of Fertility in the Developing Countries (Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1983), pp. 347–69.Google Scholar
Fişek, G. O., “Gender hierarchy: Is it a useful concept in describing family structure?,” in Lawick, J. and Sanders, M. (eds.), Family, Gender and Beyond (Heemstede, The Netherlands: LS Books, 1995), pp. 63–72.Google Scholar
Georgas, J., Berry, J. W., and Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç., “Synthesis: How similar and how different are families across cultures?,” in Georgas, J., Berry, J. W., Vijver, F. J. R., Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç., and Poortinga, Y. H. (eds.), Families across Cultures: A 30-nation Psychological Study (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006a), pp. 186–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgas, J., Berry, J. W., Vijver, F. J. R., Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç., and Poortinga, Y. H. (eds.), Families across Cultures: A 30-nation Psychological Study (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006b).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgas, J., Mylonas, K., Bafiti, T., Poortinga, Y. H., Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç., Orung, S. et al., “Functional relationships in the nuclear and extended family: A 16-culture study,”International Journal of Psychology, 36 (2001), 289–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgas, J., Vijver, F. J. R., Berry, J. W., Poortinga, Y. H., and Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç., “Methodology of the study,” in Georgas, J., Berry, J. W., Vijver, F. J. R., Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç., and Poortinga, Y. H. (eds.), Families across Cultures: A 30-nation Psychological Study (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006c), pp. 111–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, L. W., “The value of children to parents and childrearing parents,” in Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (ed.), Growth and Progress in Cross-cultural Psychology (Lisse, The Netherlands: Swetz & Zeitlinger, 1987), pp. 159–70.Google Scholar
Hoffman, L. W., “Cross-cultural differences in child-rearing goals,”New Directions for Child Development, 40 (1988), 99–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hortaçsu, N., “Targets of communication during adolescence,”Journal of Adolescence, 12 (1989), 253–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hortaçsu, N., “Prelude to marriage in Ankara: Educational level, reasons for marriage, feelings for spouse and families,”Boğaziçi Journal, 9 (1995), 185–205.Google Scholar
Hortaçsu, N., Gençöz, T., and Oral, A., “Perceived functions of family and friends during childhood, adolescence, and youth: Developmental theories of two Turkish groups,”International Journal of Psychology, 30 (1995), 591–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
İmamoğlu, O., “An interdependence model of human development,” in Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (ed.), Growth and Progress in Cross-cultural Psychology (Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger, 1987), pp. 138–45.Google Scholar
İmamoğlu, O. and Karakitapoğlu-Aygün, Z., “1970lerden 1990lara değerler: Üniversite düzeyinde gözlenen zaman, kuşak ve cinsiyet farklılıkları [Value preferences from the 1970s to 1990s: Cohort, generation and gender differences at a Turkish university],”Turkish Journal of Psychology, 14 (1999), 1–22.Google Scholar
İmamoğlu, O. and Karakitapoğlu-Aygün, Z., “Self-construals and values in different cultural and socioeconomic contexts,”Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 130 (2004), 277–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç., The Changing Value of Children in Turkey (Publ. No. 60-E) (Honolulu: East-West Center, 1982).Google Scholar
Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç., “Culture of separateness-culture of relatedness,” in Klopp, C. (ed.), 1984 Vision and Reality. Papers in Comparative Studies. Volume 4 (Columbus: Ohio State University, 1985), pp. 91–99.Google Scholar
Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç., “Family and socialization in cross-cultural perspective: A model of change,” in Berman, J. (ed.), Cross-cultural Perspectives: Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1989 (Lincoln: Nebraska University Press, 1990), pp. 135–200.Google Scholar
Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç., Family and Human Development across Cultures: A View from the Other Side. (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1996).Google Scholar
Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç., Family, Self, and Human Development across Cultures: Theory and Applications, Second edition (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2007).Google Scholar
Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. and Ataca, B., “Value of children and family change: A three-decade portrait from Turkey,”Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54 (2005), 317–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kandiyoti, D., “Some social psychological dimensions of social change in a Turkish village,”British Journal of Sociology, 15 (1974), 47–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, U., Y.-S. Park, Y.-E. Kwon, and Koo, J., “Values of children, parent–child relationship, and social change in Korea: Indigenous, cultural, and psychological analysis,”Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54 (2005), 338–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klaus, D., Nauck, B., and Klein, T., “Families and the value of children in Germany,” in Trommsdorff, G. and Nauck, B. (eds.), The Value of Children in Cross-cultural Perspective: Case Studies from Eight Societies (Berlin: Pabst Science, 2005), pp. 17–41.Google Scholar
Koç, I., “Timing of leaving home in Turkey and its relationship with other life course events,”The Turkish Journal of Population Studies, 23 (2002), 16–24.Google Scholar
Mishra, R., Mayer, B., Trommsdorff, G., Albert, I., and Schwarz, B., “Background and empirical results,” in Trommsdorff, G. and Nauck, B. (eds.), The Value of Children in Cross-cultural Perspective: Case Studies from Eight Societies (Berlin: Pabst Science, 2005), pp. 143–70.Google Scholar
Starr, J., “The role of Turkish secular law in changing the lives of rural Muslim women, 1950–1970,”Law and Society Review, 23 (1989), 497–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunar, D., “Changes in Turkish child rearing practices,” paper presented at the workshop on Individualism and Collectivism, Seoul, Korea, July 13–16, 1990.
Sunar, D., “Change and continuity in the Turkish middle class family,” in Özdalga, E. and Liljestrom, R. (eds.), Autonomy and Dependence in Family: Turkey and Sweden in Critical Perspective (Istanbul: Swedish Research Institute, 2002), pp. 217–37.Google Scholar
Sunar, D. and Fişek, G., “Contemporary Turkish families,” in Roopnarine, J. L. and Gielen, U. (eds.), Families in Global Perspective (Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon, 2005), pp. 169–83.Google Scholar
Timur, S., Family Structure in Turkey (Ankara: Hacettepe University Press, 1972).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×