Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-07T00:48:49.041Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - The Role of Repeated Retrieval in Shaping Collective Memory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

By
Henry L. Roediger ,
Franklin M. Zaromb  and
Andrew C. Butler
Edited by
Pascal Boyer  and
James V. Wertsch
Pascal Boyer
Affiliation:
Washington University, St. Louis
James V. Wertsch
Affiliation:
Washington University, St Louis
Get access

Summary

This book is about culture and memory, about how the society and culture in which people grow up helps to determine their individual memories, collective memories, and identity. We will emphasize how the process of repeated retrieval helps to shape our memories. Before we get to our main story, we need to provide some background.

Many different cultures exist within the community of scholars who study memory, from humanistic approaches to a whole variety of scientific approaches to the field (see Roediger, Dudai & Fitzpatrick, 2007). In our chapter, we attempt to blend some insights from several approaches to studying memory. In particular, we apply the principles that have emerged from research in experimental cognitive psychology to issues in collective memory in hopes that combining insights from various disciplines may point the way to progress in understanding larger issues in the study of memory.

Our chapter has six parts. First, we discuss issues in collective memory – how we conceive the topic – by considering three conceptual oppositions (following Wertsch & Roediger, 2008). We then discuss how these issues might play out in learning about history from textbooks. Next, we describe three main mechanisms that we believe play a critical role in shaping collective memory: the act of retrieving information from memory; repeated retrieval of information over long periods of time; and finally the role of feedback in modifying memories.

Type
Chapter
Information
Memory in Mind and Culture , pp. 138 - 170
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andre, T., & Thieman, A. (1988). Level of adjunct question, type of feedback, and learning concepts by reading. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 13, 296–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balota, D. A., Duchek, J. M., & Logan, J. M. (2007). Is expanded retrieval practice a superior form of spaced retrieval? A critical review of the extant literature. In Nairne, J. S. (Ed.), The foundations of remembering: Essays in honor of Henry L. Roediger, III (pp. 83–105). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. C. (1991). Effects of frequent classroom testing. Journal of Educational Research, 85, 89–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C. C., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M. (1991). The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research, 61, 213–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, A. E., Nelson, T. O., Dunlosky, J., Mazzoni, G., & Narens, L. (1999). An integrative system of metamemory components involved in retrieval. In Gopher, D. & Koriat, A. (Eds.), Attention and Performance XVII – Cognitive regulation of performance: Interaction of theory and application (pp. 287–313). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Basden, B. H., Basden, D. R., & Henry, S. (2000). Costs and benefits of collaborative remembering. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 497–507.3.0.CO;2-4>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berntsen, D., & Thomsen, D. K. (2005). Personal memories for remote historical events: Accuracy and clarity of flashbulb memories related to World War II. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 242–257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bjork, R. A. (1975). Retrieval as a memory modifier: An interpretation of negative recency and related phenomena. In Solso, R. L. (Ed.), Information processing and cognition (pp. 123–144). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Brokaw, T. (2001). The greatest generation. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Brown, R., & Kulik, J. (1977). Flashbulb memories. Cognition, 5, 73–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, A. C., Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L. (2008). Correcting a meta-cognitive error: Feedback enhances retention of low confidence correct responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 34, 918–928.Google Scholar
Butler, A. C., Marsh, E. J., Goode, M. K., & Roediger, H. L. (2006). When additional multiple-choice lures aid versus hinder later memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 941–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, A. C., & Roediger, H. L. (2007). Testing improves long-term retention in a simulated classroom setting. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19, 514–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, A. C., & Roediger, H. L. (2008). Feedback enhances the positive effects and reduces the negative effects of multiple-choice testing. Memory & Cognition, 36, 604–616,CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (2005). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65, 245–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butterfield, B., & Metcalfe, J. (2001). Errors committed with high confidence are hypercorrected. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1491–1494.Google ScholarPubMed
Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (2006). The correction of errors committed with high confidence. Metacognition & Learning, 1, 69–84.Google Scholar
Carrier, M., & Pashler, H. (1992). The influence of retrieval on retention. Memory & Cognition, 20, 633–642.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 354–380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chan, C. K., McDermott, K. B., & Roediger, H. L. (2006). Retrieval induced facilitation: Initially nontested material can benefit from prior testing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 533–571.Google ScholarPubMed
Conway, M. A. (1995). Flashbulb memories. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
Cull, W. L. (2000). Untangling the benefits of multiple study opportunities and repeated testing for cued recall. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 215–235.3.0.CO;2-1>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cull, W. L., Shaughnessy, J. J., & Zechmeister, E. B. (1996). Expanding understanding of the expanding-pattern-of-retrieval mnemonic: Toward confidence in applicability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2, 365–378.Google Scholar
Curci, A., & Luminet, O. (2006). Follow-up of a cross-national comparison on flashbulb and event memory for the September 11th attacks. Memory, 14, 329–344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dempster, F. N. (1989). Spacing effects and their implications for theory and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 1, 309–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dudai, Y. (2002). Memory from A to Z: Keywords, concepts and beyond. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ebbinghaus, H. (1967). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology (Ruger, H. A. & Bussenius, C. E., Trans.). New York: Dover. (Original work published 1885).Google Scholar
Er, N. (2003). A new flashbulb memory model applied to the Marmara earthquake. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 503–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fazio, L. K., Huelser, B. J., Johnson, A. & Marsh, E. J. (under review). Receiving partial feedback: Consequences for learning.
Foos, P. W., & Fisher, R. P. (1988). Using tests as learning opportunities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 179–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gates, A. I. (1917). Recitation as a factor in memorizing. Archives of Psychology, 6(40), 1–104.Google Scholar
Gilman, D. A. (1969). Comparison of several feedback methods for correcting errors by computer-assisted instructionJournal of Educational Psychology, 60, 503–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glenberg, A. M. (1976). Monotonic and nonmonotonic lag effects in paired-associate and recognition memory paradigms. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glover, J. A. (1989). The “testing” phenomenon: Not gone but nearly forgotten. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 392–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halbwachs, M. (1980). The collective memory. New York: Harper & Row. (Trans. by Didder, Francis J. and Ditter, Vida Yazdi).Google Scholar
Halbwachs, M. (1992). On collective memory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Ed. and Trans. by Coser, Lewis A.).Google Scholar
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huelser, B. J., & Marsh, E. J. (2006, November). Does guessing on a multiple-choice test affect later cued recall? Poster presented at the Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Houston, TX.
Jones, H. E. (1923–1924). The effects of examination n the performance of learning. Archives of Psychology, 10, 1–70.Google Scholar
Kang, S. H. K., McDermott, K. B., & Roediger, H. L. (2007). Test format and corrective feedback modulate the effect of testing on memory retention. The European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19, 528–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L. (2007a). Expanding retrieval practice promotes short-term retention, but equally spaced retrieval enhances long-term retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 33, 704–719.Google ScholarPubMed
Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L. (2007b). Repeated retrieval during learning is the key to long-term retention. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 151–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, C. M., & Sahakyan, L. (2003). Memory, monitoring and control in the attainment of memory accuracy. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 704–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koriat, A., & Goldsmith, M. (1996). Monitoring and control processes in strategic regulation of memory accuracy. Psychological Review, 103, 490–517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kramer, J. (1996). The politics of memory: Looking for Germany in the New Germany. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Kulhavy, R. W. (1977). Feedback in written instruction. Review of Educational Research, 47, 211–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulhavy, R. W., & Stock, W. A. (1989). Feedback in written instruction: The place of response certitude. Educational Psychology Review, 1, 279–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulhavy, R. W., White, M. T., Topp, B. W., Chan, A. L., & Adams, J. (1985). Feedback complexity and corrective efficiency. Contemporary Educational Pscyhology, 10, 285–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landauer, T. K., & Bjork, R. A. (1978). Optimum rehearsal patterns and name learning. In Gruneberg, M. M., Morris, P. E., & Sykes, R. N. (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory (pp. 625–632). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lewandowsky, S., Stritzke, W., Oberauer, K., & Morales, M. (2005). Memory for fact, fiction, and misinformation: The Iraq War 2003. Psychological Science, 16, 190–195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lhyle, K. G., & Kulhavy, R. W. (1987). Feedback processing and error correction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 320–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindaman, D., & Ward, K. (2004). History lessons: How textbooks from around the world portray U.S. history. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Liu, J. H., Goldstein-Hawes, R., Hilton, D., Huang, L-L., Gastardo-Conaco, C., Dresler-Hawke, E., et al. (2005). Social representations of events and people in world history across 12 cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Logan, J. M., & Balota, D. A. (2008). Expanded versus. equal interval spaced retrieval practice: Exploring different schedules of spacing and retention interval in younger and older adults. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 15, 257–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loewen, J. (1995). Lies my teacher told me: Everything your American history textbook got wrong. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
Luminet, O., Curci, A., Marsh, E. J., Wessel, I., Constantin, T., Gencoz, F., & Yogo, M. (2004). The cognitive, emotional, and social impacts of the September 11 attacks: Group difference in memory for the reception context and the determinants of flashbulb memory. The Journal of General Psychology, 131, 197–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDaniel, M. A., Anderson, J. L., Derbish, M. H., & Morrisette, N. (2007). Testing the testing effect in the classroom. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 19, 494–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDaniel, M. A., & Fisher, R. P. (1991). Tests and test feedback as learning sources. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 16, 192–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDaniel, M. A., Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (2007). Generalizing test-enhanced learning from the laboratory to the classroom. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 200–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, K. B. (2006). Paradoxical effects of testing: Repeated retrieval attempts enhance the likelihood of later accurate and false recall. Memory & Cognition, 34, 261–267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Melton, A. W. (1970). The situation with respect to the spacing of repetitions and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 596–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neisser, U., & Harsch, N. (1992). Phantom flashbulbs: False recollections of hearing the news about Challenger. In Winograd, E. & Neisser, U. (Eds.), Affect and accuracy in recall: Studies of flashbulb memories (pp. 9–31). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Neisser, U., Winograd, E., Bergman, E. T., Schreiber, C. A., Palmer, S. E., & Weldon, M. S. (1996). Remembering the earthquake: Direct experience vs. hearing the news. Memory, 4, 337–357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In Bower, G. H. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 26, pp. 125–141). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Novick, P. (1999). The Holocaust in American life. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
Pashler, H., Cepeda, N. J., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2005). When does feedback facilitate learning of words?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 3–8.Google Scholar
Peeck, J. (1979). Effects of differential feedback on the answering of two types of questions by fifth- and sixth-graders. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 49, 87–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phye, G. D. (1979). The processing of informative feedback about multiple-choice test performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 4, 381–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajaram, S., & Pereira-Pasarin, L. (2007). Collaboration can improve individual recognition memory: Evidence from immediate and delayed tests. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 95–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roediger, H. L. (1985). Remembering Ebbinghaus. Contemporary Psychology, 30, 519–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roediger, H. L., Bergman, E. T., & Meade, M. L. (2000). Repeated reproduction from memory. In Saito, A. (Ed.), Bartlett, culture, and cognition. Cambridge, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Roediger, H. L., Dudai, Y., & Fitzpatrick, S. M. (Eds.). (2007). Science of memory: Concepts. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Roediger, H. L., Jacoby, D., & McDermott, K. B. (1996). Misinformation effects in recall: Creating false memories through repeated retrieval. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 300–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006a). The power of testing memory: Basic research and implications for educational practice. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 181–210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006b). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17, 249–255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roediger, H. L., & Marsh, E. J. (2005). The positive and negative consequences of multiple-choice testing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 1155–1159.Google ScholarPubMed
Roediger, H. L., Meade, M. L., & Bergman, E. T. (2001). Social contagion of memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 365–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roper, W. J. (1977). Feedback in computer assisted instruction. Programmed Learning and Educational Technology, 14, 43–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, D. C., & Kozin, M. (1984). Vivid memories. Cognition, 16, 81–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schudson, M. (1992). Watergate in American memory: How we remember, forget, and reconstruct the past. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Shapiro, (2006). Remembering September 11th: The role of retention interval and rehearsal on flashbulb and event memory. Memory, 14, 129–147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skurnik, I., Yoon, C., Park, D. C., & Schwarz, N. (2005). How warnings about false claims become recommendations. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 713–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spitzer, H. F. (1939). Studies in retention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 30, 641–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory. In Tulving, E. & Donaldson, W. (Eds.), Organization and memory (pp. 381–403). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ward, K. (2006). History in the making: An absorbing look at how American history has changed in the telling over the last 200 years. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Wegner, D. M. (1986). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In Mullen, B. & Goethals, G. R. (Eds.), Theories of Group Behavior (pp. 185–205). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Weldon, M. S., & Bellinger, K. D. (1997). Collective memory: Collaborative and individual processes in remembering. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1160–1175.Google ScholarPubMed
Wertsch, J. W. (2002). Voices of collective remembering. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wertsch, J. W. (2008). Collective memory. In Byrne, J. H. (Ed.), Learning and Memory: A Comprehensive Reference. (pp. 927–939). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Ltd.Google Scholar
Wertsch, J. V., & Roediger, H. L. (2008). Collective memory: Conceptual foundations and theoretical approaches. Memory, 16, 318–326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wheeler, M. A., & Roediger, H. L.. (1992). Disparate effects of repeated testing: Reconciling Ballard's (1913) and Bartlett's (1932) results. Psychological Science, 3, 240–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaragoza, M. S., & Mitchell, K. J. (1996). Repeated exposure to suggestion and the creation of false memories. Psychological Science, 7, 294–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×