The Levels of Self-Criticism Scale: comparative self-criticism and internalized self-criticism
Section snippets
The Levels of Self-Criticism Scale
A variety of theorists have noted two basic outcomes of personality development: the development of the capacity for healthy, constructive relationships and the development of a sense of autonomy together with a positive personal identity (e.g. Bakan, 1966, Erikson, 1950, Freud, 1961). Recent theoretical work has highlighted the ongoing dialectic between agency, the drive toward individuation and self-definition, and communion, the drive toward engaging in constructive relationships with others
Participants
Two-hundred and eighty-two undergraduate students participated in the scale development phase of the study. Of the 282 students, 144 were female, and 138 were male. Questionnaire packets were distributed in several undergraduate classes. Participants completed the questionnaire packets at home, and returned them to the researchers.
LOSC
Participants completed a 34-item version of the LOSC, which had been developed rationally. Each item was intended to reflect one of the levels of self-criticism
Study 2: validation of the LOSC
Study 2 was conducted to examine convergent, discriminant and construct validity. Convergent validity was examined by assessing the relation of CSC and ISC with the theoretically related constructs of self-criticism, self-esteem, psychological distress, and perfectionism. Discriminant validity was examined by assessing differences in the relation of CSC and ISC with the Big Five personality constructs. Construct validity was examined by assessing the relation of CSC and ISC with attachment
General discussion
In Study 1, the LOSC was derived from a set of rationally generated items designed to assess two forms of Self-Criticism, differing in developmental level of maturity. It was subjected to factor analysis and, as expected, two subscales, CSC and ISC were found. This factor solution was replicated in Study 2, increasing confidence in the performance and stability of these scales.
There is reasonably good evidence for the convergent and discriminant validity of the LOSC. Both the CSC and ISC
Acknowledgements
We thank Sylvette LaTouche, Tracy Robinson, and Kerry Shaz for their help in collecting this data. We also thank David Dunkley, Isabel Igreja, and Sidney Blatt for their thoughtful comments on earlier versions of the article and on the items comprising the LOSC scale.
References (32)
- et al.
A comparison of two measures of perfectionism
Personality and Individual Differences
(1993) - et al.
Depressive personality stylesimplications for adult attachment
Personality and Individual Differences
(1995) Fundamentals of psychoanalysis
(1948)- et al.
The psychological organization of depression
American Journal of Psychiatry
(1980) The duality of human existence: an essay on psychology and religion
(1966)- et al.
Attachment styles among young adultsa test of a four-category model
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
(1991) Cognitive therapy of depression: new perspectives
Levels of object representation in anaclitic and introjective depression
Psychoanalytic Study of the Child
(1974)- et al.
Relatedness and self-definition: two primary dimensions in personality development, psychopathology, and psychotherapy
- et al.
Experiences of depression in normal young adults
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
(1976)