Research reportFamily caregiving in depression: impact on caregivers' daily life, distress, and help seeking
Introduction
Living with a person suffering from a severe mental illness often causes considerable personal, social, and economic burden on individuals and communities, sometimes detriment to caregivers' own health Schene, 1986, Hatfield and Lefley, 1987, Fadden et al., 1987b, Schene et al., 1994, Schene et al., 1996. However, in the past, caregivers often lacked support from the psychiatric teams in coping with the patient's symptoms and behavior, and on the whole, the emotional experience of caregiving had no priority in therapy Fadden et al., 1987b, Muscroft and Bowl, 2000. In recent years, there has been a growing concern for the consequences experienced by patient's caregivers, and in several countries, deinstionalization of psychiatric care led to the founding of organizations for families of patients with serious mental illness (Schene and van Wijngaarden, 1995).
Despite the fact that 15 years ago, Fadden et al. (1987a) already stated that families of other patient groups were also seriously affected by the patient's illness, studies are mainly restricted to schizophrenia or other psychotic disorders. The reason why the caregiving consequences of affective disorders did not attract much attention presumably lies in the episodic nature of these disorders and the erroneous notion that unlike schizophrenia, affective disorders do not entail chronicity or adverse effect on the functioning of the patient (Chakrabarti et al., 1992). The scant information about the consequences of affective disorders exclusively deals with the effects on spouses, probably because depressive patients are much more likely to be married. Marital and sexual relationships often are badly affected, and spouses take over various roles normally done by patient, causing restrictions in their own social activities and high levels of subjective burden Fadden et al., 1987a, Fadden et al., 1987b, Jacob et al., 1987. The few studies on the caregiving consequences of affective disorders suggest that also the relatives of these patients experience considerable distress, sometimes strikingly parallel to that in schizophrenia Targum et al., 1981, Fadden et al., 1987a, Fadden et al., 1987b, Chakrabarti et al., 1992. Schizophrenia research showed that the level of caregiving consequences can be predicted from a number of interrelated variables: patient–caregiver relationship characteristics like the amount of time spent together, patient characteristics like symptoms and disabilities, and caregiver characteristics like coping and social support Schene and van Wijngaarden, 1993, Schene, 1990, Schene et al., 1998, Magliano et al., 1998, Magliano et al., 2000. Similar results were found in studies on the caregiving consequences of affective or bipolar disorders. Those living with patients experienced most consequences that were higher if the caregiver was female, if the patient was in an acute phase, had more symptoms and a long psychiatric history, and if caregivers felt that they had no control over patient's illness Chakrabarti et al., 1992, Fadden et al., 1987b, Jacob et al., 1987, Perlick et al., 1999.
Also, the effects on the (mental) health of caregivers of patients with affective disorders were comparable to findings in schizophrenia research Fadden et al., 1987a, Schene et al., 1998. Between 31% (Dyck et al., 1999) and 40% (Struening et al., 1995) of caregivers have above threshold scores for clinically significant depression on self-report measures like the CES-D (Perlick et al., 2001), with higher scores in case of more burden Struening et al., 1995, Barrowclough and Parle, 1997, Dyck et al., 1999.
Although these studies suggest that caregiving consequences of affective disorders can be serious, all had one or more methodological drawbacks. Most did not include comparison groups, instruments generally were not validated, or/and were not designed to measure burden. In addition, these studies mainly focused on bipolar or schizo-affective disorders instead of depression. Given these methodological shortcomings, there was a need for a study on caregiving consequences in ‘true’ depressive disorders, using a validated and applicable instrument. This study was designed to answer the following questions:
- 1.
What are the consequences for caregivers of sharing daily life with depressed patients?
- 2.
Are these consequences related to diagnosis (major depression vs. dysthymia), illness phase, duration and severity of the illness, and patient or caregivers' (socio-) demographic characteristics?
- 3.
Are these consequences related to caregivers' feelings of distress, and to which extent do they lead to use of (mental) health care?
Section snippets
Inclusion criteria and patient samples
The study was conducted amongst relatives, friends, partners, or other caregivers of patients fulfilling the clinical DSM-IV criteria of
- –
major depressive disorder, single episode, or recurrent (296.2×, 296.3×),
- –
dysthymic disorder (300.40),
- –
other depressive disorders (309.00, 311.00).
Patients were recruited at the inpatient and outpatient department of an Academic Medical Center and the outpatient departments of two mental hospitals. All departments were specialized in the treatment of depression.
Socio-demographic characteristics
Table 1 contains the socio-demographic characteristics of patients and caregivers. Of the 260 patients, two-third had a clinical diagnosis of major depression, and one-fifth had dysthymia.
The nonacute outpatient sample scored somewhat lower on the Zung SDS sumscore (one-way ANOVA, F=7.2, df=2, p=0.001), and the inpatient sample patients had a shorter psychiatric history (χ2=13.8, df=6, p=0.032).
In total, 61.2% of the patients were female, the average age was 45.4 years (S.D.=13.9). The
Conclusion and discussion
This is the first large sample study that describes the consequences of depression for caregivers of patients, assessed with a validated instrument. The Involvement Evaluation Questionnaire (IEQ), originally developed for schizophrenia research and later adapted for use in depression research, has proven to be a valid, reliable, sensitive to change, and cultural sensitive instrument, suitable for assessing caregiving consequences van Wijngaarden et al., 1996, van Wijngaarden et al., 2000, van
References (37)
- et al.
Ways of Coping Checklist: a process measure
- et al.
Appraisal, psychological adjustment and expressed emotion in relatives of patients suffering from schizophrenia
British Journal of Psychiatry
(1997) - et al.
The EPSILON study of schizophrenia in five European countries: design and methodology for standardising outcome measures and comparing patterns of care and service costs
British Journal of Psychiatry
(1999) - et al.
Reliable outcome measures for mental health service research in five European countries: the EPSILON Study. Aims, outcome measures, study sites and patient sample
British Journal of Psychiatry
(2000) - et al.
Family burden of caring for people with mental illness
British Journal of Psychiatry
(1999) - et al.
Extent and determinants of burden among families of patients with affective disorders
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
(1992) - et al.
Inventarisatielijst Sociale Betrokkenheid: ISB
(1986) - et al.
Predictors of burden and infectious illness in schizophrenia caregivers
Psychosomatic Medicine
(1999) - et al.
The impact of functional psychiatric illness on the patient's family
British Journal of Psychiatry
(1987) - et al.
Caring and its burdens: a study of the spouses of depressed patients
British Journal of Psychiatry
(1987)
An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community sample
Journal of Health and Social Behavior
Families of the Mentally Ill: Coping and Adaptation
Recurrent depression: an assessment of family burden and family attitudes
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Burden on the families of patients with schizophrenia: results of the BIOMED I study
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
Family burden and coping strategies in schizophrenia: 1-year follow-up data from the BIOMED 1 study
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
Family burden of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: perceptions of relatives and professionals
Psychiatric Services
The impact of depression on caregivers and other family members: implications for professional support
Counselling Psychology Quarterly
Burden experienced by care-givers of persons with bipolar affective disorder
British Journal of Psychiatry
Cited by (128)
The impact of treatment-resistant depression on the lives of carers: A mixed-methods study
2023, Journal of Affective DisordersMaternal depression and adolescent optimism
2022, SSM - Population HealthBarriers to students opting-in to universities notifying emergency contacts when serious mental health concerns emerge: A UK mixed methods analysis of policy preferences
2022, Journal of Affective Disorders ReportsMultidimensional and intergenerational impact of Severe Mental Disorders
2021, eClinicalMedicineFamily members' perceptions and experiences of older people displaying major depression
2020, Archives of Psychiatric NursingCitation Excerpt :Participants were distressed upset by either the clinical depression of their parents or physical illness themselves, which is consistent with a prior study showing that caregivers worried about the patient's general health, treatment, safety, and future. There were relational strains, distressed and had to visit a health care especially when the patient was in an acute phase (van Wijngaarden, Schene, & Koeter, 2004). It should be a task for mental healthcare provider to provide what specific support the family member needs and to provide information for where they can visit when they need help.