Original Article
Exploring the validity of the chalder fatigue scale in chronic fatigue syndrome

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3999(98)00022-1Get rights and content

Abstract

The Chalder fatigue scale is widely used to measure physical and mental fatigue in chronic fatigue syndrome patients, but the constructs of the scale have not been examined in this patient sample. We examined the constructs of the 14-item fatigue scale in a sample of 136 chronic fatigue syndrome patients through principal components analysis, followed by correlations with measures of subjective and objective cognitive performance, physiological measures of strength and functional work capacity, depression, anxiety, and subjective sleep difficulties. There were four factors of fatigue explaining 67% of the total variance. Factor 1 was correlated with subjective everyday cognitive difficulties, concentration difficulties, and a deficit in paired associate learning. Factor 2 was correlated with difficulties in maintaining sleep. Factor 3 was inversely correlated with grip strength, peak VO2, peak heart rate, and peak functional work capacity. Factor 4 was correlated with interview and self-rated measures of depression. The results support the validity of mental and physical fatigue subscales and the dropping of the “loss of interest” item in the 11-item version of the fatigue scale.

Introduction

Chalder et al. [1] developed a brief self-rated 14-item instrument that measures the symptoms of mental and physical fatigue that are thought to be pathognomonic to chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) 2, 3. The Chalder fatigue scale has been used recently in treatment outcome studies in CFS patients 4, 5. The validity and reliability of their scale has been examined in general practice attenders [1], but not before in CFS patients. However, inspection of the scale raises some questions concerning the validity of some items and its subdivision into physical (eight items) and mental fatigue subscales (six items). For instance, the mental fatigue item “loss of interest” is a cardinal symptom of depression [6]. The item “feeling sleepy or drowsy” could be related to problems with maintaining sleep at night [7] rather than physical fatigue items related to loss of stamina or strength, or mental fatigue symptoms such as poor concentration and word-finding difficulties. The physical fatigue subscale item “problems starting things” could be due to loss of motivation or an inability to organize oneself instead of a physical problem. We examined the validity of the constructs of physical and mental fatigue of the 14-item Chalder fatigue scale against a variety of subjective and objective measures of physical and mental functioning and mood and sleep disturbance.

Section snippets

Subjects

Patients with CFS over the age of 18 years were recruited from consecutive referrals to a university department of medicine out-patient clinic from consultant physicians and general practitioners across northwestern England and northern Wales. All patients were medically assessed by a doctor under the direct supervision of a consultant physician. A full history, physical examination, and laboratory investigations (full blood count, ESR, biochemistry, creatinine phosphokinase, c-reactive

Results

Two hundred twenty-seven patients were assessed for eligibility into a treatment trial of graduated aerobic exercise and fluoxetine, which will be separately reported. Sixty-two did not fulfill criteria for CFS. Of the remaining 165, 25 did not consent to the treatment trial, 3 could not come off antidepressants, and 1 required other medical treatment first. The 136 CFS patients not taking psychotropic medication who started the treatment trial completed the assessments examined in the current

Discussion

In contrast to the two constructs of fatigue obtained by Chalder et al. [1] in a general practice sample with the 14-item fatigue scale, we extracted four constructs of fatigue in CFS patients. The results support the validity of the less widely used 11-item version of the Chalder fatigue scale [1], which drops the “loss of interest” item—which was strongly correlated with interview and self-rated depression, but not any other measure of mental or physical functioning. The 11-item fatigue scale

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgments—This study was supported by a grant from the Linbury Trust. We would like to thank Drs. David Pearson, Ian Campbell, Paul Strickland, Trudie Roberts, and Professor Louis Appleby for assessments or use of their equipment, and Brian Faragher for statistical advice.

References (18)

  • T Chalder et al.

    Development of a fatigue scale

    J Psychosom Res

    (1993)
  • R Morriss et al.

    The relationship of sleep difficulties to fatigue, mood and disability in chronic fatigue syndrome

    J Psychosom Res

    (1997)
  • M.C Sharpe et al.

    A report—chronic fatigue syndromeguidelines for research

    J R Soc Med

    (1991)
  • K Fukuda et al.

    The chronic fatigue syndromea comprehensive approach to definition and study. (International Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Group)

    Ann Intern Med

    (1994)
  • A Deale et al.

    Cognitive behaviour therapy for chronic fatigue syndromea randomised controlled trial

    Am J Psychiatry

    (1997)
  • K.Y Fulcher et al.

    Randomised controlled trial of grade exercise in patients with the chronic fatigue syndrome

    BMJ

    (1997)
  • American Psychiatric Association

    Diagnostic and statistical manual

    (1987)
  • R.K Morriss et al.

    Abnormalities of sleep in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome

    BMJ

    (1993)
  • A.S Zigmond et al.

    The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD)

    Acta Psychiatrica Scand

    (1983)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (134)

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text