Elsevier

Preventive Medicine

Volume 56, Issues 3–4, March–April 2013, Pages 190-196
Preventive Medicine

PROSPER community–university partnership delivery system effects on substance misuse through 6 1/2 years past baseline from a cluster randomized controlled intervention trial

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.12.013Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

To examine the effects of a delivery system for evidence-based preventive interventions through 12th grade, 6.5 years past baseline.

Method

A cohort sequential design included 28 public school districts randomly assigned to the partnership delivery system or usual-programming conditions. At baseline, 11,960 students participated. Partnerships supported community teams that implemented a family-focused intervention in 6th grade and a school-based intervention in 7th grade. Outcome measures included lifetime, current misuse, and frequencies of misuse, for a range of substances. Intent-to-treat, multilevel analyses of covariance of point-in-time misuse and analyses of growth in misuse were conducted.

Results

Results showed significantly lower substance misuse in the intervention group at one or both time points for most outcomes, with relative reduction rates of up to 31.4%. There was significantly slower growth in misuse in the intervention group for 8 of the 10 outcomes. In addition, risk moderation results indicated that there were significantly greater intervention benefits for higher- versus lower-risk youth, for the misuse of 6 of the 10 substances at 11th grade, illicit substances at 12th grade, and growth in the misuse of illicit substances.

Conclusion

Partnership-based delivery systems for brief universal interventions have potential for public health impact by reducing substance misuse among youth, particularly higher-risk youth.

Highlights

► We examine long-term effects of PROSPER, an evidence-based prevention system. ► We measure lifetime, current, and frequency of misuse for a range of substances. ► PROSPER reduced substance misuse; rates were up to 31.4% lower than the control. ► There were greater intervention benefits for higher- versus lower-risk youth. ► Partnership-based delivery systems have potential for public health impact.

Introduction

Prevalence rates of alcohol, tobacco, marijuana, and other illicit substances among adolescents continue to be high (Johnston et al., 2012) and result in adverse health effects. The long-term negative consequences of underage drinking and substance misuse are well documented (Harwood, 2000, Harwood and Bouchery, 2001, Mathurin and Deltenre, 2009, McCambridge et al., 2011, Miller and Hendrie, 2008). Early substance misuse is associated with reduced levels of educational and occupational attainment, risky sexual practices, and impaired mental health (National Institute on Drug Abuse, 2009).

Recent recommendations for addressing substance misuse through universal intervention include implementation through community-based partnerships linking scientists with community practitioners (Grumbach and Mold, 2009, Hawkins et al., 2012, National Research Council and Institute of Medicine, 2009, Spoth and Greenberg, 2005). However, community health-related systems often are ill-equipped to develop and sustain the necessary partnerships and interventions (Berwick, 2003, Gold and Bailey, 2008, Grumbach and Mold, 2009, Woolf, 2008). The current study evaluates a diffusion model that addresses these problems, in order to better translate health science into practice (Berwick, 2003, Woolf, 2008). This model, called PROSPER (PROmoting School–community–university Partnerships to Enhance Resilience), was designed as a partnership-based delivery system for scientifically-proven prevention programs or evidence-based interventions (EBIs).

The PROSPER model leverages the existing infrastructure of land grant universities' Cooperative Extension Systems (CES), which serve scientific outreach functions in every state. The three tiers of the PROSPER model consist of: (1) teams of community stakeholders linked with public schools and led by local CES staff, (2) Prevention Coordinators (PCs) connected with the land grant university's CES, and (3) a team of state-level university researchers and CES faculty. Prevention Coordinators serve as liaisons between the community and university teams, providing ongoing, proactive technical assistance to community teams to optimize team functioning and program delivery.

Effectiveness of the PROSPER model's key elements (Spoth et al., 2004, Spoth et al., 2007a) has been demonstrated through a longitudinal cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT), begun in 2001. These findings include effective participant recruitment (Spoth et al., 2007b), maintenance of implementation quality (Spoth et al., 2007c), and sustainability of intervention delivery (Greenberg et al., unpublished results). Additional results include positive effects on intervention-targeted youth and parent skills, putative mediators likely to reduce substance misuse (Redmond et al., 2009), as well as significant reductions in substance misuse at 4.5 years (10th grade) among intervention group students (Spoth et al., 2011). The current study examines longer-term effects of this partnership-based prevention program delivery model.

In addition to evaluating intervention effects on substance misuse at the end of high school (11th and 12th grades, 5.5 and 6.5 years past baseline), we also evaluate intervention effects on growth in adolescent substance misuse across 6.5 years, and risk-related moderation of these effects.

Section snippets

Community selection and assignment

Twenty eight communities participated; 14 in both Iowa and Pennsylvania. The sample size recruited was based on multilevel power calculations incorporating effect sizes and ICCs estimated from previous evaluation trials of programs on the PROSPER menu. Pairs of communities were matched (14 blocks) on school district size and geographic location, and then randomly assigned to either the partnership intervention or the “usual programming” comparison condition. Because the intervention condition

Sample quality

Pretest equivalence of the two conditions was assessed; there were no significant differences on any sociodemographic measure (e.g., gender, age, race, school lunch status) or on any of the 10 outcomes. Differential attrition was assessed by examining whether the two-way interaction of Condition × Pretest score on the outcome variables predicted drop-out at each wave. No significant interactions were found.

Lifetime illicit substance use index

Point-in-time analyses of the ISUI showed significant overall intervention-control

Discussion

Overall, the effects of interventions delivered via the PROSPER partnership-based delivery system on long-term, adolescent substance use outcomes were robust, considering both growth across the middle- and high-school years, as well as point-in-time results for 5.5 and 6.5 years past-baseline. Positive long-term effects were observed for lifetime illicit use and for current use and frequencies of use, for all types of substances. Relative reduction rates for point-in-time outcomes ranged from

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflict of interest to report.

Acknowledgments

Work on this paper was supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (grant DA 013709).

References (37)

  • K. Grumbach et al.

    A health care cooperative extension service: transforming primary care and community health

    JAMA

    (2009)
  • W.B. Hansen

    Prevention programs: what are the critical factors that spell success?

  • H. Harwood

    Updating Estimates of the Economic Costs of Alcohol Abuse in the United States: Estimates, Update Methods, and Data

    (2000)
  • H.J. Harwood et al.

    The Economic Costs of Drug Abuse in the United States, 1992–1998

    (2001)
  • J.D. Hawkins et al.

    Testing communities that care: the rationale, design and behavioral baseline equivalence of the community youth development study

    Prev. Sci.

    (2008)
  • J.D. Hawkins et al.

    Sustained decreases in risk exposure and youth problem behaviors after installation of the Communities That Care prevention system in a randomized trial

    Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med.

    (2012)
  • L.D. Johnston et al.

    Monitoring the Future National Results on Adolescent Drug Use: Overview of Key Findings, 2011

    (2012)
  • P. Mathurin et al.

    Effect of binge drinking on the liver: an alarming public health issue?

    Gu

    (2009)
  • Cited by (70)

    • Parent-based interventions to improve multiple lifestyle risk behaviors among adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis

      2022, Preventive Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      One third of successful studies (5/15)(Choo et al., 2020; Marsiglia et al., 2019a; Mason et al., 2012; Estrada et al., 2015; Gonzales et al., 2012) were underpinned by ecodevelopmental theory, most of which were interventions targeting alcohol and tobacco use. The majority of effective studies(Chen et al., 2011; Choo et al., 2020; Kim and Leve, 2011; St George et al., 2013; St George, 2014; Mason et al., 2012; Spoth et al., 2011; Estrada et al., 2015; Gonzales et al., 2012; Spoth et al., 2013; Pourshamsian et al., 2019) (11/15) used some form of weekly interaction to prompt participant involvement and commitment to the study (ranging from weekly text messages to 3 online lessons per week). There were no clear characteristics of successful studies in terms of follow-up length or participant age.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text