Elsevier

Preventive Medicine

Volume 45, Issues 2–3, August–September 2007, Pages 189-197
Preventive Medicine

Modifiable family and school environmental factors associated with smoking status among adolescents in Guangzhou, China

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.02.009Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective.

To identify modifiable family and school environmental factors associated with Chinese adolescent smoking behaviors including never-smoking, experimental smoking, regular smoking, and attempting to quit.

Methods.

A cross-sectional survey using self-reported questionnaires was conducted in Huangpu, Guangzhou in December of 2004. A total of 3957 pupils agreed to complete the questionnaires. The prevalence odds ratio (risk) of experimental smoking was compared to never-smoking, adjusting for gender and age in unconditional logistic regression analysis. The risk of regular smoking was compared to experimental smoking, and the risk of attempting quitting was analyzed in regular smokers.

Results.

The cigarette smoking of peers, mothers, fathers, brothers, and supervising teachers, passive smoking, and seeing someone smoking on campus increased the risk of experimental smoking vs. nonsmoking, while no-smoking signs, perceived anti-tobacco atmosphere in school, and being taught smoking-related health knowledge decreased the risk. The factors associated with regular smoking compared to experimental smoking included the smoking of peers, brothers, fathers and supervising teachers, teacher's tolerance, and passive smoking. Being taught smoking-related knowledge, perceived anti-tobacco atmosphere and no-smoking signs in school were positively associated with regular smoker's attempt to quit, while supervising teacher's smoking, parents' and teachers' tolerance could delay it.

Conclusions.

These modifiable family and school environmental factors as well as their interaction with gender and age should be highly considered in adolescent smoking prevention in China.

Introduction

Many previous studies showed that adolescent smoking was associated with various demographic characteristics (Kandel et al., 2004), exposure to mass media (Unger et al., 1995, Fielding et al., 2004), social measures (Crawford et al., 2002, Griesbach et al., 2002), interpersonal factors (von Bothmer et al., 2002, Challier et al., 2000, Holm et al., 2003, Parna et al., 2003), intrapersonal characteristics (Tyas and Pederson, 1998, Challier et al., 2000), socio-economic status (SES) (de Vries, 1995), and cultural background (Rissel et al., 2000, Dornelas et al., 2005, Ellickson et al., 2003). Some of these factors, such as gender, age, genetics, family's SES, and cultural background are fixed or not practically modifiable by public health practice. Other factors that can be changed or improved are called “modifiable factors”. There is no doubt that modifiable factors should become the focus of tobacco control among adolescents. Due to their obvious advantages, schools and families are often used as the settings for adolescent smoking prevention interventions. According to social learning theory (Bandura, 1969, Bandura, 1977), adolescents with low self-regulation might learn to smoke through observing and modeling others' behavior of cigarette smoking. Moreover, their smoking attempts can be reinforced or punished by family and school smoking environments. Fortunately, most family and school smoking environments are modifiable, such as parental smoking, sibling's smoking, parents' and teachers' tolerance of adolescent smoking, teachers' smoking, classmates' smoking, school smoking policy, and school physical and social environments.

A four-stage model of transitional adolescent smoking behavior has been proposed: preparatory stage, trial stage, experimental stage, and regular smoking (Flay et al., 1983). Primary prevention of smoking involves prevention of early trying or experimental use and advance to regular smoking, whereas secondary prevention concerns getting experimenters or regular tobacco users to quit (Flay et al., 1998). Many studies in western countries found that some socioeconomic, psychological, and biological factors had different impacts on the development of the four smoking stages (Mayhew et al., 2000). A longitudinal study showed that the important correlates of transition from trial to experimental use included friends' smoking and approval, cigarette offers by friends, smoking intentions, school grade, and alcohol and marijuana use. The significant predictors of the transition from experimental to regular use included only parental smoking and family conflicts (Flay et al., 1998). The variation of transition predictors suggests that smokers of different stages might be sensitive to different intervention measures, which has important implication for adolescent smoking prevention.

Chinese adolescents live in family and school environments that are substantially different from American adolescents. These social differences may be important predictors of the transition or transfer of adolescent smoking stages in China. For example, the emphasized family value and small family size (one family, one child) might bring some positive and negative influence into the development of Chinese adolescent behaviors, including tobacco use. On one hand, adolescents' behaviors get more parental attention and thus their unfavorable smoking attempts may diminish or disappear with parental objection. However, on the other hand, some parents may overindulge their children for the reason of love, which sometimes put the children at the risk of unhealthy or dangerous behaviors (e.g. smoking). Different from their counterparts in US, most Chinese schools are public and managed by governments in a standardized fashion. The government policies have overwhelming impacts on the school administration and students. Although the smoking ban is commonly wrote out in the student handbook, the implement effect depends on the anti-smoking school atmosphere and perceived importance of tobacco control by administrative staff in each school. The intervention results will be promising if the local governments could highlight tobacco control in school management. Therefore, identifying the significant family and school environmental factors in Chinese cultural and social background may contribute to preventing both the onset of adolescent smoking and the advance to regular smoking. However, neither Chinese nor English publications from the Chinese mainland have explored this field.

In this paper, modifiable family and school environmental factors will be quantified and examined in association with the four smoking stages among Chinese adolescents in Guangzhou. We hypothesize that modifiable family and school environmental factors are important predictors of the different stages of adolescent smoking.

Section snippets

Sampling procedure

This study involved Chinese students in grades 7 through 9 who came from six secondary schools (cluster sampling) out of 18 at Huangpu District in Guangzhou, a central city of South China. A total of 4138 students were contacted in the population sample. Consent letters were obtained from students and their parents before investigation. Most of the sampled students (95.6%, n = 3957) agreed to participate in this survey and completed the questionnaires. The survey procedure got an official

Demographic characteristics of subjects

Among all students, 2021 (51.1%) were male, 1850 (46.8%) were female and the remaining 86 (2.2%) did not report their gender. Their ages ranged from 11 to 17 years (mean = 13.7, median = 14). Other demographic characteristics are listed in Table 1.

Smoking behaviors

According their self-report, the prevalence of never-smoking in secondary school students was 79.5% (3146/3957), of experimental smoking was 15.4 (611/3957), and of regular smoking was 5.1% (200/3957). The prevalence of smoking behaviors was significantly

Discussion

This survey in 3957 Chinese adolescents provides information that may help us to better understand what modifiable environmental factors are associated with different smoking stages. The smoking of family members, peers, and supervising teachers, passive smoking, and seeing someone smoking on campus were associated with the risk of experimental smoking, while no-smoking signs, anti-tobacco atmosphere in school, and being taught smoking-related knowledge were associated with a decreased risk. As

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the Chinese Medicine Board in New York (CMB 00-729). The authors sincerely acknowledge the contribution of Huangpu Education Bureau and six secondary schools. We also appreciate Professor Zhijin Wang, Dr. Yuming Chen, and Dr. Yuantao Hao for their assistance in developing the questionnaire.

References (38)

  • M.Q. Wang et al.

    Family and peer influences on smoking behavior among American adolescents: an age trend

    J. Adolesc. Health

    (1995)
  • A. Bandura

    Principles of Behavior Modification

    (1969)
  • A. Bandura

    Social Learning Theory

    (1977)
  • B. Challier et al.

    Associations of family environment and individual factors with tobacco, alcohol, and illicit drug use in adolescents

    Eur. J. Epidemiol.

    (2000)
  • L. Chassin et al.

    Changes in peer and parent influence during adolescence: longitudinal versus cross-sectional perspectives on smoking initiation

    Dev. Psychol.

    (1986)
  • S. Clayton

    Gender differences in psychosocial determinants of adolescent smoking

    J. Sch. Health

    (1991)
  • M.A. Crawford et al.

    Tobacco Control Network Writing Group. Responses to tobacco control policies among youth

    Tob. Control

    (2002)
  • R. Fielding et al.

    Declines in tobacco brand recognition and ever-smoking rates among young children following restrictions on tobacco advertisements in Hong Kong

    J. Public Health (Oxf)

    (2004)
  • B.R. Flay et al.

    Cigarette smoking: why young people do it and ways of preventing it

  • Cited by (37)

    • Cumulative risks and promotive factors for Chinese adolescent problem behaviors

      2016, Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Most researchers studying adolescent resiliency have focused on single risk factors or promotive factors, for example, negative peer influence or parental–child attachment, rather than considering the cumulative effects of multiple factors (Ostaszewski & Zimmerman, 2006). Most researchers that have examined multiple factors of problem behaviors, however, focused on only one or two contextual levels (Wen et al., 2007). Yet, in the face of a particular constellation of risks within specific social contexts, a single aspect of promotive factors may not be sufficient to help youth overcome the effects of multiple risks (Rutter, 1987).

    • Smoking behaviors and intentions among adolescents in rural China: The application of the Theory of Planned Behavior and the role of social influence

      2015, Addictive Behaviors
      Citation Excerpt :

      Given the significant effect of peer influences observed in the present study, peer education involving adolescent ex-smokers may be a promising intervention approach (Starkey, Audrey, Holliday, Moore, & Campbell, 2009). Whereas some studies reported that parental smoking played an important role in smoking onset of their children (Flay et al., 1994; Petraitis, Flay, & Miller, 1995) others did not find a strong association (Ma et al., 2008; Wen et al., 2007). Our study did not specifically examine parental influence.

    • A systematic review of secondhand tobacco smoke exposure and smoking behaviors: Smoking status, susceptibility, initiation, dependence, and cessation

      2015, Addictive Behaviors
      Citation Excerpt :

      Of the ten studies that examined the association between SHSe and smoking cessation in our review, seven studies were cross-sectional designs, (Grana et al., 2012; Kalkhoran et al., 2013; Manzoli et al., 2005; Okoli & Khara, 2014; Okoli et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2013; Wen et al., 2007) two were longitudinal, (Helgason et al., 2004; Kashigar et al., 2013) and one was a case–control study (see Table 5) (Şahbaz et al., 2008). Two studies examined this association with samples of youth; (Wang et al., 2013; Wen et al., 2007) six studied this association with adults (Helgason et al., 2004; Kalkhoran et al., 2013; Kashigar et al., 2013; Manzoli et al., 2005; Okoli & Khara, 2014; Okoli et al., 2008). The majority of findings supported a significant association between SHSe and poor smoking cessation.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text