Elsevier

Preventive Medicine

Volume 41, Issues 3–4, September–October 2005, Pages 707-719
Preventive Medicine

Applying a stage model of behavior change to colon cancer screening

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.12.013Get rights and content

Abstract

Background.

There has been limited use of stages of change models in characterizing colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. We assess the applicability of the Precaution Adoption Model (PAPM) by determining the distribution of stages of adoption and by elucidating differences among stages.

Methods.

The study is based on 1394 responses (69%) to a survey mailed in 2002 to patients in a primary care population. Survey measures included: self-reported CRC screening, sociodemographic characteristics, health system characteristics, attitudes and beliefs about CRC screening, perceived vulnerability to CRC, and worry about CRC. The main outcome was PAPM stage of adoption of CRC screening based on the ACS preferred guidelines: colonoscopy every 10 years alone or the combination annual FOBT plus sigmoidoscopy every 5 years.

Results.

57% were up-to-date with at least one test; 36% were up-to-date with the ACS preferred guidelines; provider recommendation, positive family history of CRC, and positive decisional balance score were significantly associated with higher compared to lower PAPM stages.

Conclusions.

The combination of PAPM stage assignment and other factors provides useful information for designing tailored interventions. There are special challenges in developing and interpreting PAPM stage assignments when a guideline offers multiple pathways to adherence and recommends a combination of two tests as a preferred option.

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-specific death for men and for women combined in the United States (American Cancer Society, 2003) and accounted for approximately 57,000 deaths in 2003 (American Cancer Society, 2003). A number of studies have demonstrated that screening for CRC is effective in reducing CRC-specific mortality (Mandel et al., 1993, Selby et al., 1992, Winawer et al., 1993, Newcomb et al., 1992, Mueller and Sonnenberg, 1995, Pignone et al., 2002b). However, specific screening recommendations are complex because multiple screening options are available, reflecting evidence that several individual tests as well as combinations of tests are effective (U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, 2002, Pignone et al., 2002a). Also, the recommendations are complex because each test must be repeated periodically at a specific intervals ranging from 1 to 10 years. Various professional groups recommend some or all of the following individual tests or combinations for those at average risk: annual fecal occult blood test (FOBT), sigmoidoscopy (SIG) every 5 years, a combination of annual FOBT and SIG every 5 years, double contract barium enema (DCBE) every 5–10 years, or colonoscopy (COL) every 10 years (Winawer et al., 1997, Byers et al., 1997, Goldstein and Messing, 1998, Primary and Preventive Care: Periodic Assessments, 2000, Colorectal Cancer Screening, 2001). While the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force does not state a preference for any one or a combination of tests, the American Cancer Society (ACS) has stated a preference for the combination of FOBT and SIG or COL because emerging epidemiologic evidence suggests that including SIG or COL in a screening regimen can significantly improve screening effectiveness. Despite efforts by a coalition of national groups to publicize screening recommendations during the past few years, adherence rates for CRC screening are still low (Screening for colorectal cancer, 1999). Comparable data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System reported in 1997, 1999, and 2001 suggest that less than half of the U.S. population aged 50 years and over are current with minimal CRC screening and that the annual rate of increase in adherence has been relatively low, about 1–2% per year absolute increase on average (Seeff et al., 2001).

Most previous studies have examined either factors associated with completion of any of the CRC screening tests (Zapka et al., 2002, Vernon et al., 1997, Arveux et al., 1992, Weitzman et al., 2001, Vernon, 1997) or associated with the intention to complete at least one of the tests (Watts et al., 2003, De Vellis et al., 1990, Myers et al., 1994, Herbert et al., 1997, Myers et al., 1998, Weller et al., 1995). Three reports (Manne et al., 2002, Trauth et al., 2003, Brenes and Paskett, 2000) have investigated factors associated with the stages of adoption using the Transtheoretical Model (Prochaska et al., 1997). Manne et al. (2002) reported on the correlates of stage of adoption in a high-risk group, namely siblings of individuals with CRC. This study used the combination FOBT in the last year plus SIG in the prior 3–5 years or COL in the last 10 years as the measure of compliance. The focus was an exploration of psychological and attitudinal factors and family relationships. Trauth et al. (2003) examined mainly socioeconomic variables in relation to stage of adoption and the use of FOBT or SIG in two low-income populations in 1999. Brenes and Paskett (2000) studied the association of stage of adoption for SIG alone in low-income African-American women. Our study is unique in that we explored the stages of CRC screening adoption based on the Precaution Adoption Process Model (PAPM) (Weinstein, 1988, Weinstein and Sandman, 1992) in a primary care population typical of a mid-sized community from which the sample was drawn. We assessed the applicability of PAPM to CRC screening by examining a number of measures including socioeconomic and health system variables, relevant attitudes and beliefs, and each of the CRC screening behaviors FOBT, SIG, COL, and DCBE, as well as the combination of FOBT and SIG.

Classifying individuals by the stage of adoption of a health behavior has proven useful in tailoring interventions because subjects grouped within a stage tend to share similar knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and barriers relevant to the behavior, and often have a different pattern of these attributes compared to those in other stages. Most studies focusing on stages of adoption allocate subjects to stages based on their stance towards a relatively simple, measurable behavioral outcome (e.g. quitting smoking, engaging in physical activity of a designated intensity, getting a screening test). We elected to focus on the ACS preferred screening guidelines, which define complete screening as one of the following: (1) COL in the last 10 years, (2) FOBT annually and SIG in the last 5 years, or (3) DCBE in the last 10 years (see http://www.cancer.org/docroot/CRI/content/CRI_2_2_3X_How_is_colorectal_cancer_found.asp?sitearea). We chose the ACS preferred guidelines because of the emerging emphasis on COL and SIG in CRC screening and because these guidelines were adopted by all the PCPs in our study. However, becoming compliant and maintaining compliance with ACS preferred CRC screening is conceptually more complex than some health behaviors for several reasons: (1) There are two pathways to compliance (COL, and the combination of FOBT and SIG); (2) Partial compliance may be achieved by getting one test on the FOBT/SIG pathway; (3) Ongoing compliance requires repetition of the tests at different intervals ranging from 1 to 10 years; and (4) Adherence can be achieved whether a test is done for screening or for diagnostic purposes.

This study examines the stages of adoption of the ACS preferred CRC screening guidelines and is based on a mailed survey sent in 2002 to patients of primary care providers in a major hospital-based health care system in an exurban Northeastern county. The two organizing questions are: (1) What are the stages of adoption of CRC screening among members of a representative primary care patient population? and (2) Are there unique characteristics and important differences among the various stages of adoption of CRC screening?

Section snippets

Study setting

The survey was part of a larger randomized controlled study designed to assess the effectiveness of a tailored telephone counseling intervention to promote regular CRC screening among patients of community-based primary care providers (PCPs) in the UMass Memorial Health Care (UMMHC) System. The UMMHC system includes an extensive network of affiliated medical practices and hospitals and provides care for Worcester county area in central Massachusetts and in northern Connecticut.

Theoretical framework

The theoretical

Results

Sociodemographic and health system characteristics of the study sample are shown in Table 1. Seventy-five percent of the sample were between 50 and 64 years old. Sixty percent were female. The group was relatively homogeneous in terms of race/ethnicity (94% White; 6% non-White, and/or Hispanic). This racial/ethnic distribution reflects the area's general population. The majority of respondents had completed high school and a quarter had had some post-graduate education. Family income was

Discussion

In this study, identified sociodemographic characteristics, attitudes and beliefs, and healthcare factors were associated with PAPM stage of adoption of the ACS preferred CRC screening guideline in a primary care population typical of a mid-sized northeastern community. The relatively complex CRC guideline differs from most other, simpler, cancer screening guidelines because it offers two optional pathways to adherence (COL or FOBT and SIG), one of which requires the combination of two tests

Acknowledgments

Support provided by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Contract No. U57 CCU120639.

References (45)

  • J.G. Zapka et al.

    Healthcare system factors and colorectal cancer screening

    Am. J. Prev. Med.

    (2002)
  • American Cancer Society, 2003. Cancer Facts and Figures. Atlanta,...
  • A. Bandura

    Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory

    (1986)
  • S.J. Blalock et al.

    Osteoporosis prevention in premenopausal women: using a stage model approach to examine the predictors of behavior

    Health Psychol.

    (1996)
  • T. Byers et al.

    American Cancer Society guidelines for screening and surveillance for early detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: update 1997

    CA Cancer J. Clin.

    (1997)
  • Colorectal Cancer Screening

    Recommendations statement from the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care

    CMAJ

    (2001)
  • B.M. De Vellis et al.

    Predicting participation in cancer screening: the role of perceived behavioral control

    J. Appl. Soc. Psychol.

    (1990)
  • S. Erban et al.

    Colorectal cancer screening in Massachusetts: measuring compliance with current guidelines

    Eff. Clin. Pract.

    (2001)
  • M. Fishbein et al.

    Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research

    (1975)
  • Hammer, G.P., 1997. Hepatitis B Vaccine Acceptance Among Nursing Home Workers: Unpublished Dissertation, Department of...
  • C. Herbert et al.

    Factors affecting compliance with colorectal cancer screening in France: differences between intention to participate and actual participation

    Eur. J. Cancer Prev.

    (1997)
  • J.S. Mandel et al.

    Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood

    N. Engl. J. Med.

    (1993)
  • Cited by (84)

    • Variation in health beliefs across different types of cervical screening non-participants

      2018, Preventive Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      More specifically, those who are unaware or unengaged with colorectal cancer screening are less likely to have seen a health professional recently and have poorer self-rated health (Costanza et al., 2005). Moreover, the unaware are more fatalistic (Costanza et al., 2005), the unengaged are less worried and report lower perceived risk (Costanza et al., 2005; Ferrer et al., 2011), and those who have decided to be screened have higher self-efficacy scores and a greater correlation between risk perceptions and worry (Hester et al., 2015). These studies suggest that the PAPM provides a useful framework for considering different types of non-participant at colorectal screening and understanding differences in health beliefs between types of non-participant.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text