Elsevier

Hormones and Behavior

Volume 46, Issue 5, December 2004, Pages 618-627
Hormones and Behavior

Patterns of cortisol reactivity to laboratory stress

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2004.06.015Get rights and content

Abstract

Cortisol responses to a laboratory stress protocol were investigated in 82 male firefighters. Saliva samples were collected during an adaptation period beginning between 9 and 10 am, and then at the end of each of six 10-min trials (a mental arithmetic task, an inter-task recovery period, a speech task, and three recovery periods). Individual differences in the mean cortisol response to the stress tasks were characterized by variation in the direction of the response, as well as the size of the response. Neither pre-stress cortisol levels nor responses were correlated with cardiovascular and mood responses. Cortisol levels before stress task presentation were negatively correlated with recent stress severity. Larger mean cortisol responses were associated with lower reports of recent stress exposure, lower negative affect scores, and a coping style characterized less experience of anger, more control over anger expression, and a tendency to screen out threatening information in stressful situations. Thus, increased cortisol activity was associated with less recent stress exposure and a more adaptive behavioral style than for those whose cortisol levels fell or were largely unchanged in response to a laboratory stressor.

Introduction

Increased cortisol activity has been demonstrated in response to laboratory and daily life stress (e.g., Brantley et al., 1988, Deinzer et al., 1997, Kirschbaum et al., 1992). Generally, the more salient and intense a stimulus, the larger the response, thus parachute jumping elicits far larger responses than public mental arithmetic or speech task performance (Deinzer et al., 1997 vs. Kirschbaum et al., 1992). However, there are some inconsistencies with a simple linear stress–response relationship. Cortisol decreases during stress in some individuals (Heim et al., 2000), and lower cortisol levels with higher recent stress exposure (Roy et al., 2003). Differences in the pattern of cortisol responses also introduce significant methodological problems (e.g., Deinzer et al., 1997), and there are inconsistencies concerning cortisol's association with other reactivity measures and measures of affect and coping.

Individual differences in part reflect the state of hypothalamic pituitary adrenal (HPA) regulation (Keller-Wood and Dallman, 1984), in turn modulated by antecedent events. However, cortisol is ubiquitous, and thus regulation serves diverse roles, for example, as an immune regulator (McEwen et al., 1997), as a promoter of energy mobilization (Sapolsky, 1992), and a potentiator of vascular catecholamine action (Walker and Williams (1992). Recent evidence has shown that cortisol responding is not unidirectional (Heim et al., 2000), and hypocortisolism describes a profile where there is a reduced mean output, hyporeactivity, enhanced negative feedback, or reduced receptor sensitivity. Munck et al. (1984) suggested that cortisol promotes equilibrium during stress (an allostatic agent), preventing an overshoot in the defense reaction and conserving resources. But one caveat is that serving one homeostatic goal may ultimately compromise another (e.g., potentiating catecholamine vasoconstriction), and thus generate allostatic load (McEwen and Seeman, 1999). Hypocortisolism as a component of the PTSD response profile (Yehuda et al., 1993), may be functionally analogous to the inadequate response allostatic load profile described by McEwen and Seeman (1999).

Variation in the patterns of cortisol responses represents an interesting challenge for the analysis of individual differences. Firstly, change scores are insensitive to changes that would have occurred simply as a function of diurnal variation, a problem also for response algorithms such as area under the curve. As the diurnal pattern is absent or unstable in almost 50% of individuals (Smyth et al., 1997), sampling on a control day is not reliable. Variation in the timing of responses also presents a problem (Deinzer et al., 1997, Richter et al., 1996), as does variation in the direction of the cortisol change (Heim et al., 2000, Rose and Fogg, 1993). Lastly, Kirschbaum et al. (1995) found that reactivity across five repeated daily stress sessions did not habituate in only 35%.

Some studies have found that high cardiovascular reactors exhibit larger adrenocortical responses (Cacioppo et al., 1995, Sgoutas Emch et al., 1994). However, Lovallo et al. (1990) found this was limited to aversive stressors. al'Absi et al. (1994) found that borderline hypertensives showed larger cortisol responses than normotensives to continuous but not intermittent stress tasks. Thus, greater autonomic reactivity appeared to be associated with greater cortisol reactivity, but only for certain stress task characteristics.

Various factors may contribute to inconsistent findings, including operationalization of cortisol activity (e.g., level, reactivity), moderating factors (e.g., coping styles or recent stress exposure history). Ellenbogen et al. (2001) found depression was differentially associated with stress response change scores (negatively correlated) and the recovery level (positively correlated). Roy et al. (2001) found cortisol recovery (recovery-stress) was not associated with depression or anxiety, and Young and Nolen-Hoeksema (2001) found no association between cortisol responses and tendency to ruminate (passive and repetitive focus on distress). Pruessner et al. (1997) raise a methodological issue, finding reliable associations only when cortisol responses were averaged over multiple sessions. Scarpa and Luscher (2002) found self-esteem differentially modulated the association with depression, a cortisol fall predicting low self-esteem depression, an increase predicting high self-esteem depression, and the highest depression scores predicted by a cortisol fall and low self-esteem. A number of studies have reported a negative association between measures of recent stress exposure and current cortisol activity, particularly where there is extreme variation in exposure to stress (e.g., PTSD, Yehuda et al., 1993; combat Bourne et al., 1967), but also in response to relatively common fluctuations in daily life stress exposure (e.g., Roy et al., 2003). Coping (disengagement) has also been implicated in the hypocortisolism response to stress exposure described in PTSD (Mason et al., 2001).

The primary aim of this paper was to explore sources of individual difference in the laboratory stress salivary cortisol response. The presumption that cortisol levels increase under conditions of stress seems to be violated by results from several studies. It is hypothesized that laboratory stress will be associated with an increase in cortisol in some participants, little change in some, and a reduction in the cortisol level in others. Analyses explore whether cortisol responses were associated with cortisol levels before the stress challenge. The study investigated whether changes in cortisol activity were associated with changes in cardiovascular and mood responses. Due to the inconclusive nature of previous studies, it was hypothesized that there would be no generalized reactivity pattern across measures (cortisol, cardiovascular, and mood responses) and that change scores would be uncorrelated. Finally, the study investigated the association between cortisol activity and measures of affect, coping, and recent stress exposure.

Section snippets

Participants

Ninety male probationary firefighters (age range, 19–32) took part in the study soon after completing basic training, although the analyses in this paper are based upon 82 participants, eight being removed due to incomplete data. Female probationary firefighters were not included in the study as they represented less than 1% of the training cohort at the time of recruitment.

Cortisol

Unlike electrophysiological response measures (e.g., ECG), which are relatively immediate, and which can be evaluated in

Background characteristics

The average age was 25 years (19–31, SEM 0.4), and their average body mass index was 24.4 (19.1–29.3). All participants were normotensive; however, 35.6% of subjects reported a parental cardiovascular illness. Thirty-four reported being either occasional or frequent smokers, but a χ2 analysis revealed no significant association between smoking status (smoker vs. non-smoker) and cortisol response group (≥3 SEM fall, 1–3 SEM fall, ±1 SEM change, 1–3 SEM increase, and ≥3 SEM increase). Descriptive

Discussion

The study was conducted in a fairly homogenous sample of healthy young firefighters who had recently completed their basic training and commenced probationary attachments to London fire stations. The range of affect scores (Table 1) suggested that the participants were relatively free from depression and anxiety. One third were either occasional or frequent smokers; however, χ2 analysis did not indicate an association between smoking status and cortisol response grouping. Previously, when

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Medical Research Council, UK. The authors are grateful to the London Fire and Civil Defense Authority for their cooperation.

References (60)

  • M.P. Roy et al.

    Psychological, cardiovascular, and metabolic correlates of individual differences in cortisol stress recovery in young men

    Psychoneuroendocrinology

    (2001)
  • H. Rüddel et al.

    Hemodynamic response patterns to mental stress: diagnostic and therapeutic implications

    Am. Heart J.

    (1988)
  • A. Scarpa et al.

    Self-esteem, cortisol reactivity, and depressed mood mediated by perceptions of control

    Biol. Psychol.

    (2002)
  • E.A. Shirtcliff et al.

    Use of salivary biomarkers in biobehavioral research: cotton-based sample collection methods can interfere with salivary immunoassay results

    Psychoneuroendocrinology

    (2001)
  • J.M. Smyth et al.

    Individual differences in the diurnal cycle of cortisol

    Psychoneuroendocrinology

    (1997)
  • S. Wüst et al.

    Genetic factors, perceived chronic stress, and the free cortisol response to awakening

    Psychoneuroendocrinology

    (2000)
  • E.A. Young

    Effects of ruminations on the saliva cortisol response to a social stressor

    Psychoneuroendocrinology

    (2001)
  • M. al'Absi et al.

    Borderline hypertensives produce exaggerated adrenocortical responses to mental stress

    Psychosom. Med.

    (1994)
  • A. Beck

    An inventory for measuring depression

    Arch. Gen. Psychiatry

    (1961)
  • J.A. Boscarino

    Post-traumatic stress disorder, exposure to combat, and lower plasma cortisol among Vietnam veterans: findings and clinical implications

    J. Consult. Clin. Psychol.

    (1996)
  • P.G. Bourne et al.

    Urinary 17 OHCS levels. Data on seven helicopter ambulance medics in combat

    Arch. Gen. Psychiatry

    (1967)
  • P.J. Brantley et al.

    A daily stress inventory: development, reliability, and validity

    J. Behav. Med.

    (1987)
  • P.J. Brantley et al.

    Convergence between the daily stress inventory and endocrine measures of stress

    J. Consult. Clin. Psychol.

    (1988)
  • J.T. Cacioppo et al.

    Heterogeneity in neuroendocrine and immune responses to brief psychological stressors as a function of autonomic cardiac activation

    Psychosom. Med.

    (1995)
  • R.T. Chatterton et al.

    Hormonal responses to psychological stress in men preparing for skydiving

    J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.

    (1997)
  • L.R. Derogatis

    The Derogatis Stress Profile DSP®

    (1980)
  • R.A. Dressendorfer et al.

    Synthesis of a cortisol-biotin conjugate and evaluation as a tracer in an immunoassay for salivary cortisol measurement

    J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol.

    (1992)
  • M.A. Ellenbogen et al.

    Stress and selective attention: the interplay of mood, cortisol levels, and emotional information processing

    Am. J. Psychiatry

    (2001)
  • T. Field

    Violence and touch deprivation in adolescents

    Adolescence

    (2002)
  • A.D. Kanner et al.

    Comparisons of two modes of stress measurement: daily hassles and uplifts versus major life events

    J. Behav. Med.

    (1981)
  • Cited by (35)

    • Reducing cultural mismatch: Latino students' neuroendocrine and affective stress responses following cultural diversity and inclusion reminder

      2020, Hormones and Behavior
      Citation Excerpt :

      Heightened affective reactivity to stress is also implicated in risk for mental and physical health problems (Pascoe and Smart Richman, 2009). Some evidence indicates affective responses to stress are unrelated to HPA responses (e.g., Roy, 2004), suggesting this affective pathway may be distinct from physiological reactivity. Institutional cultural barriers facing Latino and other underrepresented college students likely play a unique role in activating and/or maintaining stress responses (Stephens et al., 2012a, 2012b).

    • Effects of orthostasis on endocrine responses to psychosocial stress

      2013, International Journal of Psychophysiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Furthermore, subjects are also often required to walk between different rooms in a laboratory (i.e. resting and testing room). Besides these well-established stress tests (Dickerson and Kemeny, 2004a; Gaab et al., 2003; Roy, 2004; Singh, Petrides, Gold, Chrousos, and Deuster, 1999), effects of orthostasis on parameters of the SAM system and the HPA axis have been observed (Bie, Secher, Astrup, and Warberg, 1986; Matzen, Secher, Knigge, Bach, and Warberg, 1992; Vlcek, Radikova, Penesova, Kvetnansky, and Imrich, 2008). Assuming the upright posture leads to sharp rises in catecholamine concentrations, especially in norepinephrine (NE).

    • Acute psychosocial stress: Does the emotional stress response correspond with physiological responses?

      2012, Psychoneuroendocrinology
      Citation Excerpt :

      With respect to the often observed desynchrony between these systems during the treatment of anxiety disorders, it has been proposed that they represent multiple independently varying components instead of composing a “single, synchronized system” (Abelson and Curtis, 1989, p. 565). In line with Roy (2004), we conclude that particular psychophysiological interrelations during acute stress situations could also follow a similar pattern. More importantly, they cannot be studied independently of moderating factors.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text