Elsevier

Vaccine

Volume 24, Supplement 3, 21 August 2006, Pages S63-S70
Vaccine

Chapter 7: Achievements and limitations of cervical cytology screening

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.05.113Get rights and content

Abstract

This chapter reviews the contribution of cervical cytology, what makes it successful, the management of screen positives and how technological advances may affect its use in the future. Cervical screening has saved hundreds of thousands of lives but has not been available to women in the poorest countries. In countries where wide coverage has been achieved and quality assurance is in place, incidence and death rates have fallen by over 50% even though cervical cytology is logistically complex. The management of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) is very effective, but low-grade cytological abnormalities require care to avoid over-treatment. The increasing rate of human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and the prospect of prophylactic vaccination will change the way cervical cytology is used, possibly giving way to HPV testing as the primary test in secondary prevention.

Introduction

This monograph sets out to explore the role of HPV as the principal cause of cervical cancer, as well as the means of screening for it and ultimately, through vaccination, the means of preventing it. It is appropriate, therefore, to devote a chapter to reflect on the achievements of cervical cytology as the standard for secondary prevention that has been variably deployed in developed healthcare systems for 40 years. It is currently estimated that systematic screening can reduce death rates from cervical cancer by 70% or more. In the United Kingdom, this translates into at least 1000 lives per year among a population of 50 million [1], [2]. It is also considered highly cost-effective. With an incidence beginning to rise in the late 20s and peaking in the mid 40s, loss of life years per cervical cancer case is often high, both as a mother and wife. When extended across North America, Europe, Australasia and the Pacific Rim, the number of lives saved will have run into hundreds of thousands. Unfortunately, the benefits of screening have not been available to countries in the developing world due to a lack of resources, and this has been disastrous for women, with 80% of cervical cancer incidence and mortality occurring in these countries [3].

Treatment of pre-invasive lesions identified in screening programmes, has also enabled preservation of fertility, which is a crucial issue for many women, and, as a consequence, women around the world have developed great confidence in the “Pap Test” or “cervical smear”. Thus, any strategies to replace it will need to outperform it in terms of effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, safety and acceptability.

This chapter will review the successes and failures of cervical cytology from an epidemiological and clinical viewpoint and will touch on the psychosocial costs which some women endure. New technology has impacted on cytological techniques and has the potential to do so further in the near future.

Section snippets

Pathogenesis of cervical cancer

Cervical cancer arises in the so-called transformation zone of the uterine cervix. This is the area which undergoes physiological metaplasia from glandular to squamous epithelium at the onset of adolescence. HPV infection is very common in young women after the onset of sexual activity, and when it persists, the viral oncoproteins produce perturbation of the cell-cycle controls, resulting in CIN. At their mildest (CIN-1), these lesions are generally no more than manifestations of HPV infection,

Public health considerations

Since the development of cytology-based cervical cancer screening using the Pap smear in the mid 20th century, Pap smears and new cytological technologies such as liquid-based cytology have been implemented for secondary prevention of cervical cancer. Although some have argued that there is no direct evidence of the impact of cytology screening on cervical cancer, such as evidence from a randomized clinical trial (RCT), there are overwhelming and convincing epidemiologic data to infer the

What makes a screening programme work?

When viewed from the perspective of a population as opposed to that of an individual woman, there are a number of key considerations which come into play when assessing why programmes work. Insight can be gained from the UK screening programme, which was launched in the late 1980s after 20 years of essentially opportunistic activity. Between 1988 and 1995, the incidence fell by 40% (Fig. 2) and by 2004 the death rate from cervical cancer had fallen by almost 50% [9]. The key to this success lay

Overview

The management of screen positives has been a crucial element in the success of cervical screening. The challenge has always been to ensure that the benefits of treating women who are found through colposcopic examination to have CIN outweigh the risks of treatment. There is, of course, a spectrum in this benefit/harm balance. While excision of CIN-3 is mandatory by most, destructive treatment is still used by some. Aggressive treatment in women with CIN-1 risks doing more harm than good, and

Technology in cervical cytology

The Pap test has survived virtually unchanged for 50 years, a testimony to its efficacy. During the last 10 years, however, two technological advances have come to the forefront. The first of these is liquid-based cytology (LBC) where, instead of spreading the exfoliate, obtained with a spatula, onto a glass slide and fixing, the exfoliate is stirred immediately into a pot containing a preservative and, on receipt at the laboratory, the cells are aspirated onto a filter and similarly stained on

Conclusions

Cervical screening works but there are some major challenges ahead. The most significant is that most women in the world have been denied any form of prevention, which, if continued, will result in a million deaths from this disease over the next 5 years. If this situation is to change there has to be a new approach, such as a strategy of primary prevention, a possibility offered by vaccination. Otherwise, affordable, cost-effective strategies of secondary prevention, which are feasible in

Disclosed potential conflicts of interest

HCK: Consultant (GlaxoSmithKline)

JTC: Consultant (Digene Corporation, GlaxoSmithKline, 3M Pharmaceuticals); Speakers Bureau (Digene Corporation, 3M Pharmaceuticals); Data and Safety Monitoring Board (Merck and Co., Inc.)

References (35)

  • K. Nanda et al.

    Accuracy of the Papanicolaou test in screening for and follow-up of cervical cytologic abnormalities: a systematic review

    Ann Intern Med

    (2000)
  • Cuzick J, Clavel C, Petry KU, Meijer CJ, Hoyer H, Ratnam S, et al., Overview of the European and North American studies...
  • M.H. Stoler et al.

    Interobserver reproducibility of cervical cytologic and histologic interpretations: realistic estimates from the ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study

    JAMA

    (2001)
  • S.J. Goldie et al.

    Cost-effectiveness of cervical-cancer screening in five developing countries

    N Engl J Med

    (2005)
  • Cancer Stats, 2004 [accessed April 2006,...
  • M.F. Mitchell et al.

    A randomized clinical trial of cryotherapy, laser vaporization, and loop electrosurgical excision for treatment of squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix

    Obstet Gynecol

    (1998)
  • P.L. Martin-Hirsch et al.

    Surgery for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

    Cochrane Database System. Rev.

    (1999)
  • Cited by (225)

    • E-learning module for cytopathology education based on virtual microscopy

      2024, Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text