Elsevier

Urology

Volume 85, Issue 4, April 2015, Pages 737-741
Urology

Ambulatory, Office-based, and Geriatric Urology
Prospective Multi-institutional Study Analyzing Pain Perception of Flexible and Rigid Cystoscopy in Men

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2015.01.007Get rights and content

Objective

To evaluate pain perception in men undergoing flexible or rigid diagnostic cystoscopy.

Methods

This is a prospective multi-institutional analysis of men undergoing cystoscopy in 4 European departments of urology. Pain perception was assessed with an 11-point numeric rating scale. Pain categories were as follows: no (0 points), mild (1-3), moderate (4-6), and severe pain (7-10). Assessment of pain was before, during cystoscopy, and at days 1, 4, and 7 of follow-up.

Results

A total of 300 cystoscopies were analyzed (150 rigid and 150 flexible). Men undergoing flexible cystoscopy were more frequently free of pain (58.7% vs 24%; P <.0001). Mild pain (54% vs 30.7%; P <.0001) and moderate pain (18.7% vs 9.3%; P = .02) were more common with rigid devices. No significant differences were prevalent in severe pain perception (3.3% vs 1.3%; P = .25). Patients, who had previous experience with cystoscopy reported similar pain levels as patients naïve to cystoscopy, regardless if rigid (P = .92) or flexible (P = .26) devices were used. Pain decreased to the baseline during the 1-week follow-up after both, flexible and rigid cystoscopy. In multivariate regression analyses, rigid cystoscopy was an independent predictor for not being pain free (odds ratio [OR] = 0.15; confidence interval [CI] = 0.08-0.28; P <.0001), for experiencing mild pain (OR = 2.57; CI = 1.57-4.19; P <.0001), and for moderate pain (OR = 2.39; CI = 1.13-5.07; P = .02). Severe pain was seldom with both devices, and thus, no statistical difference was found.

Conclusion

Flexible diagnostic cystoscopy caused less pain than rigid cystoscopy in men. Patient's previous experience with cystoscopy did not influence pain sensation. The type of cystoscope itself was identified as an independent risk factor of pain perception.

Section snippets

Methods

After the study received institutional review board approvals, all men scheduled for routinely based outpatient cystoscopy for diagnostic purposes in 4 European departments of urology (Austria: Landesklinikum Baden-Mödling, Landesklinikum Korneuburg, Universitätsklinikum Sankt Pölten; Croatia: Klinički Bolnički Centar Split) were invited to be enrolled in the study if they matched our study criteria. Exclusion criteria were cystoscopies including any kind of intervention (eg, removal of a

Results

A total of 300 patients undergoing rigid (n = 150) and flexible cystoscopy (n = 150) were enrolled in the study. Baseline and pain perception at the moment of cystoscopy were evaluated in all of them. Of those 300 patients, 249 were eligible for follow-up analysis, resulting in a loss to follow-up of 17%.

Both groups (rigid vs flexible) were similar with respect to patient's age (64.9 vs 67.6 years; P = .3). Significantly more patients in the rigid group had previous experience with cystoscopy

Comment

The decision and necessity of conducting this prospective multi-institutional study evaluating the pain perception of men undergoing cystoscopy derived from several factors. First, rigid devices are still frequently used in our health care systems for outpatient cystoscopy. Second, not a single study similar to ours could be found on MEDLINE. Finally, the guidelines provided by the European Association of Urology do not recommend the utilization of one device over the other, leaving it to the

Conclusion

Flexible diagnostic cystoscopy caused less pain than rigid cystoscopy. Age, but not previous experience with cystoscopy, did influence pain sensation. The type of cystoscope itself was identified as an independent risk factor of pain perception.

Acknowledgment

The first author thanks explicitly all chairmen of the participating institutions, all urologists, and all nurses involved in the study for their efforts.

Cited by (0)

Financial Disclosure: The authors declare that they have no relevant financial interests.

View full text