Elsevier

Urology

Volume 71, Issue 5, May 2008, Pages 919-923
Urology

Oncology
Morbidity and Quality of Life in Elderly Patients Receiving Ileal Conduit or Orthotopic Neobladder After Radical Cystectomy for Invasive Bladder Cancer

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2007.11.125Get rights and content

Abstract

Objectives

The objectives of the study were to evaluate morbidity, survival, and quality of life (QoL) in elderly patients with invasive bladder cancer who received an orthotopic neobladder or an ileal conduit.

Methods

The charts of 85 patients, aged 75 or older (median age 78), who had received an ileal conduit (n = 53) or an orthotopic neobladder (n = 32) after radical cystectomy at 3 Italian institutions in the period January 2000 to September 2004 were retrospectively reviewed. Perioperative and postoperative complications were recorded, as well as survival data at last follow-up. QoL was evaluated in 34 of 37 patients who were alive at the time of analysis by using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) instruments quality of life questionnaire C30 (QLQ-C30) and QLQ-muscle-invasive bladder cancer module (QLQ-BLM).

Results

Multiple regression analysis showed that stage significantly affected survival whereas the type of urinary diversion did not. Global Health Status (GHS) scores in the neobladder group were higher than in the ileal conduit group but the difference was not statistically significant. The scores of all the QLQ multi-item scales and single-item measures were comparable in the 2 groups. Overall, 56% and 25% daytime and nighttime complete continence rates were observed in patients with an orthotopic neobladder.

Conclusions

The results of our retrospective analysis suggest that an orthotopic neobladder can be suitable for elderly patients with no additional morbidity compared with an ileal conduit. Both types of diversion seem to result in acceptable scores for most aspects of QoL, including urinary symptoms and continence rate. These figures may be helpful in the preoperative counselling of elderly patients with bladder cancer.

Section snippets

Study Design

The charts of 105 bladder cancer patients 75 years or older undergone radical cystectomy, followed by an ileal conduit or an orthotopic bladder substitution at 3 Italian institutions between January 2000 and October 2004 were reviewed. Eighty-five patients (53 ileal conduit and 32 bladder substitution, median age 78, range 75 to 88 years) of whom all preoperative (including American Society of Anesthesiologists [ASA] score) and follow-up information were available, entered the study, whereas

Results

Median age (range) was 77.5 years (75 to 82 years) in the neobladder group and 78.9 years (75 to 88 years) in the ileal conduit group (P = 0.03). No significant difference emerged in the clinical staging and gender distribution among patients in the 2 groups, whereas there was a significantly higher proportion of ASA scores17 III and IV in the group of patients receiving an ileal conduit. Table 1 reports the comparative data of the most relevant intraoperative and perioperative variables. No

Comment

Recent reports have shown that radical cystectomy can be safely performed in elderly individuals with low perioperative mortality, acceptable morbidity and in most cases without significant deviations from routine postoperative care.18, 19, 20 An ileal conduit is usually the urine diversion of choice in elderly patients.18 The feasibility of an orthotopic neobladder has been reported in 22 patients with no additional complications compared with an ileal conduit.11 However, comparative data in

Conclusions

In our retrospective analysis, elderly patients receiving bladder substitution showed no difference in survival or severe complications when compared with a group of patients of similar age who had an ileal conduit. Similarly, no significant differences in QoL outcomes could be detected.

References (27)

  • J. Ferlay et al.

    Estimates of the cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2006

    Ann Oncol

    (2007)
  • R.S. Lance et al.

    Cystectomy in the elderly

    Semin Urol Oncol

    (2001)
  • P.I. Karakiewicz et al.

    Precystectomy nomogram for prediction of advanced bladder cancer stage

    Eur Urol

    (2006)
  • N.M. Fahmy et al.

    Delay in the surgical treatment of bladder cancer and survival: systematic review of the literature

    Eur Urol

    (2006)
  • X. Game et al.

    Radical cystectomy in patients older than 75 years: assessment of morbidity and mortality

    Eur Urol

    (2001)
  • S.S. Chang et al.

    Radical cystectomy is safe in elderly patients at high risk

    J Urol

    (2001)
  • S.B. Farnham et al.

    Benefit of radical cystectomy in the elderly patient with significant co-morbidities

    Urol Oncol

    (2004)
  • E.C. Skinner

    Quality of life with bladder reconstruction

    Semin Urol Oncol

    (2001)
  • M.P. Porter et al.

    Health related quality of life after radical cystectomy and urinary diversion for bladder cancer: a systematic review and critical analysis of the literature

    J Urol

    (2005)
  • J.P. Parkinson et al.

    Health related quality of life assessments for patients with bladder cancer

    J Urol

    (2004)
  • M. Soulie et al.

    A multicenter study of the morbidity of radical cystectomy in select elderly patients with bladder cancer

    J Urol

    (2002)
  • D.J. Parekh et al.

    Continent urinary reconstruction versus ileal conduit: a contemporary single-institution comparison of perioperative morbidity and mortality

    Urology

    (2000)
  • N.K. Aaronson et al.

    The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology

    J Natl Cancer Inst

    (1993)
  • Cited by (120)

    • Midterm Health-related Quality of Life After Radical Cystectomy: A Propensity Score–matched Analysis

      2020, European Urology Focus
      Citation Excerpt :

      First, we used the EORTC QLQ-C30, which is, unlike the EORTC QLQ-BLM30, not a bladder cancer–specific questionnaire and lacks additional information regarding body image, urostomy problems, and use of catheters. The QLQ-BLM30 has been used in several publications before, but is not validated [17–19]. Recently, the bladder-specific Bladder Utility Symptom Scale has been introduced, but has not been externally validated yet [20].

    • Patient Selection and Counseling for Urinary Diversion

      2018, Urologic Clinics of North America
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, physiologic age appears to be more closely associated with patient outcome when compared with chronologic age. For this reason, many centers advocate that no age limit should apply and that patient selection should instead be determined by surgical fitness, functional status, and motivation.41,42 There are several important contraindications to CDs in general, as well as those unique to ODs.

    • Quality of Life and Urinary Diversion

      2018, Urologic Clinics of North America
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text