Elsevier

Urology

Volume 72, Issue 5, November 2008, Pages 1068-1072
Urology

Laparoscopy and Robotics
The Cost of Learning Robotic-Assisted Prostatectomy

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2007.11.118Get rights and content

Objectives

To describe the costs associated with the learning curve of robotic-assisted prostatectomy (RAP).

Methods

A theoretical model of the cost of operative time during the learning curve for RAP was constructed. Within the theoretical model varying rates of improvement were considered, and once the learning curve was complete, the total cost of operative time was calculated. This cost was then compared with an actual series of RAP, whose operative time and associated costs during the learning curve were also calculated.

Results

In the theoretical model, surgeons improved at rates of 1, 5, or 10 minutes per case, and began the learning curve that required 8 or 9 hours to perform a single RAP. At the end of the learning curve it took either 3 or 4 hours. The most expensive learning curve was 360 cases long and cost $1.3 million; the least expensive learning curve was 24 cases and cost $95,000. The literature search involved 8 series, with a range of learning curves from 13 to 200 cases. The least expensive learning curve was $49,613 and the most expensive learning curve was $554,694. The average learning curve was 77 cases and cost $217,034.

Conclusions

Costs associated with operative time while learning RAP are substantial, and should be considered when deciding whether to implement RAP at an individual institution. RAP may best be suited to high volume prostatectomy centers, in which the learning curve can be rapidly traversed, and associated costs minimized.

Section snippets

Material and Methods

To determine the cost of a RAP learning curve, we devised a model that focused only on the cost of operating room (OR) time and anesthesia services during the learning curve. The learning curve was considered the time from adoption of RAP until a statistically significant nadir operative time was reached. We did not account for complications, length of stay, or blood loss in this study. In addition, oncologic outcome, impotence, and incontinence rates were not considered. Our study did not

Results

In our theoretical model, the shortest learning curve was 24 cases and the longest learning curve was 360 cases. These data are further illustrated in Table 1, Table 2. Operative costs correlate directly with the length of the learning curve, with the most expensive learning curve being $1,365,000, and the least expensive learning curve being $95,000.

Eight published series of RAP contained sufficient information to calculate the length of the learning curve. Among these series, the learning

Comment

Estimates of the length of the RAP learning curve range from 20 to 30 cases6, 9, 14 to more than 250 cases.8 Many surgeons consider the learning curve complete when they are comfortable with RAP; however, Herrell and Smith8 suggest the learning curve is complete only when surgeons perform an operation equivalent to RRP.

The difference in OR costs between 30 and 250 cases to learn RAP is roughly $900,000 in our theoretical model. In our literature-based analysis, the difference between the

Conclusions

Robotic prostatectomy is a reality of modern urologic practice; however, massive expenditures on health care in this country are also a reality. The daVinci robot likely will have numerous benefits in urologic surgery, but expenditures on a robot are taken from other portions of the health care system. Adoption of this procedure is likely to continue expanding, but we offer a new perspective on purchasing a robot and starting a robotics practice. The bottom line is that a daVinci robot is not

Cited by (0)

View full text