Oral medicineDo oral lesions associated with HIV affect quality of life?
Section snippets
Materials and Methods
This was a cross-sectional analytic study that compared 2 groups of HIV-positive patients (n = 150). For inclusion, patients had to be able to communicate in English, they had to be >18 years old at the time of study, HIV positivity had to be confirmed by a laboratory test, and signed informed consent had to be provided.
Participants in group 1 consisted of HIV-positive patients who presented with oral manifestations associated with HIV infection at the time of examination and interview. The
Demographic variables
A total of 150 HIV-positive patients (71 group 1, 79 group 2) were included in this study. Table I highlights some of the demographic variables that were assessed and compared in the study groups. The majority of the participants in both groups were female (group 1 67%, group 2 75%), and over 90% of patients interviewed were black. As shown in Table I, there were no significant differences (P > .05) noted for any of the demographic and patient-derived variables except mean age, which was
Discussion
The essential question that this study sought to answer was: “Do oral lesions associated with HIV infection affect oral health–related quality of life in HIV-positive patients?” To date, there is only 1 study indexed in the Medline database that has examined the impact of oral lesions associated with HIV infection on oral health–related quality of life. That study (Coates et al. [1996]15) differed fundamentally, in terms of its methodology, from the present study. The groups compared in the
Conclusion
Patients with lesions associated with HIV infection were found to have a significantly lower oral health–related quality of life than HIV-positive patients who have no oral lesions, when assessed using the OHIP instrument. Oral candidiasis, angular cheilitis, and oral hairy leukoplakia were the most common conditions associated with HIV infection in this cohort of patients.
The 2 methods used in the analysis of the data obtained with the OHIP instrument appear to have sufficient discriminant
References (21)
Why are we weighting?A critical examination of the use of item weights in a health status measure
Soc Sci Med
(1991)AIDS epidemic update December 2006Geneva, Switzerland
- et al.
Oral manifestations of HIV infection by gender and transmission category in Mexico City
J Oral Pathol Med
(1998) - et al.
Oral manifestations of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients in Singapore
Ann Acad Med Singapore
(2001) - et al.
Impact of dental conditions on patients' quality of life
Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol
(1989) - et al.
Measuring oral health: does your treatment really make a difference?
Br Dent J
(1999) - et al.
Development and evaluation of the Oral Health Impact Profile
Commun Dent Health
(1994) Measuring oral health: a conceptual framework
(1988)Derivation and validation of a short-form oral health impact profile
Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol
(1997)- et al.
An assessment of sensitivity to change of the Oral Health Impact Profile in a clinical trial
Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol
(2001)