Review
Herding in humans

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.08.002Get rights and content

Herding is a form of convergent social behaviour that can be broadly defined as the alignment of the thoughts or behaviours of individuals in a group (herd) through local interaction and without centralized coordination. We suggest that herding has a broad application, from intellectual fashion to mob violence; and that understanding herding is particularly pertinent in an increasingly interconnected world. An integrated approach to herding is proposed, describing two key issues: mechanisms of transmission of thoughts or behaviour between agents, and patterns of connections between agents. We show how bringing together the diverse, often disconnected, theoretical and methodological approaches illuminates the applicability of herding to many domains of cognition and suggest that cognitive neuroscience offers a novel approach to its study.

Introduction

Cognitive psychology generally focuses on the individual as the fundamental unit of analysis [1]. Nevertheless, we are all embedded in a complex system of social structures, which ground and organize much of our behaviour [2], ranging from national identity to religious affiliation. Here, we consider one of the many bridges that link agents and the social structures in which they are embedded: a form of convergent social behaviour termed ‘herding’. Herding can be broadly defined as the alignment of thoughts or behaviours of individuals in a group (herd) through local interactions rather than centralized coordination. In other words, the apparent central coordination of the herd is an emergent property of local interactions.

Herding is an influential and well-documented feature of human behaviour in a number of domains, particularly economics and finance 3, 4, 5. Although the current economic turmoil has revealed the depth of herding among financial institutions and individual investors 6, 7 (and by implication the agents responsible for their decisions), this concept also has much broader relevance beyond the economic arena. Examples of phenomena that have been described as involving herd behaviour are diverse and varied, ranging from stock market bubbles and financial speculation to zealotry (e.g. the 2002 Gujarat mob violence [8]), political choice [9] and consumer preferences 10, 11. The concept is well known in ethology, where for example the biologist William Hamilton illustrated how herd behaviour can emerge from the uncoordinated behaviour of individuals engaged in predator avoidance [12]. The process has also been investigated in social psychology and terms such as Fad, Fashion, Mass Hysteria, Bandwagon Effect, Groupthink and Herd Instinct have entered common parlance.

Whereas the concepts behind herd mentality and herd behaviour have a rich history (Table 1), the methods, techniques and approaches currently used to elucidate them are relatively recent. In this article we review the extensive range of theoretical frameworks for describing herding. Similar ideas and explanations have emerged in many fields, albeit with different emphases, demonstrating the interdisciplinary nature of the concept. We propose a framework with which to organize these diverse approaches, which is based on a distinction between the mechanisms of transmission of a particular thought between individuals and the patterns of connections between individuals. We also distinguish between two main types of transmission: automatic contagion and rational deliberation. We suggest that cognitive neuroscience can reveal the mechanisms underlying the transmission of information, which can in turn help elucidate patterns of herd behaviour.

Section snippets

Models of herding

As indicated above, herding among individuals has been studied within a number of diverse domains. As a result, a number of different mechanisms and approaches have emerged across these domains in order to explain herding behaviour. It is therefore important to develop a conceptual framework within which the different approaches and models can be described, one that also permits the highlighting of common features. We propose that understanding how members of a group become aligned by ‘local’

Pattern-based theories/models of herding behaviour: structure sets the herd?

Pattern-based explanations treat individuals as units with certain simple, well-defined properties and modes of interaction (Figure 2, left branch). The terminology used in this class of models, such as ‘critical mass’, ‘self-organized criticality’ and ‘epidemics’, is inspired by models in either particle physics or epidemiology and shares a similar structure. Such models often come under the rubric of econophysics models of herding and are prevalent in finance [15].

Pattern-based approaches

Transmission mechanisms in herding: how do we broadcast?

In contrast to the focus on patterns of interaction, the complementary transmission perspective seeks to unify and identify mechanisms of transfer of information in herding (as illustrated in the split within the right branch of Figure 2) by concentrating on the role of cognitive and affective components, particularly the effortless human capacity known as ‘mentalizing’ (the ability to explain and predict the behaviour of others by attributing to them independent mental states) [33]. A number

What can social neuroscience say?

A point of interaction between these two levels concerns the biological mechanisms that underlie herding. Social neuroscience is ideally positioned to connect these levels. Social structures may be emergent organizations beyond the individual, yet these emergent organizations require biological systems in the individual to create them 66, 67. Furthermore, there is a large body of work on imitation [68]. Mirror neurons (nerve cells that fire when we carry out an action, or watch someone else

Concluding remarks and future directions

The concept of herding has been evoked in many different contexts, ranging from mass hysteria in neurology [56] to the diffusion of innovations in economics and to the propagation of ideas [80]. These appeals to collective behaviour all imply that certain forms of behaviour go beyond the individual, but different disciplines yield somewhat dissimilar accounts of the mechanisms of herding. To discern structure within this array of approaches requires a broad integrative viewpoint. The framework

References (108)

  • G.S. Berns

    Neurobiological Correlates of Social Conformity and Independence During Mental Rotation

    Biol. Psychiatry

    (2005)
  • D. Derks

    The role of emotion in computer-mediated communication: A review

    Comput. Hum. Behav.

    (2008)
  • A.C. Gallup et al.

    Yawning and thermoregulation

    Physiol. & Behav.

    (2008)
  • M. Schürmann

    Yearning to yawn: the neural basis of contagious yawning

    Neuroimage

    (2005)
  • C.D. Frith et al.

    Social Cognition in Humans

    Curr. Biol.

    (2007)
  • J. Waller

    The art of medicine A forgotten plague: making sense of dancing mania

    Lancet

    (2009)
  • G.W. Russell

    Sport riots: A social-psychological review

    Aggression and Violent Behav.

    (2004)
  • A.C. Kay

    Material priming: The influence of mundane physical objects on situational construal and competitive behavioral choice

    Organizational Behav. Hum. Decision Processes

    (2004)
  • C.R. Seger

    Subtle activation of a social categorization triggers group-level emotions

    J. Exp. Soc. Psychol.

    (2009)
  • V. Klucharev

    Reinforcement Learning Signal Predicts Social Conformity

    Neuron

    (2009)
  • B. Wild

    Are emotions contagious? Evoked emotions while viewing emotionally expressive faces: quality, quantity, time course and gender differences

    Psychiatry Res.

    (2001)
  • L. Nummenmaa

    Is emotional contagion special? An fMRI study on neural systems for affective and cognitive empathy

    NeuroImage

    (2008)
  • P.R. Montague

    Hyperscanning: Simultaneous fMRI during linked social interactions

    NeuroImage

    (2002)
  • E. Fehr et al.

    Social neuroeconomics: the neural circuitry of social preferences

    Trends Cogn. Sci.

    (2007)
  • A. Sanfey et al.

    Games in Humans and Non-human Primates: Scanners to Single Units

  • P.J. Richerson et al.

    Gene-Culture Coevolution and the Evolution of Social Institutions

  • R.J. Shiller

    Irrational exuberance

    (2000)
  • R.J. Shiller

    Bubbles, human judgment, and expert opinion

    Fin. Analysts J.

    (2002)
  • R.J. Shiller

    The subprime solution: how today's global financial crisis happened and what to do about it

    (2008)
  • G.A. Akerlof et al.

    Animal spirits: how human psychology drives the economy, and why it matters for global capitalism

    (2009)
  • M. Kumar

    A Journey into the Bleeding City: Following the Footprints of the Rubble of Riot and Violence of Earthquake in Gujarat, India

    Psychol. Dev. Soc.

    (2007)
  • M.J. Salganik

    Experimental Study of Inequality and Unpredictability in an Artificial Cultural Market

    Science

    (2006)
  • M. Schulte-Ruther

    Mirror neuron and theory of mind mechanisms involved in face-to-face interactions: A functional magnetic resonance imaging approach to empathy

    J. Cogn. Neurosci.

    (2007)
  • F. Van Overwalle

    Social Cognition, and the Brain: A Meta-Analysis

    Hum. Brain Mapping

    (2009)
  • D. Rickles

    Econophysics and Financial Market Complexity

  • M. Buchanan

    The Social Atom: Why the Rich Get Richer, Cheaters Get Caught, and Your Neighbor Usually Looks Like You

    (2007)
  • M. Bartolozzi et al.

    Stochastic cellular automata model for stock market dynamics

    Phys. Rev. e

    (2004)
  • C. Borghesi et al.

    Of songs and men: a model for multiple choice with herding

    Qual. and Quantity

    (2007)
  • D.J.T. Sumpter

    The principles of collective animal behaviour

    Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B –Biol. Sci.

    (2006)
  • I. Couzin

    Collective minds

    Nature

    (2007)
  • J.R.G. Dyer

    Leadership, consensus decision making and collective behaviour in humans

    Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B –Biol. Sci.

    (2009)
  • F. Cucker

    Modeling Language Evolution

    Foundations of Comput. Math.

    (2004)
  • F. Cucker et al.

    On the mathematics of emergence

    Jpn. J. Math.

    (2007)
  • N.A. Christakis et al.

    The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years

    N. Engl. J. Med.

    (2007)
  • J.H. Fowler et al.

    Dynamic spread of happiness in a large social network: longitudinal analysis over 20 years in the Framingham Heart Study

    BMJ

    (2008)
  • V. Schwammle

    Different topologies for a herding model of opinion

    Phys. Rev. e

    (2007)
  • Natalie, S. and Petr, S. (2007) Technology adoption and herding behavior in complex social networks. Working Papers...
  • D.J. Watts

    A twenty-first century science

    Nature

    (2007)
  • Choi, S. et al. (2005) Behavioral Aspects of Learning in Social Networks: An Experimental Study. In Advances in Applied...
  • T. Singer et al.

    The neuroeconomics of mind reading and empathy

    Am. Econ. Rev.

    (2005)
  • Cited by (374)

    • Simple model of market share dynamics based on clients’ firm-switching decisions

      2024, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
    • Bayesian herd detection for dynamic data

      2024, International Journal of Forecasting
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text