Elsevier

Social Science Research

Volume 50, March 2015, Pages 100-109
Social Science Research

Neighbourhood effects on educational attainment of adolescents, buffered by personality and educational commitment

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.11.011Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We examine differential susceptibility to neighbourhood effects on education.

  • Neighbourhood effects on education vary with the personality type of adolescents.

  • Neighbourhood effects are strong among both undercontrollers and overcontrollers and weak/absent among resilient youth.

  • Strong educational commitment buffers neighbourhood effects on attainment.

  • Small areas yield stronger effects on educational outcomes than wider neighbourhoods.

Abstract

Research has repeatedly shown that neighbourhood disadvantage negatively influences individual educational outcomes. However, the great variation in outcomes indicates substantial unobserved heterogeneity. Looking at the rates of obtaining a basic educational qualification, the hypothesis is that individual traits of adolescents can buffer neighbourhood effects. First, adolescents with a more resilient personality may be better able to cope with neighbourhood adversity. And second, educational commitments might buffer adolescents from negative neighbourhood influences. These hypotheses are tested employing survival analysis, using six wave panel data, containing information on ten years of adolescents’ lives. The results show that resilients experience no negative influence of neighbourhood disadvantage, while both undercontrollers and overcontrollers do. And, the stronger adolescents’ educational commitments, the less they experience the negative effect of neighbourhood adversity. In sum, neighbourhood effects are found, but not for everybody.

Introduction

Research on how the neighbourhood in which people live influences their social outcomes increased drastically over the past 25 years, and has led to a wide variety of mechanisms that may explain how neighbourhood effects work (Galster, 2011, Van Ham et al., 2011). However, despite this longstanding interest, the literature is still far from conclusive about the workings of the neighbourhood. Neighbourhood disadvantage has often been linked to individual educational outcomes, with mixed evidence, some finding large or small effects, while others are not able to establish any evidence for the influence of neighbourhoods on educational outcomes (for reviews, see: Dietz, 2002, Jencks and Mayer, 1990, Johnson, 2010, Leventhal and Brooks-Gunn, 2000). This variation in findings points at unmeasured individual characteristics. Heterogeneity of neighbourhood effects has for example been shown for individual characteristics such as being a parent or not, and being in part-time vs. full-time employment (Galster et al., 2010). Another example of characteristics that are commonly used to address diverging neighbourhood effects for different individuals pertains to the family context and the parents. Parenting strategies or parental stress have in some instances been indicated as a pathway between neighbourhood disadvantage and child outcomes (for a review, see: Galster, 2011), although this relation is not found consistently (Nieuwenhuis et al., 2013).

We, however, suggest two commonly unmeasured attributes that pertain more to the individual adolescent, which may lead to different findings in neighbourhood effects research: a resilient personality type and educational commitments. First, people with more resilient personalities might differ substantially in their ability to cope with adverse neighbourhood effects, and second, adolescents might be buffered from negative neighbourhood effects by higher levels of educational commitment. Resilience and educational commitment may explain why some research finds a neighbourhood effect, while others are not able to find significant links.

A second reason for the variation in the findings of neighbourhood effects is the definition of the neighbourhood. Some studies use the district level to measure effects, others take the analyses down to the level of streets or blocks. Smaller delineations are likely to better represent the individually perceived neighbourhood, and might better when a local socialisation mechanism is in effect. However, a larger delineation may be more suitable when the neighbourhood effect is caused by outside stigmatisation and reputation (Kwan, 2012, Oberwittler and Wikström, 2009). We will test which of the two is more apt in identifying neighbourhood effects on educational outcomes.

Section snippets

Theories and hypotheses

We consider two individual attributes that we hypothesise to interact with the neighbourhood effect: personality types and educational commitment. Our specific educational outcome is ‘the timing of obtaining a basic qualification’. This outcome enables us to develop hypotheses about study delay and school dropout. In the following we will first briefly discuss the neighbourhood effects literature on education, and subsequently we will hypothesise why personality type and educational commitment

Data

To test our hypotheses we use several data sources. The six waves of the Conflict and Management of Relationships (Conamore) data are used for individual-level data. For neighbourhood-level information we use data from The Netherlands Institute for Social Research and Statistics Netherlands. The Conamore data are a longitudinal dataset consisting of 1,313 respondents divided into an early-to-middle adolescent cohort (n = 923; 70.3%) who were on average 12.4 years of age at the first wave, and a

Results

To test whether there are differences in individual educational attainment between neighbourhoods with different degrees of disadvantage, we perform a simple log-rank test of equality for survivor functions. We divided neighbourhoods in two groups according to their degree of disadvantage (less than or equal to the mean level of disadvantage, and more than the mean level of disadvantage). This test supports the idea that adolescents in disadvantaged neighbourhoods have less educational success

Conclusion and discussion

The principal aim of this paper was to investigate whether adolescents with different individual traits experience different neighbourhood effects. The main neighbourhood effect we found is that: adolescents residing in disadvantaged neighbourhoods are more likely to need a longer time to obtain a basic qualification than adolescents residing in more advantaged neighbourhoods (H1). Although this finding is not novel, it allows us to test our hypotheses about diverging neighbourhood effects for

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Jeroen Weesie, Maarten van Ham and Rongqin Yu for their help and useful suggestions. Also, we would like to thank the two referees, who provided us with helpful comments.

References (60)

  • J.B. Asendorpf et al.

    Carving personality description at its joints: confirmation of three replicable personality prototypes for both children and adults

    Eur. J. Pers.

    (2001)
  • N.M. Astone et al.

    Family structure, parental practices and high school completion

    Am. Sociol. Rev.

    (1991)
  • J.H. Block et al.

    The role of ego-control and ego-resiliency in the organization of behavior

  • A. Caspi

    Personality development across the life course

  • A. Caspi et al.

    Personality development: stability and change

    Annu. Rev. Psychol.

    (2005)
  • CBS

    Kerncijfers Postcodegebieden, 2004 (Key figures for postcode areas, 2004)

    (2006)
  • CBS

    Kerncijfers Postcodegebieden, 2008–2010 (Key figures for postcode areas, 2008–2010)

    (2011)
  • CBS, 2012. Startkwalificatie (onderwijs) (Basic qualification (education)). From Statistics Netherlands Website,...
  • R.M. Clark

    Family Life and School Achievement. Why Poor Black Children Succeed or Fail

    (1983)
  • J.S. Coleman

    Social capital in the creation of human capital

    Am. J. Sociol.

    (1988)
  • J.F. Edens et al.

    The self-systems of aggressive children: a cluster-analytic investigation

    J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry

    (1999)
  • E.H. Erikson

    Childhood and Society (Repr. ed.)

    (1972)
  • W. Furman et al.

    Children’s perceptions of the personal relationship in their social networks

    Dev. Psychol.

    (1985)
  • G. Galster

    On the nature of neighbourhood

    Urban Stud.

    (2001)
  • G. Galster

    Should policy makers strive for neighbourhood social mix? An analysis of the Western European evidence base

    Hous. Stud.

    (2007)
  • G.C. Galster

    Quantifying the effect of neighbourhood on individuals: challenges, alternative approaches, and promising directions

    Schmoll. Jahrbuch

    (2008)
  • G.C. Galster

    The mechanism(s) of neighbourhood effects: theory, evidence, and policy implications

  • G. Galster et al.

    Who is affected by neighbourhood income mix? Gender, age, family, employment and income differences

    Urban Stud.

    (2010)
  • J.R.M. Gerris et al.

    Parents, Adolescents and Young Adults in Dutch Families: A Longitudinal Study

    (1998)
  • C.L. Gibson

    An investigation of neighborhood disadvantage, low self-control, and violent victimization among youth

    Youth Violence Juv. J.

    (2012)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text