Elsevier

Social Science Research

Volume 47, September 2014, Pages 1-15
Social Science Research

Social mobility in the context of fathering: The intergenerational link in parenting among co-resident fathers

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.03.008Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Examines if perceptions of fathering received influences men’s own parenting.

  • Finds a nonlinear relationship between fathering received and men’s assessments.

  • Men with warm fathers have less stress and report being good fathers themselves.

  • Those with harshest fathers have lower stress and positive paternal assessments.

  • Perceptions of fathering received are also linked to men’s paternal engagement.

Abstract

Intergenerational transmissions extend across a number of family-related behaviors, including marriage timing, fertility, and divorce. Surprisingly, few studies investigate the link between the fathering men experience and the fathering they ultimately engage in. I use data on the grandfathers and fathers of the 2001 U.S. birth cohort – measured in the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study (N = 4050) – to test whether men’s perception of the parenting they received influences their subsequent paternal self-assessments and behaviors. I find a nonlinear association between experiencing warm fathering and men’s self-assessed parenting quality and stress. Men with particularly warm fathers are more likely to report being good fathers themselves. Those who report having the harshest fathers also exhibit better paternal self-perceptions and lower stress. Perceptions of paternal warmth show similar associations with men’s fathering engagement. This research sheds light on the significance of family dynamics and how a legacy of fathering may contribute to inequality.

Introduction

The transfer of skills and socioeconomic resources from parents to children is a significant contributor to intergenerational inequality in the United States (Tomes, 1981). While parenting practices are a key mechanism by which these assets are transmitted across generations, the transmission of parenting itself is an important aspect of intergenerational stratification (Kerr et al., 2009, Simons et al., 1991). For instance, parent–child similarities in harsh parenting expose offspring to a greater risk for developing externalizing behavior problems and lower levels of well-being (McKee et al., 2007). Such patterns indicate that some families reap benefits from multiple generations of effective childrearing patterns, while others remain in a cycle of disadvantage due, in part, to the transmission of harsh parenting practices.

Over the past 30 years, cultural beliefs of childrearing have shifted such that men are expected to be involved in their children’s lives (Carlson, 2006). Given that fathers play a central role in child development (Marsiglio et al., 2000), it is essential to ask if men obtain their parenting skills from their fathers. An emerging body of work examines the transmission of parenting between fathers and their adult sons (e.g. Gaunt and Bassi, 2012, Hofferth et al., 2012). However, many of these studies overlook systematic differences in the strength of the transmission process by assuming the relationship between fathering received and fathering given is linear. I argue that we must move beyond this basic characterization to also consider the possibility of reworking, which can be viewed as a form of upward mobility in parenting. In this context, reworking indicates that men practice warmer, more involved fathering in spite of receiving harsh or distant parenting, such as severe physical punishment. I link a long line of stratification research that emphasizes social mobility (Breen and Jonsson, 2005, Solon, 1992) to parenting theories (e.g. Masciadrelli et al., 2006) to shed light on the ways men nurture the next generation.

To fully capture the fatherhood experience, I ask if men’s perception of the fathering they received as children is associated with their existing paternal self-assessments and behaviors. A descriptive analysis of this kind is valuable for a number of reasons. Although research indicates short-term benefits of a strong father–child relationship, such as academic success and fewer problem behaviors (Bronte-Tinkew et al., 2006, Carlson, 2006), the long-term effects—including the parenting styles children adopt when they adults—are less understood. If men do not acquire the skills or behaviors that promote healthy family dynamics, disparities in human capital acquisition and socioemotional well-being may span across generations.

I draw on nationally-representative survey data containing two generations of men, grandfathers and resident fathers of the 2001 birth cohort, to test the following: First, is there a link between men’s perceptions of the fathering they received and their self-assessed parenting ability? If so, does this relationship suggest a simple transmission process or is there systematic mobility across generations? I also consider whether men who do not identify ever having a father figure have more or less favorable paternal self-assessments than men who had a father figure while growing up. The inclusion of these men facilitates a more complete understanding of how one’s parenting is formed in the absence of a father figure. Due to concerns that the link between perceptions of fathering practices and men’s self-assessments may reflect other forms of intergenerational capital transmission, such as socioeconomic status or health, I control for these indicators in my analysis. Finally, I consider whether these correlations translate to men’s engagement with their children, measured by verbal stimulation, physical play, and caregiving.

Section snippets

Parenting across generations

A well-developed line of social science research documents how capital, beliefs, and behaviors are transferred from one generation to the next. Parents and their adult children exhibit marked similarities in divorce, marital aggression, and fertility behaviors (e.g. Amato, 1996, Barber, 2001). Abuse and harsh parenting are also transmitted across generations, where parents who repeatedly experienced harsh parenting as a child are likely to use a similar form of parenting on their offspring (

Data

Data for this study come from the nationally representative Early Childhood Longitudinal Study-Birth Cohort (ECLS-B). The survey contains data on two generations of men – the grandfathers and fathers of the 2001 U.S. birth cohort. Both resident and non-resident fathers complete a self-administered questionnaire at each wave of data collection; the self-administered aspect is particularly important in reducing social desirability bias and item nonresponse (Tourangeau and Yan, 2007). Topics

Descriptive statistics

Table 1 contains selected descriptive statistics of the measures of interest and covariates. We see that 77% of co-resident men self-assess as very good or above average fathers. The average level of perceived warmth is around 19 (SD = 4.13), with a range of 6–24. Approximately 9% of men report not having a father or father figure while growing up. Measures of paternal stress and the three indicators of paternal engagement (verbal stimulation, caregiving, and physical play) are standardized to

Discussion

In an effort to better understand the origins of paternal perceptions and behaviors, there have been attempts to explore the transmission of fathering across generations (e.g. Gaunt and Bassi, 2012, Hofferth et al., 2012). Although such studies contribute to our understanding of family processes and parenting, scholars have generally overlooked systematic differences in the strength of the father–son correlation in parenting; the relationship between fathering received and fathering given is

Acknowledgments

This research was carried out using the facilities of the Center for Demography and Ecology at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, and was supported by a Ford Foundation Predoctoral Fellowship (#CHK-7020411). The author is extremely grateful to the anonymous reviewers at Social Science Research for their fruitful and directive comments. The author would also like to acknowledge Marcia Carlson, Jeremy Fiel, David Kaplan, Jenna Nobles, and Christine Schwartz for advice and comments. The opinions

References (79)

  • L.G. Anthony et al.

    The relationships between parenting stress, parenting behaviour and preschoolers’ social competence and behaviour problems in the classroom

    Infant Child Dev.

    (2005)
  • D. Baumrind

    Parental disciplinary patterns and social competence in children

    Youth Soc.

    (1978)
  • D. Baumrind

    The influence of parenting style on adolescent competence and substance use

    J. Early Adolesc.

    (1991)
  • J. Belsky

    The determinants of parenting: a process model

    Child Dev.

    (1984)
  • J. Belsky et al.

    Intergenerational transmission of warm-sensitive-stimulating parenting: a prospective study of mothers and fathers of 3-year-olds

    Child Dev.

    (2005)
  • P.M. Blau et al.

    The American Occupational Structure

    (1967)
  • R. Breen et al.

    Inequality of opportunity in comparative perspective: recent research on educational attainment and social mobility

    Annu. Rev. Sociol.

    (2005)
  • J. Bronte-Tinkew et al.

    Involvement among resident fathers and links to infant cognitive outcomes

    J. Fam. Issues

    (2008)
  • J. Bronte-Tinkew et al.

    Aggravation and stress in parenting: associations with coparenting and father engagement among resident fathers

    J. Fam. Issues

    (2010)
  • N.J. Cabrera et al.

    Mexican American mothers and fathers’ prenatal attitudes and father prenatal involvement: links to mother–infant interaction and father engagement

    Sex Roles

    (2009)
  • N.J. Cabrera et al.

    Fatherhood in the twenty-first century

    Child Dev.

    (2000)
  • M.J. Carlson

    Family structure, father involvement, and adolescent behavioral outcomes

    J. Marriage Fam.

    (2006)
  • L. Chang et al.

    Harsh parenting in relation to child emotion regulation and aggression

    J. Fam. Psychol.

    (2003)
  • Z. Chen et al.

    Intergenerational transmission of constructive parenting

    J. Marriage Fam.

    (2001)
  • S. Coltrane

    Family Man: Fatherhood, Housework, and Gender Equity

    (1996)
  • E.C. Cooksey et al.

    Spending time with his kids: effects of family structure on fathers’ and children’s lives

    J. Marriage Fam.

    (1996)
  • C.E. Cooper et al.

    Family structure transitions and maternal parenting stress

    J. Marriage Fam.

    (2009)
  • C. Cowan et al.
  • K.A. Crnic et al.

    Cumulative parenting stress across the preschool period: relations to maternal parenting and child behaviour at age 5

    Infant Child Dev.

    (2005)
  • K.A. Crnic et al.

    Minor parenting stresses with young children

    Child Dev.

    (1990)
  • P.T. Davies et al.

    Marital conflict and child adjustment: an emotional security hypothesis

    Psychol. Bull.

    (1994)
  • K. Daly

    Reshaping fatherhood: finding the models

    J. Fam. Issues

    (1993)
  • K. Deater-Deckard et al.

    Parenting stress among dual-earner mothers and fathers: are there gender differences?

    J. Fam. Psychol.

    (1996)
  • G. Duncan et al.

    The apple does not fall far from the tree

  • J. Fagan et al.

    Adolescent fathers’ parenting stress, social support, and involvement with infants

    J. Res. Adolesc.

    (2007)
  • D. Feng et al.

    Intergenerational transmission of marital quality and marital instability

    J. Marriage Fam.

    (1999)
  • R. Gaunt et al.

    Modeling and compensatory processes underlying involvement in child care among Kibbutz-reared fathers

    J. Fam. Issues

    (2012)
  • K. Guzzo

    New fathers’ experiences with their own fathers and attitudes toward fathering

    Fathering: J. Theory Res. Pract. Men Fathers

    (2011)
  • K.M. Harris et al.

    Paternal involvement with adolescents in intact families: the influence of fathers over the life course

    Demography

    (1998)
  • View full text