Elsevier

Social Science & Medicine

Volume 74, Issue 3, February 2012, Pages 399-407
Social Science & Medicine

State-level income inequality and family burden of US families raising children with special health care needs

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.10.035Get rights and content

Abstract

Growing evidence supports the hypothesis that income inequality within a nation influences health outcomes net of the effect of any given household’s absolute income. We tested the hypothesis that state-level income inequality in the United States is associated with increased family burden for care and health-related expenditures for low-income families of children with special health care needs. We analyzed the 2005–06 wave of the National Survey of Children with Special Health Care Needs, a probability sample of approximately 750 children with special health care needs in each state and the District of Columbia in the US Our measure of state-level income inequality was the Gini coefficient. Dependent measures of family caregiving burden included whether the parent received help arranging or coordinating the child’s care and whether the parent stopped working due to the child’s health. Dependent measures of family financial burden included absolute burden (spending in past 12 months for child’s health care needs) and relative burden (spending as a proportion of total family income). After controlling for a host of child, family, and state factors, including family income and measures of the severity of a child’s impairments, state-level income inequality has a significant and independent association with family burden related to the health care of their children with special health care needs. Families of children with special health care needs living in states with greater levels of income inequality report higher rates of absolute and relative financial burden.

Highlights

▸ State-level income inequality is associated with financial burden for low-income families of US children with disabilities. ▸ Low-income families living in high-inequality states spend more in absolute terms on their children’s care. ▸ Families living in higher-inequality states are more likely to stop work and receive no help coordinating care than others. ▸ Low-income families in states with unequal income distributions incur greater costs relative to total family earnings. ▸ The relationship between inequality and financial burden is robust, net of child’s functional limitations and family factors.

Introduction

In contrast with other children, US children with special health care needs have elevated health and specialty care requirements due to chronic physical, developmental, behavioral, or emotional conditions (McPherson et al., 1998, Newacheck and Kim, 2005). Elevated needs for care among US children with special health care needs include increased physician and emergency visits, hospitalizations, prescription medications, medical procedures, therapies and ancillary care, compared to other children (Boulet et al., 2009, Chan et al., 2002, Gallaher et al., 2002, Liptak et al., 2006, Newacheck and Halfon, 1998). Thus, care for the population of children with special health care needs is expensive to both their families and to the public health system (Newacheck & Kim, 2005). The public health importance of children with special health care needs is critical, given the high costs associated with their care requirements and recent estimates that the prevalence of special health care needs among US children ranges from 13 to 16% (Newacheck and Kim, 2005, van Dyck et al., 2004).

Social determinants of health are not well understood for the population of children with special health care needs. However, the fact that the prevalence of children with special health care needs varies by race, income, and insurance status in the United States (Newacheck et al., 2008, van Dyck et al., 2004) suggests that more inquiry into the social determinants of health for this vulnerable population of children is warranted. Researchers have documented health care access and utilization disparities based on race, ethnicity, family income, parental education, and insurance status (Inkelas et al., 2007, Porterfield and McBride, 2007, Warfield and Gulley, 2006). In the United States, policy features of states’ public health insurance programs have been found to be associated with the health care access of children with special health care needs (Parish, Shattuck, & Rose, 2009).

Section snippets

Financial burden of caring for children with special health care needs

Families raising children with special health care needs often experience financial burden due to the medical expenditures associated with receiving health care and other related services. Out-of-pocket expenses US families incur for the medical care of their children with special health care needs include copayments and direct expenditures associated with health care services, special foods, durable equipments, and medications (Chen and Newacheck, 2006, Lindley and Mark, 2010, Newacheck and

State-level income inequality and access to health care services

While most of the existing health research has exclusively examined the contributions of family income or family poverty, the income inequality hypothesis has been asserted as a social determinant of health (Kawachi, Kennedy, & Wilkinson, 1999). Contemporary researchers have examined how the distribution of income across communities, states, and nations is associated with health and health care outcomes. Concern about growing income inequality has also received recent attention in the popular

Data sources

Child- and family-level data were drawn from the 2005–06 wave of the US National Survey of Children with Special Health Care Needs, which is publicly available and funded by the Health Resources and Services Administration, Maternal and Child Health Bureau. Data were collected by the National Center for Health Statistics between April 2005 and February 2007. The random-digit dialed telephone survey collected a comprehensive array of information on children with special health care needs,

Results

Table 1 describes the characteristics of the sample of low-income children with special health care needs, and reports the distribution of state-level covariates. The percentage of families in each state reporting each indicator of burden is reported in Table 2, along with each state’s Gini coefficient. The states with the most equal distribution of income are Alaska, Utah and Wisconsin, while New York, Louisiana and the District of Columbia had the least equal distribution of income. There was

Discussion

This research builds on previous investigations of the outcomes associated with inequality at the state level in the United States. The study contributes new evidence that income inequality is associated with the burden low-income families of children with special health care needs face in raising their children. The health care costs incurred by families of children with special health care needs in the United States are high. This research presents the first evidence of an association between

Conclusion

This investigation employed a multilevel modeling approach to examine the relationship between state income inequality and the financial and caregiving burdens low-income families incur from the health care needs of their children with special health care needs. This study contributes new evidence of a consistent relationship between state income inequality and the high level of financial burden these families incur. These findings indicate that state income inequality may well have an

Acknowledgments

Support for this research was provided by the Lurie Institute for Disability Policy, Brandeis University. Ms. Dababnah’s support was provided by a Sam & Betsy Reeves Doctoral Fellowship, UNC School of Social Work.

References (48)

  • A. Deaton

    Health, inequality, and economic development

    Journal of Economic Literature

    (2003)
  • C. DeNavas-Walt et al.

    Income, poverty, and health insurance coverage in the United States: 2004

    (2005)
  • N. Duan et al.

    A comparison of alternative models for the demand for health care

    Journal of Business and Economic Statistics

    (1983)
  • P. van Dyck et al.

    Prevalence and characteristics of children with special health care needs

    Archives of Pediatric & Adolescent Medicine

    (2004)
  • R.H. Frank

    Income inequality: too big to ignore

    The New York Times

    (2010, October 16)
  • M.M. Gallaher et al.

    Health care use by children diagnosed as having developmental delay

    Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine

    (2002)
  • S.K. Gnanasekaran et al.

    State policy environment and delayed or foregone care among children with special health care needs

    Maternal and Child Health Journal

    (2008)
  • M. Huynh et al.

    Contextual effect of income inequality on birth outcomes

    International Journal of Epidemiology

    (2005)
  • P.T. von Hippel

    Regression with missing Ys: an improved strategy for analyzing multiply imputed data

    Sociological Methodology

    (2007)
  • G.A. Kaplan et al.

    Inequality in income and mortality in the United States: analysis of mortality and potential

    BMJ: British Medical Journal

    (1996)
  • B.P. Kennedy et al.

    Income distribution and mortality: cross-sectional ecological study of the Robin Hood index in the United states

    BMJ: British Medical Journal

    (1996)
  • B.P. Kennedy et al.

    Income distribution, socioeconomic status, and self rated health in the United States: multilevel analysis

    BMJ: British Medical Journal

    (1998)
  • N.D. Kristoff

    Equality, a true soul food

    The New York Times

    (2011, January 1)
  • Cited by (24)

    • Parents with intellectual disabilities in the child protection system

      2019, Children and Youth Services Review
      Citation Excerpt :

      Four specific risk factors that are commonly associated with child maltreatment are poverty, mental health and substance use disorder challenges, domestic violence, and level of social supports. Poverty is one of the primary (and best-studied) risk factors for child maltreatment – and it is much more common in populations with disabilities (Batavia & Beaulaurier, 2001; Parish, Rose, Dababnah, Yoo, & Cassiman, 2012). Behavioral health concerns are also primary risk factors for child maltreatment – concerns that may be more prevalent in populations with disabilities.

    • The relationship between raising a child with a disability and the mental health of mothers compared to raising a child without disability in japan

      2016, SSM - Population Health
      Citation Excerpt :

      Raising a child with a disability is an unexpected experience for parents (Raina et al., 2005). Caring for a child with a disability, depending on the type of disability, can result in physical health problems, mental health problems, and time or financial burdens on mothers (Bourke et al., 2008; Brehaut et al., 2004; Estes et al., 2013; Lee, 2013; Montes & Halterman, 2008a, 2008b; Nes et al., 2014; Parish, Rose, Dababnah, Yoo & Cassiman, 2012; Raina et al., 2005). In particular, maternal mental health is important for both mothers and children because poor maternal mental health is related to unfavorable parenting practices (McLennan & Kotelchuck, 2000; Minkovitz et al., 2005), child health problems (Ferro & Speechley, 2009; Schwebel & Brezausek, 2008), and poor school performance (Shen et al., 2016).

    • Youth with disabilities in the United States Child Welfare System

      2016, Children and Youth Services Review
      Citation Excerpt :

      Further, the financial challenges of raising youth with autism (Parish, Thomas, Rose, Kilany & Shattuck, 2012), developmental disabilities (Parish, Rose & Swaine, 2010) multiple youth with disabilities (Ghosh & Parish, 2013) and youth with special health care needs (Parish, Rose, Dababnah, Yoo & Cassiman, 2012) are also noted. Also of note are the challenges to the financial well-being of single working-age mothers of youth with disabilities (Parish, Rose, Swaine, Dababnah & Marya, 2012). Finally, our study results may support existing research about housing insecurity (such as challenges in being able to pay monthly rent) as these challenges are noted among households inclusive of a person with a disability (Parish, Rose, Grinstein-Weiss, Richman, & Andrews, 2008).

    • Correlates of wellness among youth with functional disabilities

      2015, Disability and Health Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      Lower income was associated with lower overall wellness scores and lower scores across two of the four sub-dimensions (emotional and intellectual), albeit the specific FPL percentages varied. This is not surprising given the literature that indicates an association between lower socioeconomic status and lower health-related quality of life,37,38 the documented financial burden of raising youth with special health care needs,39,40 the impact of state-level income inequality on family burden related to the health care of special needs children,41 the difficulty of being able to work full time for parents caring for the special needs of their children,24,42–45 and disproportionately higher rates of unmet mental health needs of youth with special health care needs and their families of lower socioeconomic status.46 As our sample of youth with functional limitations is a subset of youth with special health care needs, we would expect similar findings to the larger group related to income associations.

    • Primary Care for Adolescents with Developmental Disabilities

      2014, Primary Care - Clinics in Office Practice
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although the Affordable Care Act will reduce financial barriers to care for adolescents with disabilities, many families caring for children with disabilities struggle financially.5 Families living in states with higher income inequality have higher family financial burdens for funding the health care of children with special health care needs.6 Programmatic barriers to care include lack of sign language interpreters or print materials available in alternative formats, and inadequate appointment lengths.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text