Job quality and inequality: Parents’ jobs and children’s emotional and behavioural difficulties
Section snippets
The nature of job quality
Our study considers parents’ jobs along an employment continuum ranging from good to bad quality, characterised by combinations of conditions (Grzywacz & Dooley, 2003). Job quality is therefore a broad concept classifying jobs across a range of conditions; following Green (2006, p. 9), we define job quality as those ‘sets of work features which foster the wellbeing of the worker’. According to Green (2006) the dimensions distinguishing good from bad quality jobs are skill, effort, control,
Data and sample
We tested hypotheses with data from the Growing Up in Australia, Longitudinal Study of Australian Children (LSAC). LSAC is a nationally representative study of children, with the main unit of analysis being the study child. Our study used survey data collected in 2004, for children aged between 4 and 5 years and their parents. Mothers and fathers each completed a mail-back questionnaire on their own health and wellbeing, and if employed, their work conditions. Primary caregivers (98% mothers)
Social patterning of job quality
Table 1 presents the proportions of employed parents by job quality category and shows clear gender differences. A third of fathers had good quality jobs, compared with less than a quarter of mothers. A sizable minority of parents (30.9% of mothers and 23.9% of fathers) worked in jobs in the two lower levels of job quality.
T-tests revealed job quality also varied across family type and household income. Lone mothers held inferior quality jobs (M = 2.69, SD = .06) compared to mothers in
Discussion
We investigated whether poor quality jobs pose mental health risks for employed parents and their children. Our study is among the first to test for intergenerational health linkages, finding that when parents’ jobs lacked security, control, flexibility or paid family leave, children aged 4–5 years had more emotional and behavioural difficulties. Further, this association with child wellbeing occurred when mothers or fathers worked in bad jobs, and although modest, shows an effect size
Acknowledgements
This study was funded by an Australian Research Council Discovery Grant DP0774439, and we thank our co-investigators Jan Nicholson, Michael Bittman, Sara Charlesworth and Bryan Rodgers whose ideas are foundational to this paper. Thank you to Emma George and Sharryn Sims for their help with data, editing and methods. We thank all involved in the Growing Up in Australia (LSAC) study. Growing Up in Australia was initiated and funded as part of the Australian Government’s Stronger Families and
References (54)
- et al.
“Good jobs” to “bad jobs”: replicated evidence of an employment continuum from two large surveys
Social Science & Medicine
(2003) - et al.
The relations among depression in fathers, children’s psychopathology, and father-child conflict: a meta-analysis
Clinical Psychology Review
(2004) - et al.
Socio-economic adversity and psychosocial adjustment: a developmental-contextual perspective
Social Science & Medicine
(2003) Changing families
(2003)Family characteristics and transitions, Australia
(2008)- et al.
Consequences associated with work to family conflict: a review and agenda for future research
Journal of Occupational Health Psychology
(2000) - et al.
Daily transmission of tensions between marital dyads and parent-child dyads
Journal of Marriage and the Family
(1999) - et al.
Income distribution in OECD countries: Evidence from Luxembourg income study
(1995) - et al.
The job demands-resources model: state of the art
Journal of Managerial Psychology
(2007) - et al.
The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
(1986)