Individual, familial and community determinants of child physical abuse among high-school students in China

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.03.001Get rights and content

Abstract

While many risk factors for child physical abuse are known, little research exists examining these in multilevel contexts including both individual and environmental influences. The authors examined the roles of individual-, family- and community-level factors such as socioeconomic status (SES) in determining the likelihood of child physical abuse in Guangzhou, China. Twenty-four schools were recruited by stratified random sampling, with 6628 junior high-school students aged 13–16 years participating. Parental child physical abuse experience, together with family and community levels of SES among students were measured and their relationships were investigated by applying univariable, multivariable and multilevel logistic regression models. Univariable, multivariable and multilevel logistic regression models were applied. Six-month prevalence of minor, severe and very severe assaults were 23.2%, 15.1% and 2.8%, respectively. A U-shaped association between family SES and likelihood of severe assaults was identified. In the multilevel model, indicators of low family SES, mother's higher occupational and educational status remained significantly independent predictors of physical abuse. Internal migration status was associated with higher risk as was younger age. The authors suggest that previous categories of risk factors for physical abuse may be too simplistic, and that further research on social and environmental influences may usefully inform intervention programs.

Section snippets

Sample

The study population consisted of students in years 1–3 of junior high school (ages 13–16 years), with schools being used as recruitment sites. The choice of this age group was largely dependent on students' ability to complete the self-administered questionnaire for physical abuse. A list and details of all eligible (192) public schools in Guangzhou was obtained from the Education Bureau – they were then randomised based on the stratified sampling methods described below. Schools were

Results

The absolute number of children reporting minor assaults, severe assaults and very severe assaults in the previous 6 months was 1532 (23.3%), 998 (15.1%) and 184 (2.8%), respectively, while 73.2% of students reported no physical abuse. The variation between schools in reported abuse was greater than the variation between districts. The proportion of students reporting severe or very severe abuse ranged from 12.8% to 19.5% among the 8 districts and from 9.7% to 29.6% among the 24 schools. The

Discussion

This study confirms previous reports that child physical abuse is common in China; 26.8% of respondents reported having been physically assaulted by their parents in the previous 6 months, with 15.1% and 2.8% of them reporting severe and very severe assaults, respectively. Of particular interest was the U-shaped association found between some individual parental SES indicators and occurrence of physical abuse, which was somewhat unexpected given that past research has indicated that the risk of

References (50)

  • P. Sidebotham et al.

    Child abuse in the “Children of the nineties”: deprivation, class and social networks in a UK sample

    Child Abuse & Neglect

    (2002)
  • M.A. Straus et al.

    Identification of child abuse with the Parent–Child Conflict Tactics scales: development and psychometric data for a national sample of American parents

    Child Abuse & Neglect

    (1998)
  • C.S.K. Tang

    Corporal punishment and physical abuse against children: a community study on Chinese parents in Hong Kong

    Child Abuse & Neglect

    (2006)
  • C.S.K. Tang et al.

    Child abuse in Hong Kong revisited after 15 years: characteristics of victims and abusers

    Child Abuse & Neglect

    (1996)
  • All China Women's Foundation

    Facts and figures

  • J. Belsky

    Etiology of child abuse: a development-ecological analysis

    Psychological Bulletin

    (1993)
  • J. Brown et al.

    A longitudinal analysis of risk factors for child abuse: findings of a 17-year prospective study of officially recorded and self-reported child abuse and neglect

    Child Abuse & Neglect

    (1998)
  • Bryk, A. S., Raudenbush, S. W. (1992) Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park:...
  • Carolina Population Centre, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • J.Q. Chen et al.

    Childhood maltreatment experiences: a study in six Chinese provinces

  • A.C. Crouter et al.

    Linking parents' work pressure and adolescents' well-being: insights into dynamics in dual-earner families

    Developmental Psychology

    (1999)
  • M. Farley et al.

    Physical symptoms, posttraumatic stress disorder, and healthcare utilization of women with and without childhood physical and sexual abuse

    Psychological Reports

    (2001)
  • B. Freisthleret et al.

    Understanding the ecology of child maltreatment: a review of the literature and directions for future research

    Child Maltreatment

    (2006)
  • Cited by (60)

    • Prevalence, demographics, and cognitive dysfunction among methamphetamine-dependent individuals with childhood maltreatment

      2022, Journal of Psychiatric Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      The lower rates of emotional abuse and physical neglect, but higher rates of sexual abuse in the METH-DIs, may imply different effects of CM types. A higher prevalence of physical maltreatment and emotional maltreatment are found in people with low adult socioeconomic status and childhood socioeconomic status (Danese et al., 2007; Sara R. Jaffee et al., 2018; Lawson et al., 2017; Wong et al., 2009). In this study, in order to match the education levels of the two groups, only the healthy controls with low education levels, who had relatively low socioeconomic status, was selected.

    • Violent disciplinary behaviors towards left-behind children in 20 counties of rural China

      2020, Children and Youth Services Review
      Citation Excerpt :

      UNICEF suggests that limited parental education is a risk factor for violent discipline, but only in some countries (UNICEF, 2010). Some researchers have observed higher risk of child physical abuse in families with relatively high social standing (high parental education levels and maternal occupation) (Wong, Chen, Goggins, Tang, & Leung, 2009). Other researchers reported that parents’ education level was not a risk factor for physical or emotional maltreatment (Ni & Hesketh, 2020).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text