Cluster analysis of autism spectrum disorder symptomatology: Qualitatively distinct subtypes or quantitative degrees of severity of a single disorder?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2018.03.006Get rights and content

Abstract

The decision to collapse several related disorders into a single diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) generated significant controversy and debate. There has been mixed evidence as to whether various ASD subtypes are qualitatively distinct or if they exist on a spectrum of symptom severity. The present study conducted a two-step cluster analysis of major ASD symptoms in a sample of 147 young males with ASD aged between 6yr and 18yr with IQ > 70. Results indicated that a two-cluster solution (high and low severity of ASD symptomatology) was reliable and valid. Further, the construct of challenging behaviour was not a necessary component of the two-cluster solution, verifying the new conceptualisation of ASD. Further replication of these findings with other subsets of individuals with ASD is needed.

Section snippets

What this paper adds

  • The ongoing clinical debate regarding the appropriate diagnostic classification protocol for Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) reflects confusion in the field. To help clarify this issue, Cluster Analytic techniques were used to form models of the diagnostic criteria for ASD in a sample of 147 young males with ASD. Results verified the recent DSM-5 model, excluding challenging behaviour as a major indicator of ASD. These findings assist in the accurate diagnosis and treatment planning for youth

Participants

In determining the required sample size for CA, two schools of thought exist. First, Formann (1984) recommended specific sample size calculations based on the number of variables (a minimum sample size of 2k, where k is the number of variables) for performing latent class analysis, a related statistical technique, and some researchers have applied this procedure to sample size calculations for CA in the area of autism (McCrimmon, Schwean, Saklofske, Montgomery, & Brady, 2012). Second, Hair,

Data diagnostics

Prior to CA procedures, the data were screened for missing data, normality, the presence of outliers, and independence. The original sample consisted of 150 young males with ASD, but because two-step CA requires complete data on the clustering variables (ASD symptoms, SF, and CB), three cases with missing data were removed, resulting in a final sample size of 147. Data on the clustering variables were normally distributed at the total scale and subscale levels, and thus no data transformations

Implications of findings

The results of the CA in the present study have several implications. First, the CA that included CB as an indicator of ASD symptomatology in combination with core ASD symptoms (social deficits and restricted-repetitive behaviour) and SF (sensory difficulties) failed to successfully replicate, unlike the CA which included only core ASD symptoms and SF as clustering variables. This suggests that CB, which has previously been shown to be a significant associated clinical feature in children with

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from each of the parents who participated in the study, and verbal assent was obtained from their sons.

References (52)

  • APA

    Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders

    (2000)
  • APA

    Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders-5

    (2013)
  • M. Aldenderfer et al.

    Cluster analysis

    (1984)
  • M. Aman et al.

    The Aberrant Behavior Checklist: A behavior ratings scale for the assessment of treatment effects

    American Journal of Mental Deficiency

    (1985)
  • J. Bacher et al.

    SPSS TwoStep cluster: A first evaluation work and discussion paper

    (2004)
  • A. Baker et al.

    The relationship between sensory processing patterns and behavioural responsiveness in Autistic Disorder: A pilot study

    Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders

    (2008)
  • S. Baron-Cohen et al.

    The autism-spectrum quotient (AQ): Evidence from Asperger syndrome/high-functioning autism, males and females, scientists and mathematicians

    Journal of Autism and Developmental Disabilities

    (2001)
  • V. Bitsika et al.

    Variation in the profile of anxiety disorders in boys with an ASD according to method and source of assessment

    Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

    (2014)
  • V. Bitsika et al.

    Differences in the prevalence, severity and symptom profile of depression in boys with an Autism Spectrum Disorder vs normally developing controls

    International Journal of Disability, Development and Education

    (2015)
  • K. Burnham et al.

    Multimodel inference: Understanding AIC and BIC in model selection

    Sociological Methods & Research

    (2004)
  • S. Chakrabarti et al.

    Pervasive developmental disorders in preschool children

    JAMA

    (2001)
  • J. Constantino et al.

    Social responsiveness scale second edition (SRS-2)

    (2012)
  • W. Dunn

    Sensory profile

    (1999)
  • L. Eaves et al.

    Subtypes of autism by cluster analysis

    Journal of Autism and Developmental Disabilities

    (1994)
  • A. Esbensen et al.

    Age-related differences in restricted repetitive behaviors in Autism Spectrum Disorders

    Journal of Autism and Developmental Disabilities

    (2009)
  • A. Formann

    Die latent-class-analyse: Einführung in die theorie und anwendung

    (1984)
  • Cited by (9)

    • From bedside to bench and back: Translating ASD models

      2018, Progress in Brain Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Another study utilized sensory sensitivity to identify four subtypes of ASD (Tomchek et al., 2018). Bitsika and colleagues identified two groups of ASD using multiple behavioral measures for individuals with IQ > 70 (Bitsika et al., 2018). Another behavioral classification study measured ADHD as a comorbid behavioral phenotype compared to severity of ASD (Boxhoorn et al., 2018).

    • Autism Spectrum Disorder Behavioural Profiles: A Cluster Analysis Exploration

      2023, International Journal of Disability, Development and Education
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text