Functional analysis and treatment of problem behavior exhibited by children with fragile X syndrome
Introduction
Fragile X syndrome (FXS) results from an expansion of the cytosine-guanine-guanine (CGG) sequence within the fragile X mental retardation 1 (FMR1) gene and is the leading known genetic cause of heritable intellectual disability. Affecting approximately 1 in 4000 males and 1 in 8000 females (Crawford, Acuña, & Sherman, 2001), males with the disorder typically express more severe deficits and behavior problems than females due to the expansion occurring on the X chromosome (Bailey, Raspa, Olmsted, & Holiday, 2008). In addition to intellectual deficits, FXS is commonly associated with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), with prevalence estimates suggesting between 21 and 60% of individuals with FXS meet ASD diagnostic criteria (Bailey et al., 2008, Hall et al., 2010, Harris et al., 2008, Hatton et al., 2006, Kaufmann et al., 2004). Beyond cognitive impairments and the occurrence of ASD, FXS is associated with delayed language development, speech abnormalities, deficits in adaptive skills, and social abnormalities (Abbeduto, Brady, & Kover, 2007). Behavior problems are another key feature of the FXS phenotype, encompassing attention difficulties, hyperactivity/impulsivity, hyperarousal, social anxiety, stereotypic/repetitive/perseverative behaviors, poor eye contact, and self-injurious behavior (SIB) and aggression (Bailey et al., 2008, Hagerman, 2002, Hatton et al., 2002, Tranfaglia, 2011).
Parents of children with FXS report that SIB and aggression are among the most significant behavioral challenges (Hatton et al., 2000), as they often result in injury to self or others. Characteristic forms of SIB in individuals with FXS include finger/hand biting, head hitting, picking/pulling skin/hair, self-hitting, and self-scratching (Hall et al., 2008, Richards et al., 2012, Symons et al., 2003, Symons et al., 2010). Recent prevalence estimates for SIB in males with FXS range from 39 to 79% (Bailey et al., 2008, Hall et al., 2008, Hessl et al., 2008, Richards et al., 2012, Symons et al., 2010), with many individuals displaying two or more forms (Symons et al., 2003). The relative risk of SIB in FXS is also as much as 2.91 times more than those of other genetic syndromes, specifically Down syndrome (Richards et al., 2012). Further, the prevalence of aggression in males with FXS ranges from 38 to 75% (Powis & Oliver, 2014). Relative to those with FXS only, the significance and severity of behavior problems increases for individuals with co-morbid FXS and ASD (Hernandez et al., 2009, Kaufmann et al., 2004, Symons et al., 2010, Wolff et al., 2012). For the purposes of this paper, the term “problem behavior” will refer to SIB, aggression, and destructive behaviors.
In view of the genetic origin of the disorder, the presence of problem behavior in FXS is often thought to be linked to biological mechanisms (Hall, 2009, Langthorne et al., 2011). For example, research suggests that pain amplification may be reduced in FXS and that this impairment could contribute to the development of SIB (Peebles & Price, 2012). As a result of the focus on biological origins of SIB, the majority of treatment studies have emphasized the use of pharmacological interventions (cf. Hagerman et al., 2009, Hall, 2009). Unfortunately, outcomes vary widely across studies (Erickson et al., 2014, Hall, 2009, Rueda et al., 2009, Valdovinos et al., 2009). In a survey of medication utilization for individuals with FXS, more than one third of parents reported that medication targeting SIB had little or no effect (Bailey et al., 2012).
Research findings have demonstrated that that environmental variables play a role in the maintenance of problem behavior in FXS (Bailey et al., 2008, Hall et al., 2006, Hall et al., 2008, Hessl et al., 2001, Symons et al., 2010, Langthorne and McGill, 2012), autism spectrum disorders (ASD), and a range of other intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) that are both idiopathic and genetically caused. Applied behavior analytic-based approaches to treatment rely on functional analysis (Iwata, Dorsey, Slifer, Bauman, & Richman, 1994a/1982) to identify the environmental variables (antecedents and consequences) that maintain problem behavior (cf. Beavers et al., 2013, Hanley et al., 2003). Commonly identified consequences that reinforce and maintain problem behavior in persons with IDD include provision of adult attention, access to tangible items, and escape from non-preferred tasks (Iwata et al., 1994a, Iwata et al., 1994b); however, a number of other functions for problem behavior have been identified (Lancioni et al., 2012, Schlichenmeyer et al., 2013). Studies reporting on the functional analysis of problem behavior have included sub-populations of IDD such as individuals with ASD (Love et al., 2009, O’Reilly et al., 2010); prenatal drug exposure (Kurtz, Chin, Rush, & Dixon, 2008); and genetic disorders such as Angelman (Strachan et al., 2009), Cornelia de Lange (Bay, Mauk, Radcliffe, & Kaplan, 1993), Prader-Willi (Hall, Hustyi, Chui, & Hammond, 2014), Rett (Roane, Piazza, Sgro, Volkert, & Anderson, 2001), Soto (Harding et al., 2001), and Williams syndromes (O’Reilly, Lacey, & Lancioni, 2000).
In its consensus document on clinical practices regarding behavior problems in FXS, the Fragile X Clinical and Research Consortium recommended using functional analysis to identify potential causes for problem behavior (Picker & Sudhalter, 2012). Two recent studies have reported functional analysis outcomes for children recruited for participation in FXS research. Langthorne et al. (2011) conducted functional analyses in home or school settings with eight children (ages 8 to 15 years) with FXS who engaged in SIB, aggression, and destructive behaviors. Each participant's assessment included 3–5, 5-min sessions of each of the following conditions: attention, academic demand, social avoidance, tangible, no interaction, and unstructured play (control condition). Problem behavior was maintained by escape and/or access to tangible items for all participants; none exhibited problem behavior maintained by access to attention. Machalicek et al. (2014) replicated these procedures and findings—reporting outcomes of functional analyses with 12 young boys with FXS. Eight participants exhibited problem behavior maintained by escape from demands and/or escape from social interaction, nine children exhibited tangible-maintained problem behavior, and only three displayed attention-maintained problem behavior. These initial studies are important in that they highlight the presence of SIB, aggression, and destructive behavior in FXS, and provide support for the use of functional analysis in determining the environmental variables that maintain problem behavior. Furthermore, their consistent findings regarding escape and tangible functions for problem behavior suggest that there may be patterns of responding that are more prevalent among individuals with FXS, relative to individuals with IDD. Finally, they identify a gap in the literature with regard to behavioral treatment of problem behavior in individuals with FXS.
There are three decades of research supporting the efficacy of function-based interventions for severe problem behavior (Heyvaert et al., 2012, Kahng et al., 2002), including documented empirically supported treatments such as functional communication (FC) training (Kurtz et al., 2011, Rooker et al., 2013) and noncontingent reinforcement (NCR; Carr et al., 2009, Richman et al., 2015). Despite overwhelming empirical support for the use of applied behavior analysis in assessment and treatment of problem behavior in persons with IDD, there is a paucity of research describing behavioral interventions for SIB, aggression, and other severe behavior problems exhibited by individuals with FXS in particular (e.g., Moskowitz et al., 2011, Moskowitz and Jones, 2015).
In their recent review of the literature, Moskowitz and Jones (2015) identified 31 studies that described behavioral interventions used with individuals with FXS, but reductions in problem behavior were targeted in only 14 of these studies. Furthermore, only six studies reported on behavioral treatments that targeted SIB and/or aggression in a total of nine individuals with FXS. Four of the six studies employed rigorous functional analysis methods. Overall, many of the studies had methodological limitations, including lack of data provided on reliability, treatment fidelity, maintenance, and generalization of treatment effects. Thus, the literature describing rigorous function-based behavior analytic treatment of problem behavior in FXS is comprised of only four studies reporting on a total of seven individuals.
The paucity of research on function-based behavioral interventions for problem behavior in FXS is surprising, given the documented negative impact of problem behavior on children's learning, social behavior, and long-term development, as well as the negative effects on parent stress and family functioning (Erickson et al., 2014, Johnston et al., 2003, Wheeler et al., 2008). Given the success of function-based interventions with other clinical populations (particularly ASD; Doehring, Reichow, Palka, Phillips, & Hagopian, 2014), it is likely that these interventions can benefit children with FXS as well. Furthermore, data on generalization of treatment effects are limited in studies with individuals with IDD in general and in FXS in particular. Therefore, the present study sought to extend the literature on behavioral assessment and treatment of problem behavior in FXS by reporting functional analysis results, outcomes of function-based interventions, and generalization of treatments in nine children with FXS.
Section snippets
Participants and setting
We conducted a search of archival records (1996–2014) of all patients who received behavioral assessment and treatment services in a hospital-based inpatient unit or outpatient clinic for individuals with IDD and severe problem behavior, to identify individuals who met all of the following criteria: (1) had clinical documentation of a FXS diagnosis via genetic testing; (2) participated in at least one functional analysis (FA) to identify functions of problem behavior; and (3) received
Summary of target problem behaviors
As shown in Table 1, all participants exhibited multiple topographies of problem behavior, except Connor who engaged in SIB only. Eight of nine (89%) children engaged in SIB, with all but one child (Noah) exhibiting multiple forms. Hand/object to head hitting (89%), self-biting (56%), head banging (56%), and body hitting/slapping (44%) were the most common forms of SIB. Eight of nine (89%) children exhibited aggression, and six children (67%) exhibited destructive behavior. Specific to
Discussion
To our knowledge, this is the first study to report outcomes of functional analyses, function-based treatments, and generalization of behavioral treatment for severe problem behavior in a sample of children with FXS. Clinically meaningful (i.e., 80% or greater) reductions in problem behavior were achieved with all nine participants. Our findings coupled with those from previous studies provide strong support for the utility of applied behavior analysis methods in the assessment and treatment of
Author note
Patricia F. Kurtz, Neurobehavioral Unit, Kennedy Krieger Institute; Michelle D. Chin, Neurobehavioral Unit, Kennedy Krieger Institute; Ashley N. Robinson, Neurobehavioral Unit, Kennedy Krieger Institute; Julia T. O’Connor, Neurobehavioral Unit, Kennedy Krieger Institute; and Louis P. Hagopian, Neurobehavioral Unit, Kennedy Krieger Institute.
Kyle's assessment and treatment data were adapted from “A Mand Analysis and Levels Treatment in an Outpatient Clinic,” by J. T. O’Connor, R. J.
References (96)
- et al.
Noncontingent reinforcement is an empirically supported treatment for problem behavior exhibited by individuals with developmental disabilities
Research in Developmental Disabilities
(2009) - et al.
FMR1 and the fragile X syndrome: Human genome epidemiology review
Genetics in Medicine
(2001) - et al.
Cognitive-behavioral treatment for specific phobias with a child demonstrating severe problem behavior and developmental delays
Research in Developmental Disabilities
(2007) - et al.
Behavioral approaches to managing severe problem behaviors in children with autism spectrum and related developmental disorders: A descriptive analysis
Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America
(2014) - et al.
Empirically derived consequences: A data-based method for prescribing treatments for destructive behavior
Research in Developmental Disabilities
(1994) - et al.
The development and application of individualized levels systems for the treatment of severe problem behavior
Behavior Therapy
(2002) - et al.
Experimental functional analysis of severe skin-picking behavior in Prader–Willi syndrome
Research in Developmental Disabilities
(2014) - et al.
Autism in fragile X syndrome: A category mistake?
Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
(2010) - et al.
A multilevel meta-analysis of single-case and small-n research on interventions for reducing challenging behavior in persons with intellectual disabilities
Research in Developmental Disabilities
(2012) - et al.
Analysis of heart rate and self-injury with and without restraint in an individual with autism
Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders
(2011)
An analysis of functional communication training as an empirically supported treatment for problem behavior displayed by individuals with intellectual disabilities
Research in Developmental Disabilities
Treatment of challenging behavior exhibited by children with prenatal drug exposure
Research in Developmental Disabilities
A quantitative examination of punishment research
Research in Developmental Disabilities
A systematic review and evaluation of response redirection as a treatment for challenging behavior in individuals with developmental disabilities
Research in Developmental Disabilities
Examining the operant function of challenging behavior in young males with fragile X syndrome: A summary of 12 cases
Research in Developmental Disabilities
Uncovering the evidence for behavioral interventions with individuals with fragile X syndrome: A systematic review
Research in Developmental Disabilities
Functional analysis of challenging behavior in children with autism spectrum disorders: A summary of 10 cases
Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders
The prevalence of aggression in genetic syndromes: A review
Research in Developmental Disabilities
Experimental functional analysis of aggression in children with Angelman syndrome
Research in Developmental Disabilities
Psychiatric symptoms in boys with fragile X syndrome: A comparison with nonsyndromic autism spectrum disorder
Research in Developmental Disabilities
The concept of automatic reinforcement: Implications for behavioral research in developmental disabilities
Research in Developmental Disabilities
Evidence of a distinct behavioral phenotype in young boys with fragile X syndrome and autism
Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
Language development and fragile X syndrome: Profiles, syndrome-specificity, and within-syndrome differences
Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews
Medication utilization for targeted symptoms in children and adults with fragile X syndrome: U.S. survey
Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics
Co-occurring conditions associated with FMR1 gene variations: Findings from a national parent survey
American Journal of Medical Genetics, A
On the form and function of severe self-injurious behavior
Behavioral Interventions
Mild Brachmann-de Lange syndrome. Delineation of the clinical phenotype, and characteristic behaviors in a six-year-old boy
American Journal of Medical Genetics
Thirty years of research on the functional analysis of problem behavior
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
Outcome measures for clinical trials in fragile X syndrome
Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics
On the relation of mands and the function of destructive behavior
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
Shyness and sociability
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Do behavioral inattention and hyperactivity exacerbate cognitive difficulties associated with autistic symptoms? Longitudinal profiles in fragile X syndrome
International Journal of Developmental Disabilities
Alterations to functional analysis methodology to clarify the functions of low rate, high intensity problem behavior
Behavior Analysis in Practice
Medication management of fragile X syndrome
Direct and collateral effects of restraints and restraint fading
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
The physical and behavioral phenotype
Advances in the treatment of fragile X syndrome
Pediatrics
Reinforcement schedule thinning following functional communication training: Review and recommendations
Behavior Analysis in Practice
Integrating behavioral and pharmacological interventions for severe problem behavior displayed by children with neurogenetic and developmental disorders
Behavioral assessment and treatment of anxiety in individuals with intellectual disabilities and autism
Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities
Treatments for fragile X syndrome: A closer look at the data
Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews
Social escape behaviors in children with fragile X syndrome
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Examining the relationship between heart rate and problem behavior: A case study of severe skin picking in Prader–Willi syndrome
American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities
Compulsive, self-injurious, and autistic behavior in children and adolescents with fragile X syndrome
American Journal on Mental Retardation
Functional analysis of problem behavior: A review
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
Analysis of response class hierarchies with attention-maintained problem behaviors
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
Autism profiles of males with fragile X syndrome
American Journal on Mental Retardation
Early intervention services for young boys with fragile X syndrome
Journal of Early Intervention
Cited by (33)
Early environmental enrichment for autism spectrum disorder Fmr1 mice models has positive behavioral and molecular effects
2022, Experimental NeurologyCitation Excerpt :Autism diseases begin early during brain neuronal development and show autistic behavioral deficits. Behavioral interventions during the early developmental time window have been proven to have the potential to prevent or mitigate the aberrant symptoms and severe problem behaviors along with ASD (Dawson, 2008; Kurtz et al., 2015; Redcay and Courchesne, 2005; Wallace and Rogers, 2010). Clinical research has underscored the importance of early intervention or stimulation for young children with ASD, demonstrating their vital role in brain plasticity, synaptic function, and establishment and remodeling of neural circuits, especially those circuits implicated in social information processes, and long-term mitigating effects on the symptoms of ASD (Dawson, 2008; Wallace and Rogers, 2010).
Stimulus Avoidance Assessment: A Systematic Literature Review
2024, Perspectives on Behavior SciencePredictors, Parental Views, and Concordance Across Diagnostic Sources of Autism in Male Youth with Fragile X Syndrome: Clinical Best Estimate and Community Diagnoses
2023, Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology