The ex-Gaussian distribution of reaction times in adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
Introduction
Increased intra-individual variability in reaction time (RT) is one of highly consistent abnormalities in ADHD (Castellanos et al., 2005, Kuntsi et al., 2009). Most studies that assumed that RT was distributed in a Gaussian distribution found that RT was typically slower and more variable (represented by larger means and standard deviations) in individuals with ADHD than in controls (Andreou et al., 2007, Castellanos et al., 2005, Epstein et al., 2010). However, recent studies on ex-Gaussian distribution of RT showed that children with ADHD did not respond slower (Geurts et al., 2008, Leth-Steensen et al., 2000), but faster (Hervey et al., 2006) than controls when the contribution of exponential distribution was factored out; nevertheless, children with ADHD still had greater RT variability (Buzy et al., 2009, Vaurio et al., 2009), and a larger amount of abnormally slow RT (Buzy et al., 2009, Epstein et al., 2011b, Leth-Steensen et al., 2000). Some studies suggested that the infrequent slow RT might not be a cautious respose style, but related to lapses in attention to the perfomance instead (Epstein et al., 2011b, Hervey et al., 2006, Leth-Steensen et al., 2000). The psychopathological explanation for the right tail in RT distribution expressed by these ex-Gaussian parameters remains unclear.
The ex-Gaussian distribution is an estimated distribution combining a normal distribution and an exponential distribution (Heathcote, Popiel, & Mewhort, 1991; Luce, 1986). Three parameters are derived from the ex-Gaussian distribution: mu (μ) and sigma (σ), the mean and the standard deviation of the normal distribution, respectively; and tau (τ), a value describing the mean and the standard deviation of the exponential distribution. Analyses of ex-Gaussian distributions have been used to describe the distribution of RT in a variety of neuropsychological tasks (Epstein et al., 2011b), including choice reaction time (Geurts et al., 2008, Leth-Steensen et al., 2000), vigilance tasks (Hervey et al., 2006), Go/No Go (Vaurio et al., 2009), and working memory (Buzy et al., 2009), etc. The most consistent finding is that τ, a more sensitive measure of RT variability, is higher in individuals with ADHD (Buzy et al., 2009, Epstein et al., 2011b, Leth-Steensen et al., 2000); however, the findings of μ and σ, the parameters of a normal distribution have not been consistent. Some studies using working memory (Buzy et al., 2009) and Go/No Go tasks (Vaurio et al., 2009) showed smaller μ and bigger σ in individuals with ADHD than in controls, but other studies using choice RT tasks did not demonstrate a group difference in either parameter (Geurts et al., 2008, Leth-Steensen et al., 2000).
In light of these findings, infrequent slow RT represents important inattentive phenomena in RT responses in ADHD. Leth-Steensen et al. (2000) proposed that the τ effect could represent the dysfunctional regulation of adequate effort allocated to meet task demands, so the fluctuating response would easily appear to be an individual one in the non-optimal energetic state proposed by the cognitive-energetic model. In contrast, Schmiedek, Oberauer, Wilhelm, Suss, & Wittmann (2007) believed that τ was strongly related to working memory capacity and predicted control of attention in the structural equation model; therefore, as the cognitive load of the task increased, the value of τ might disproportionately increase in individuals with ADHD. Hervey et al.’s study (2006) used the Conners’ continuous performance test (CCPT) as the experimental task, and showed that as the inter-stimulus interval (ISI) lengthened, the value of τ increased disproportionately in ADHD. Using different versions of difficulty of the Go/No Go tasks (Vaurio et al., 2009) and working memory tasks (Buzy et al., 2009), other studies did not find that τ had increased significantly with increased task complexity (cognitive load) in ADHD. These results might support the hypothesis that τ is related more to a deficit in effort allocation in non-optimal states for individuals with ADHD, rather than to working memory capacity. The aim of this study was to examine this issue further, using not only event rates (ISI), but also using time-on-task (Block).
From the perspective of the cognitive-energetic model, both ISI and Block would be contextual factors that altered the psychophysiological state by both the level of arousal (defined as a time-locked, phasic, physiological response to input stimuli) and the level of activation (defined as a tonic, voluntary readiness for motor action) (Andreou et al., 2007, Kuntsi et al., 2009, Sergeant, 2005). In order to respond consistently as the state was changed by contextual variables, the effort system needed to mobilize extra energy to compensate for the discrepancy between the actual state and the required state (Sergeant & van der Meere, 1990; Van der Meere, 2002). Studies have shown that, for individuals with ADHD, performance was easily impacted by contextual variables, such as event rate (Andreou et al., 2007, Kuntsi et al., 2009) and time-on-task (Borger et al., 1999), because they had less extra energy to compensate for the non-optimal state. In the present study, all the values of RT in each trial of all the ISI (1, 2, 4 s) and all the block levels (1–2, 3–4, 5–6 Blocks) were used to compute the parameters of an ex-Gaussian distribution. Based on existent research, we hypothesized that individuals with ADHD would have more periods of slower RT than controls, especially if ISI lengthened or the Block number increased. This would be demonstrated by significant interactions between groups (ADHD versus typically developing, TD) and ISI/Blocks in the τ parameter.
Some studies have suggested that periodic slow RT might not be a cautious response style; however, few studies have examined the association between the ex-Gaussian parameters and response errors (errors of commission and omission). Epstein et al. (2010) found that children with ADHD exhibited a greater degree of RT slowing than did controls before and after errors of omission on the CCPT, suggesting that periodic long RT would be associated with the number of omission errors. Other studies suggested that the faster μ in ADHD children was related to an impulsive response style (Hervey et al., 2006), and that μ would have a negative association with the number of commission errors, but not omission errors on the CCPT.
Although the positive skew in RT distribution has been recognized as the most sensitive index to differentiate ADHD from controls by using the τ parameter of ex-Gaussian distribution (Buzy et al., 2009, Epstein et al., 2011b, Leth-Steensen et al., 2000, Vaurio et al., 2009), further investigation is warranted to clarify its psychological rather than mathematical meaning. From the perspective of the cognitive-energetic model, we hypothesized that τ would be directly moderated by energetic levels manipulated by the ISIs and Block effects. We also hypothesized that τ would be positively associated with omission errors, because both indexes implicate similar phenomena in attention lapses (Epstein et al., 2010), and μ would be negatively associated with commission errors, because it might be related to an impulsive response style (Hervey et al., 2006).
Section snippets
Participants
We assessed 195 adolescents (164 boys, 84.10%) with DSM-IV ADHD and 90 TD adolescents (69 boys, 76.70%) without a DSM-IV ADHD diagnosis in childhood and at current psychiatric and neuropsychological assessments. The inclusion criteria included adolescents who were in the age range of 10 to 16, had a full-scale IQ greater than 80, and who and whose parents provided written informed consent and were able to complete all the assessments. Participants who had psychoses, autism spectrum disorders,
Sample description (Supplement Table 1)
There were no significant group differences in age or gender distribution. As expected, adolescents with ADHD had lower Full-scale IQ and more severe symptoms of cognitive problems/inattention and hyperactivity as assessed by the Chinese CPRS-R:S and CTRS-R:S than did TD adolescents. Of the adolescents with ADHD, 117 had been treated with methylphenidate, with a mean duration of treatment of 33.93 months. Ninety-nine (50.8%) adolescents with ADHD also had oppositional defiant disorders and 14
Discussion
The current study was one of few studies using the vigilance task (Epstein et al., 2011b, Hervey et al., 2006) to investigate the variability in RT in its presentation as an ex-Gaussian distribution and to explore the association between the parameters of ex-Gaussian and the attention performance in a large sample of Taiwanese adolescents with and without ADHD. Consistent with previous investigations, we found that adolescents with ADHD made more errors of omission (Epstein et al., 2003) and
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by grants from the National Health Research Institute (NHRI-EX94-9407PC, NHRI-EX95-9407PC, NHRI-EX96-9407PC, NHRI-EX97-9407PC, NHRI-EX98-9407PC, NHRI-EX100-0008PI), and the National Science Council (NSC96-2628-B-002-069-MY3; NSC98-3112-B-002-004), Taiwan.
References (50)
- et al.
Reaction time performance in ADHD: Improvement under fast-incentive condition and familial effects
Psychological Medicine
(2007) Assessing attention: Comparison of response-inhibition and traditional continuous performance tests
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
(2001)Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: Constructing a unifying theory of ADHD
Psychological Bulletin
(1997)- et al.
Heart rate variability and sustained attention in ADHD children
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
(1999) - et al.
Intra-individual variability among children with ADHD on a working memory task: An ex-Gaussian approach
Child Neuropsychology
(2009) - et al.
Varieties of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder-related intra-individual variability
Biological Psychiatry
(2005) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
(1988)Conners’ continuous perpormance test (CPT II) for Windows: Technical guide and software manual north
(2002)- et al.
Continuous performance test performance in a normative epidemiological sample
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
(2003) - et al.
Validity of the factor structure of Conners’ CPT
Journal of Attention Disorders
(2010)
Effects of stimulant medication, incentives, and event rate on reaction time variability in children with ADHD
Neuropsychopharmacology
Assessing medication effects in the MTA study using neuropsychological outcomes
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Relations between continuous performance test performance measures and ADHD behaviors
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
Examining predictors of reaction times in children with ADHD and normal controls
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
Evidence for higher reaction time variability for children with ADHD on a range of cognitive tasks including reward and event rate manipulations
Neuropsychology
Psychiatric comorbidity of adolescents with sleep terrors or sleepwalking: A case-control study
Australian New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
Sleep problems and disorders among adolescents with persistent and subthreshold attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorders
Sleep
Association between early attention-deficit/hyperactivity symptoms and current verbal and visuo-spatial short-term memory
Research in Developmental Disability
A 3-year panel study of mental disorders among adolescents in Taiwan
The American Journal of Psychiatry
Psychiatric and psychosocial predictors of substance use disorders among adolescents: Longitudinal study
The British Journal of Psychiatry
Rapid visual information processing as a cognitive endophenotype of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
Psychological Medicine
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial on once-daily atomoxetine in Taiwanese children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology
Psychopathology and symptom remission at adolescence among children with attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder
Australian New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
Emotional/behavioral problems and functional impairment in clinic- and community-based children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in Taiwan
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
Psychiatric comorbidity among children and adolescents with and without persistent attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder
Australian New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
Cited by (37)
Alterations in attentional processing in youth with misophonia: A phenotypical cross-comparison with anxiety patients
2024, Journal of Affective DisordersNeural substrates underpinning intra-individual variability in children with ADHD: A voxel-based morphometry study
2022, Journal of the Formosan Medical AssociationCitation Excerpt :The ex-Gaussian model is a convolution of a Gaussian (mu, μ, and sigma, σ for the mean and SD of the normal component, respectively), representing fast responses during the task, and an exponential function (tau, τ for the mean of the exponential component), providing information on the extent of the right skew of RT distributions. Increased σ value, the variability of fast response, has been found in children5,6 and adults7 with ADHD. Increased τ value indicates variability caused by extremely slow responses, which is also found in children6,8 and adults7 with ADHD across tasks.
Resting heart rate variability is associated with ex-Gaussian metrics of intra-individual reaction time variability
2018, International Journal of PsychophysiologyImpaired math achievement in patients with acute vestibular neuritis
2017, NeuropsychologiaCitation Excerpt :Results from the numerical and physical number Stroop task were analyzed by means of two separate Bayesian GLMM with an ex-gaussian link function for the response times. We used the ex-gaussian link function since it has repeatedly been shown to yield appropriate fits for response time distributions including Stroop tasks (Gu et al., 2013; Heathcote et al., 1991; Hervey et al., 2006; Palmer et al., 2011; Steinhauser and Hübner, 2009). Fixed effects were estimated for group (patients with PVD vs. healthy controls), numerical distance (1 vs. 2 vs. 5), and congruency (congruent vs. neutral vs. incongruent) and all possible interaction terms.