Review articleStepping Stones Triple P-Positive Parenting Program for children with disability: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Highlights
► Reviewed twelve studies evaluating a parenting program for children with disability. ► Significant moderate effect sizes for reducing reported and observed child problems. ► Significant effect sizes on improving parenting styles, satisfaction/efficacy. ► Significant effect sizes on improving parental adjustment and parental relationship. ► Stepping Stones Triple P is an effective behavioral family intervention.
Introduction
Children with developmental disabilities have been consistently shown to be at increased risk of developing behavioral and emotional problems compared to typically developing children (e.g., Baker, Blacher, Crnic, & Edelbrock, 2002). It has been estimated that children with developmental disabilities are two to three times more likely to show significant behavior problems (Einfeld & Tonge, 1996). Epidemiological surveys indicate that approximately 40–50% of children with intellectual disabilities are prone to develop significant mental health issues (Dekker et al., 2002, Tonge and Einfeld, 2000). When left untreated, problem behaviors in children with disabilities tend to become more severe during childhood and adolescence and often continue into adulthood (Einfeld et al., 2006).
An effective means of targeting child behavioral and emotional problems is through parenting interventions (Dretzke et al., 2005, Olympia et al., 2005). Behavioral family interventions are based on social learning principles and have been shown to be effective across a range of child populations, including children with developmental disabilities (Roberts, Mazzucchelli, Taylor, & Reid, 2003). Hence parenting interventions have become a significant area within the literature on children with developmental disabilities (Matson, Mahan, & LoVullo, 2009). While the primary aim of behavioral family interventions is to reduce level of child behavioral and emotional problems, such interventions also target and have been shown to reduce parenting stress (Singer, Ethridge, & Aldana, 2007). Parenting stress is of particular concern for parents of children with developmental disabilities who consistently report higher levels of stress than parents of typically developing children (Baker et al., 2002, Baker et al., 2003, Baxter et al., 2000). Parenting interventions have also been demonstrated to improve a range of parent and family outcomes including parenting styles, parent satisfaction and confidence in performing the parenting role, and relationships between parents in two-parent households (Barlow et al., 2002, Nowak and Heinrichs, 2008).
One parenting intervention designed specifically for parents of children with disability is the Stepping Stones Triple P-Positive Parenting Program (SSTP; Sanders, Mazzucchelli, & Studman, 2004). SSTP is a parallel version of the Triple P-Positive Parenting Program (Sanders, 2012) for typically developing children that has been shown to be efficacious and effective across four meta-analyses (de Graff et al., 2008a, de Graff et al., 2008b, Nowak and Heinrichs, 2008, Thomas and Zimmer-Gembeck, 2007).
The SSTP system uses a public health approach to parenting in order to promote widespread dissemination of programs and provide the minimally sufficient level of intervention required to meet the needs of each individual family (Mazzucchelli & Sanders, 2011). The SSTP programs vary according to the level of intensity of the intervention, and the mode and context of delivery. There are five levels of intervention: Level 1 is a media and communications strategy; Level 2 is a brief selective intervention, such as one or two large-group seminars; Level 3 is narrow-focus training where brief, tailored interventions are delivered individually to parents; Level 4 includes broad-focus training of 10 sessions delivered through individual, group, or self-directed formats; and Level 5 includes intensive additional modules for families experiencing extra problems (e.g., parental stress or partner conflict). Research studies have provided evidence for the efficacy of a number of versions of SSTP. At least one study has investigated a version of SSTP from each of Levels 2–5 (e.g., Hampel et al., 2010, Plant and Sanders, 2007, Roberts et al., 2006, Sofronoff et al., 2011, Roux et al., 2013, Tellegen and Sanders, 2013).
The objective of this paper was to provide the first systematic review of the current state of research evidence for SSTP, using meta-analytic procedures to synthesize data where appropriate. Studies to be included in this review involved parents of children with disabilities and no restrictions were placed on study design, e.g., randomized controlled trial (RCT), uncontrolled study. The first aim was to evaluate the success of SSTP in effecting change in child problems, such as behavioral or emotional problems. The second aim was to evaluate the impact of SSTP on parenting styles, parenting satisfaction and efficacy, parental adjustment, parental relationships, and observations of child behavior and parenting behavior. The third aim of the review was to conduct moderator analyses to compare treatment effects across the different levels of SSTP interventions. It was hypothesized, based on previous Triple P meta-analyses (de Graff et al., 2008a, de Graff et al., 2008b, Nowak and Heinrichs, 2008, Thomas and Zimmer-Gembeck, 2007) and positive results in individual SSTP evaluation studies (e.g., Plant and Sanders, 2007, Roberts et al., 2006, Sofronoff et al., 2011, Roux et al., 2013, Tellegen and Sanders, 2013, Whittingham et al., 2009), that significant effect sizes would be found for most of the outcome variables. Additionally, it was expected that any differences found across SSTP levels would be such that larger effect sizes would be associated with higher levels of SSTP intervention.
Section snippets
Eligibility criteria
To be included in the review, studies needed to meet the following inclusion criteria:
- (a)
The study reported outcomes from an evaluation of an intervention recognized by the authors of the paper as a form of Stepping Stones Triple P. Note that no limitations were set regarding trial design for including studies.
- (b)
The study was available in English or German.
- (c)
The study reported means, standard deviations and sample sizes either within the publication or upon author contact.
- (d)
The study contributed
Description of studies
The searches yielded a total of 1451 papers and the final set of unique studies after excluding duplicates was 983. After screening papers for relevance according to title and abstract, 342 papers remained that were related to Triple P. After assessing these articles for eligibility, 12 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Papers were excluded if they were not on Stepping Stones Triple P (n = 307), not an evaluation study (n = 19), and did not contain original data (n = 5). See Fig. 1 for
Discussion
This paper forms the first review evaluating the evidence base for SSTP, a behavioral family intervention designed specifically for parents of children with disability. A systematic review using meta-analytic techniques was conducted to evaluate the research across seven different outcome categories. Child problems were the primary outcome of interest and the secondary outcomes were parenting style, parenting satisfaction and efficacy, parental adjustment, parental relationship, child
Conclusion
This systematic review and meta-analysis supported the effectiveness of SSTP interventions for parents of children with disabilities. Moderate effects were found on child behavior across all levels of intervention. Significant effects were found for improving parenting styles, parenting satisfaction and efficacy, parental adjustment, parental relationship, and child observations. No significant effects were found on parent observation data. The review lacked statistical power to find
Disclosure statement
Professor Sanders in the founder and lead author of the Triple P-Positive Parenting Program (“Triple P”). Triple P is owned by the University of Queensland (UQ). UQ, through its technology transfer company Uniquest PTY LTD, has licensed Triple P International to disseminate the program worldwide. Royalties stemming from this dissemination work are paid to Uniquest then distributed between the University, Faculty, School, Parenting and Family Support Centre and contributory authors in accordance
References1 (54)
- et al.
Parent training: A review of methods for children with developmental disabilities
Research in Developmental Disabilities
(2009) - et al.
Preventing behavioural and emotional problems in children who have a developmental disabilty: A public health approach
Research in Developmental Disabilities
(2011) - et al.
Reducing problem behavior during care-giving in families of preschool-aged children with developmental disabilities
Research in Developmental Disabilities
(2007) - et al.
Stepping Stones Triple P seminars for parents of a child with a disability: A randomized controlled trial
Research in Developmental Disabilities
(2011) - et al.
Help when it's needed first: A controlled evaluation of brief, preventive behavioral family intervention in a primary care setting
Behavior Therapy
(2006) - et al.
Behavior problems and parenting stress in families of three-year-old children with and without developmental delays
American Journal on Mental Retardation
(2002) - et al.
Pre-school children with and without developmental delay: Behavior problems and parenting stress over time
Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
(2003) - et al.
Meta analysis of the effectiveness of parenting programmes in improving maternal psychosocial health
British Journal of General Practice
(2002) - et al.
Parental stress attributed to family members with and without disability: A longitudinal study
Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability
(2000) Synthesizing standardized mean-change measures
British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology
(1988)
Meta-analysis in marketing when studies contain multiple measurements
Marketing Letters
Comprehensive meta-analysis version 2
Introduction to meta-analysis
Applied meta-analysis for social science research
Impact of experimental design on effect size: Findings from the research literature on training
Journal of Applied Psychology
The Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS): Normative data and latent structure in a large non-clinical sample
British Journal of Clinical Psychology
Effectiveness of the Triple P Positive Parenting Program on behavioural problems in children: Meta-analysis
Behavior Modification
Effectiveness of the Triple P Positive Parenting Program on parenting: A meta-analysis
Family Relations
Emotional and behavioral problems in children and adolescents with and without intellectual disability
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of parent training/education programmes for the treatment of conduct disorder, including oppositional defiant disorder, in children
Health Technology Assessment
Trim and fill: A simple funnel plot based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis
Biometrics
Psychopathology in young people with intellectual disability
Journal of the American Medical Association
Population prevalence of psychopathology in children and adolescents with intellectual disability: II. Epidemiological findings
Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
Evaluation von Stepping Stones Triple P: Zwischenergebnisse der Stepping-Stones-SPZMulticenterstudie
Klinische Padiatrie
Statistical methods for meta-analysis
Cited by (113)
Parenting support: The added value of an enhanced program on child behavior
2023, Children and Youth Services ReviewPsychological flexibility of parents of children with disabilities: A systematic literature review
2023, Research in Developmental DisabilitiesThe effectiveness of the Stepping Stones Triple P seminars for Korean families of a child with a developmental disability
2022, HeliyonCitation Excerpt :The RCT, with 53 Australian parents of a 2 to 10-year-old child, found that intervention group parents reported significant reductions in the number of child behaviour problems, less frequent use of dysfunctional parenting style, and fewer parental conflicts compared to control group parents (Sofronoff et al., 2011). Ruane and Carr (2019) and Tellegen and Sanders (2013) highlight the need for more research to further evaluate the effectiveness of less intensive levels of SSTP. More international studies have also been advocated in order to draw more robust conclusions about the generalizability of the effectiveness of SSTP to contexts outside Australia (Ruane and Carr, 2019).
Mental health problems in children with intellectual disability
2022, The Lancet Child and Adolescent HealthCitation Excerpt :Choice can reduce challenging behaviour by one standard deviation robustly across settings, tasks, type of choice exercised, age of the person, and type of disability.71 Group parent training for caregivers of children with developmental disabilities (including intellectual disabilities) reduces behavioural problems by about a third of a standard deviation72 with specific manualised and disability-adapted parenting training programmes (eg, Incredible Years and Stepping Stones Triple P)72–74 producing larger reductions in behavioural problems of about half a standard deviation. These treatments also lead to changes in parenting skills and parental confidence to manage their children's behavioural disorders.
Reducing challenging behaviours among children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities in community settings: a systematic review of interventions
2024, International Journal of Developmental Disabilities
- 1
References marked with an asterisk indicate studies included in the meta-analyses.