Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and sensory modulation disorder: A comparison of behavior and physiology

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2011.12.005Get rights and content

Abstract

Children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are impulsive, inattentive and hyperactive, while children with sensory modulation disorder (SMD), one subtype of Sensory Processing Disorder, have difficulty responding adaptively to daily sensory experiences. ADHD and SMD are often difficult to distinguish. To differentiate these disorders in children, clinical ADHD, SMD, and dual diagnoses were assessed. All groups had significantly more sensory, attention, activity, impulsivity, and emotional difficulties than typical children, but with distinct profiles. Inattention was greater in ADHD compared to SMD. Dual diagnoses had more sensory-related behaviors than ADHD and more attentional difficulties than SMD. SMD had more sensory issues, somatic complaints, anxiety/depression, and difficulty adapting than ADHD. SMD had greater physiological/electrodermal reactivity to sensory stimuli than ADHD and typical controls. Parent-report measures identifying sensory, attentional, hyperactive, and impulsive difficulties varied in agreement with clinician's diagnoses. Evidence suggests ADHD and SMD are distinct diagnoses.

Highlights

► Studied children with clinical diagnoses of ADHD, sensory modulation disorder (SMD) and ADHD + SMD. ► ADHD + SMD had more sensory-related behaviors than ADHD and more attentional difficulties than SMD. ► SMD more sensory issues, anxiety/depression, difficulty adapting; less inattention than ADHD. ► SMD had greater electrodermal reactivity to sensory stimuli than ADHD and typical controls. ► Data suggest ADHD and SMD are distinct and proper diagnosis has critical treatment implications.

Introduction

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is an early childhood developmental disorder that has received enormous attention in research. Typical characteristics of ADHD are developmentally inappropriate impulsivity, inattention, and hyperactivity (Barkley and Murphy, 1998, Kaplan et al., 1994). ADHD is a costly and prevalent childhood disorder that affects 3–12% of school-aged children (Froehlich et al., 2007, Schachar, 2000) and accounts for approximately half of all pediatric referrals to mental health services (CDC, 2003, Glicken, 1997, Goldman et al., 1998).

Another early childhood developmental disorder, which has received less attention, is Sensory Processing Disorder (SPD) (Miller, Anzalone, Lane, Cermak, & Osten, 2007). The essential features of SPD are the presence of difficulties in detecting, modulating, interpreting and/or organizing sensory stimuli, which are so severe that it interferes with daily life routines. The presence of sensory symptoms may be as prevalent as ADHD (Ahn et al., 2004, Ben-Sasson et al., 2009a, Gouze et al., 2009). For decades, large numbers of children have been identified as having sensory-based disorders by occupational therapy clinicians and others. Although, wide-spread skepticism exists among many health professionals about SPD and its treatment (e.g., Arendt et al., 1988, Hoehn and Baumeister, 1994, Polatajko et al., 1992, Schaffer, 1984, Vargas and Camilli, 1999), SPD is recognized by both the Diagnostic Manual for Infancy and Early Childhood (Interdisciplinary Council on Developmental and Learning Disorders (ICDL-DMIC), 2005) and the Zero to Three Diagnostic Classification of Mental Health and Developmental Disorders of Infancy and Early Childhood: Revised edition (DC:0-3R; Zero to Three, 2005), both of which focus on subtypes of one classic pattern of SPD called sensory modulation disorder (SMD). The prevalence of sensory symptoms is estimated to be 5–16% in the normal population (Ben-Sasson et al., 2009b, Gouze et al., 2009) and 30–80% in individuals with developmental disabilities (Ahn et al., 2004, Baranek et al., 1997, Ben-Sasson et al., 2009b, Tomchek and Dunn, 2007).

While evidence suggests that neither ADHD nor SPD are homogeneous conditions, some of the behaviors characteristic of ADHD overlap with those observed in SPD. Therefore, one important question is whether ADHD and SPD are distinct disorders, the same disorder or manifest as co-morbid disorders. The current Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV-R, 2000) does not recognize SPD as a separate clinical disorder. However, efforts have been directed toward the inclusion of SPD as a ‘novel diagnosis’ (D. Pine, personal communication). Additionally, there are questions about the validity of the traditional ADHD subtypes (e.g., Widiger & Samuel, 2005).

Three ADHD subtypes are described in the current DSM-IV-R: predominantly inattentive; predominantly hyperactive and impulsive; and combined inattentive and hyperactive/impulsive. ADHD/hyperactive impulsive (ADHD/HI) is characterized by excessive and situationally inappropriate motor activity (Halperin, Matier, Bedi, Sharma, & Newcorn, 1992) and limited inhibitory control of responses (Barkley, 1997, Chelune et al., 1986, Nigg, 2000), whereas ADHD/inattentive (ADHD/I) is characterized by an impaired ability to focus, sustain, and switch attention (Cepeda et al., 2000, Levine et al., 1982, Seidel and Joschko, 1990). Some children have both types of ADHD referred to as ADHD/combined (ADHD/C). Children with all types of ADHD face daily challenges with learning and achieving at school, behaving appropriately at home, and participating fully in their communities due to difficulty controlling impulsive behavior, sustaining attention, and regulating activity levels.

One primary pattern within SPD is sensory modulation disorder (SMD), which is characterized by difficulty regulating and organizing responses to sensory input. SMD includes three subtypes delineated by a recent nosology (Miller, Anzalone, et al., 2007) as well as in two developmental diagnostic manuals for young children (ICDL-DMIC, 2005, Zero to Three, 2005): Sensory-Over-Responsivity (SOR), Sensory-Under-Responsivity (SUR), and Sensory-Seeking/Craving (SS/C). Children with SOR feel sensations too intensely, for a longer duration than is typical and/or may over-respond with atypical behaviors such as temper tantrums, screaming or moving away from stimulation. Often these children try to keep their behaviors under control at school where they are exposed to multisensory input, only to become disregulated when they come home. SUR describes children who respond less to or take longer to respond to input. These children often appear withdrawn or seem to be “in their own world.” They have difficulty listening, following directions, knowing where there body is in space, and initiating movement. SS/C describes children who seek out high intensity or increased duration of sensory stimulation. They have behaviors such as constantly being on the move, falling down or crashing into people or the floor, staring at optical interests for an extended time period, or craving touch so much that they are in everyone else's space and face continually in an effort to gain more sensory information. Identification of SMD/SPD is only made when the resulting behaviors significantly affect a child's daily life (Bar-Shalita et al., 2008, Parham and Johnson-Ecker, 2000).

The overlap of symptoms in children with SMD and ADHD makes it difficult to differentiate the two disorders. For example, children with SMD who are SS/C often have attentional difficulties, poor impulse control, and hyperactivity (Mulligan, 1996, Smith Roley, 2006). Likewise, children with ADHD may have sensory symptoms characteristic of SMD (Ahn et al., 2004). For example, problems with sensory-over-responsivity (Barkley and Murphy, 1998, Lucker et al., 1996), especially in the somatosensory system (Castellanos et al., 1996, Parush et al., 1997, Parush et al., 2007, Reynolds and Lane, 2008, Reynolds and Lane, 2009, Shochat et al., 2009) have frequently been reported in children with ADHD. Additionally, some behavioral descriptors for ADHD and SMD are strikingly similar. SS/C and ADHD/HI both include poor impulse control, inappropriate movement and touch; sensory over-responsivity and ADHD/I both include behaviors such as distractibility and difficulty focusing; and sensory under-responsivity and ADHD/I both include being unaware when spoken to or asked to follow directions.

Although some behavioral characteristics of ADHD and SMD overlap, we hypothesize that the physiological reactions to sensory stimuli differs between children with ADHD and those with SMD. Sympathetic markers of nervous system function, assessed using electrodermal activity (EDA), have been used to characterize “flight or flight” reactions of children with SMD in response to sensory stimuli (McIntosh, Miller, Shyu, & Hagerman, 1999). EDA evaluates the skin's electrical conductance associated with changes in eccrine sweat gland activity in reaction to novel, startling or threatening stimuli, aggressive or defensive feelings (Fowles, 1986), and positive and negative emotional events (Andreassi, 1986). EDA includes measures of arousal (e.g., tonic skin conductance level), and reaction to stimuli (e.g., phasic skin conductance responses). Children with SMD are reported to exhibit large EDA responses to sensory stimuli, suggesting stronger physiological reactivity compared to typically developing children (McIntosh et al., 1999b, Miller et al., 2001).

EDA has also been used to characterize children with ADHD. Early studies suggest that children with ADHD show smaller phasic reactivity to stimuli compared to typically developing children (Rosenthal and Allen, 1978, Spring et al., 1974, Zahn et al., 1975). However, recent research suggests a disagreement remains as to whether the physiological reactivity of children with ADHD is smaller (Mangeot et al., 2001, Shibagaki et al., 1993) or the same (Herpertz et al., 2003) as typically developing children. Likewise, studies differ on whether tonic arousal is lower in ADHD children (Beauchaine et al., 2001, Lawrence et al., 2005, Lazzaro et al., 1999, Shibagaki and Yamanaka, 1990) or similar (Pliszka et al., 1993, Rapoport et al., 1980, Satterfield et al., 1984) to typically developing children. It is likely that variability between studies, especially differences among the ADHD samples contributed to the inconsistent findings.

Thus, the need exists to differentiate ADHD from SMD both behaviorally and physiologically. This study sought to evaluate areas that may discriminate and overlap the two conditions using subjective measures of behavior as well as objective physiological measures of sensory reactivity to a variety of sensory stimuli. A sample of children with documented clinical diagnoses of ADHD, SMD, or a dual diagnosis of both, were evaluated for the presence of sensory sensitivities and for atypical attentional behaviors using parent-report measures. The association between clinician's diagnoses and identification of ADHD, SMD, or both based on results of parent-report measures were also evaluated. Additionally, electrodermal activity measured physiological reactivity to sensory stimuli.

Section snippets

Participants

A total of 176 participants were included in this study: 70 children with SMD, 37 children with ADHD, 12 children with a diagnosis of both SMD and ADHD, and 57 typically developing children. Children were referred to the Sensory Treatment And Research (STAR) Center, which was located at The Children's Hospital of Denver. Based on global clinical impression after extensive clinical observations during standardized tests of sensory and motor skills, extensive clinical observations in an OT gym,

Results

In the sample of typically developing children, gender was approximately evenly distributed (49% female, 51% male). However, all three clinical groups (SMD, ADHD, Dual Referral) had significantly more male children (76% male SMD, 76% male ADHD, and 92% male Dual Referral; X2 = 13.82, p < 0.01).

A majority of participants in the total sample of children (typical, ADHD, SMD, and Dual Referral) were Caucasian (89%). Also represented were African American (3%), Native American (1%), Hispanic (2%), Asian

Discussion

In the current study, children with SMD significantly differed from children with ADHD on measures of sensation, emotion and attention as well as physiological reactivity to a variety of sensory stimuli. Specifically, based on parental report measures, children referred with SMD had more sensory problems, more somatic complaints, were more likely to be withdrawn or anxious/depressed, and had more difficulty adapting, but had fewer attentional difficulties than children referred with ADHD.

Conclusion

The current study provides preliminary results suggesting that ADHD and SMD are separate dimensions and may be different diagnostic categories. Although co-morbidity does exist in some children with SMD and ADHD, individuals with attentional, hyperactive and/or impulsive issues without sensory problems and individuals with the converse appear to be separable. Children with ADHD significantly differed from children with SMD on measures of emotional, attentional, and sensory-related behaviors as

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the many parents and children who so generously volunteered their time to participate in this study. In addition, the authors wish to acknowledge the years of support from the Wallace Research Foundation in our quest for knowledge about Sensory Processing Disorder. This research was partially supported by a training grant from the Developmental Psychobiology Research Group of the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center. A special thanks to Anna Legenkaya and to

References (109)

  • S. Parush et al.

    Somatosensory functions in boys with ADHD and tactile defensiveness

    Physiology & Behavior

    (2007)
  • T.M. Achenbach

    Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist/4-18 and 1991 profile

    (1991)
  • T.M. Achenbach et al.

    Empirically based assessments and taxonomy: Applications to infants and toddlers

  • R.R. Ahn et al.

    Prevalence of parents’ perceptions of sensory processing disorders among kindergarten children

    The American Journal of Occupational Therapy

    (2004)
  • American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Quality Improvement and Subcommittee on Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

    Clinical practice guideline: Diagnosis and evaluation of the child with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder

    Pediatrics

    (2000)
  • J.L. Andreassi

    Electrodermal activity and behavior

  • R.E. Arendt et al.

    Critique of sensory integration theory and its application in mental retardation

    American Journal of Mental Deficiency

    (1988)
  • L.E. Arnold et al.

    National Institute of Mental Health collaborative multimodal treatment study of children with ADHD (the MTA): Design challenges and choices

    Archives of General Psychiatry

    (1997)
  • G.T. Baranek et al.

    Sensory defensiveness in persons with developmental disabilities

    Occupational Therapy Journal of Research

    (1997)
  • R.A. Barkley

    Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: Constructing a unifying theory of ADHD

    Psychological Bulletin

    (1997)
  • R.A. Barkley et al.

    Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: A clinical workbook

    (1998)
  • T. Bar-Shalita et al.

    Sensory modulation disorder: A risk factor for participation in daily life activities

    Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology

    (2008)
  • T.P. Beauchaine et al.

    Disinhibitory psychopathology in male adolescents: Discriminating conduct disorder from attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder through concurrent assessment of multiple autonomic states

    Journal of Abnormal Psychology

    (2001)
  • S. Benner-Davis et al.

    Attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder: Controversies of diagnosis and safety of pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatment

    Current Drug Safety

    (2007)
  • A. Ben-Sasson et al.

    Sensory over-responsivity in elementary school: Prevalence and social-emotional correlates

    Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

    (2009)
  • A. Ben-Sasson et al.

    A meta-analysis of sensory modulation symptoms in individuals with autism spectrum disorders

    Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

    (2009)
  • W. Boucsein

    Electrodermal activity

    (1992)
  • Center for Disease Control

    Mental health in the United States: Prevalence of diagnosis and medication treatment for attention-deficity/hyperactivity disorder-United States

    Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report

    (2003)
  • N.J. Cepeda et al.

    Task switching and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

    Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

    (2000)
  • S.A. Cermak

    Somatodyspraxia

  • B. Chavez et al.

    An update on central nervous system stimulant formulations in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

    The Annals of Pharmacotherapy

    (2009)
  • G.J. Chelune et al.

    Frontal lobe disinhibition in attention deficit disorder

    Child Psychiatry and Human Development

    (1986)
  • W.J. Chen et al.

    Diagnostic accuracy of the Child Behavior Checklist scales for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: A receiver-operating characteristic analysis

    Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

    (1994)
  • M.E. Dawson et al.

    The electrodermal system

  • Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, fourth edition, text revision (DSM-IV-TR)

    (2000)
  • W. Dunn

    The impact of sensory processing abilities on the daily lives of young children and their families: A conceptual model

    Infants and Young Children

    (1997)
  • W. Dunn

    The sensory profile: Examiner's manual

    (1999)
  • M.C. Edwards et al.

    Estimates of the validity and utility of unstructured clinical observations of children in the assessment of ADHD

    Clinical Pediatrics

    (2005)
  • S.N. Elliott et al.

    Review of the Child Behavior Checklist

  • S.V. Faraone et al.

    The worldwide prevalence of ADHD: Is it an American condition?

    World Psychiatry

    (2003)
  • R.L. Findling et al.

    Diagnosing and managing complicated ADHD

    Primary Care Companion to the Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

    (2008)
  • P. Firestone et al.

    Short-term side effects of stimulant medication are increased in preschool children with attention-deficity/hyperactivity disorder: A double-blind placebo-controlled study

    Journal of Child Adolescence and Psychopharmacology

    (1998)
  • D.C. Fowles

    The eccrine system and electrodermal activity

  • T.E. Froehlich et al.

    Prevalence, recognition, and treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in a national sample of US children

    Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine

    (2007)
  • A.D. Glicken

    Attention deficit disorder and the pediatric patient: A review

    Physician Assistant

    (1997)
  • L.S. Goldman et al.

    Diagnosis and treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents

    The Journal of the American Medical Association

    (1998)
  • K.R. Gouze et al.

    Re-examining the epidemiology of sensory regulation dysfunction and comorbid psychopathology

    Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

    (2009)
  • R.J. Hagerman et al.

    Influence of stimulants on electrodermal studies in fragile X syndrome

    Microscopy Research and Technique

    (2002)
  • E.L. Hart et al.

    Criterion validity on informants in the diagnosis of disruptive behavior disorders in children: A preliminary study

    Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

    (1994)
  • C.A. Hartman et al.

    Modeling rater disagreement for ADHD: Are parents or teachers biased?

    Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

    (2007)
  • Cited by (90)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text