Elsevier

Research in Developmental Disabilities

Volume 30, Issue 6, November–December 2009, Pages 1448-1458
Research in Developmental Disabilities

Quality of life in caregivers of children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities: Use of WHOQOL-BREF survey

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2009.07.005Get rights and content

Abstract

The present study based on World Health Organization quality of life (WHOQOL-BREF) scale to examine quality of life of the caregivers caring for their children/adolescents with intellectual disabilities in Taiwan, and the factors contributing to their quality of life. Structured interviews were conducted with 597 caregivers of children/adolescents with intellectual disabilities. The results found that the mean scores in each domain of WHOQOL-BREF of the caregivers as the followings: physical capacity (PC) was 13.71 ± 2.35, psychological well-being (PW) was 12.21 ± 2.55, social relationship (SR) was 12.99 ± 2.43 and environment (EN) was 12.32 ± 2.38. These mean scores were lower than the general population and slight higher than the caregivers of adults with intellectual disabilities in Taiwan. Finally, multiple stepwise regressions were conducted to examine the characteristics of caregiver and children/adolescents with intellectual disabilities will more likely explained the WHOQOL-BREF mean scores. The study found the following three factors: self-perceived health status, household income and stress from insufficient family support were significantly correlated to all four domains in multiple stepwise regression analyses. The results highlights that caregivers of children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities seem to display a lower WHOQOL-BREF mean score than the general population, probably for a combination of stress, health and household income factors. These finding must be taken into account in policy making to provide better and more specific supports and interventions for the caregivers of people with intellectual disabilities.

Introduction

Quality of life (QOL) is the sum of a range of objectively measurable life conditions experienced by an individual which include physical health, personal circumstances, social relationships, functional activities and pursuits, and wider societies and economic influences. Subjective response to such conditions is the domain of personal satisfaction with life (Felce and Perry, 1995, Hsiao and Nixon, 2008, Simon et al., 1995). QOL has emerged as an important outcome of service delivery for individuals with disabilities and their families (Park et al., 2003). Measures of QOL should become part of the standard battery of tools used to assess a people's health and well-being, and to identify aspects of life, physical, psychological, or social, that could be improved with intervention for the caregivers (Donohue, 2002). QOL assessments that are easily administered and which do not impose a great burden on the respondent are needed for use in large epidemiological surveys, clinical settings and clinical trials (Skevington, Lotfy, & O’Connell, 2004).

People with ID who are prevalent in diseases and higher healthcare utilization than the general population (Hsu et al., 2009, Lin et al., 2006, Lin et al., 2007, Lin et al., 2009c) and they need the consistent help from caregivers in their daily livings. Caregivers, whether family members or paid, seem to have a rewarding, but very difficult job (Holt et al., 2004). Many studies (Grant et al., 1998, Todd and Shearn, 1996) found that caregivers of adults with intellectual disabilities (ID) report the existence of pervasive rewards and gratifications, as well as stresses, as part of their caregiving experience. Studies also highlighted the caregivers of people with ID bear higher burden of stress and needed further help than the general population (Lee et al., 2009, Lin et al., 2009a, Lin et al., 2009b). Compared with parents of healthy children, parents in the pervasive developmental disorder group reported impairment in physical activity and social relationships and worse overall perception of their quality of life and health (Mugno, Ruta, D’Arrigo, & Mazzone, 2007). Therefore, the caregiver assessment should enable the caregiver consider her or himself as a person with needs of her own (Williams & Robinson, 2001). The present study based on World Health Organization quality of life (WHOQOL-BREF) scale to examine QOL of the caregivers caring for their children and adolescents with ID in Taiwan, and the factors contributing to their QOL. The WHOQOL-BREF is a 26-item self-administered generic questionnaire, a short version of the WHOQOL—100-scale (Skevington et al., 2004). It emphasizes subjective experiences rather than objective life conditions (Olusina & Ohaeri, 2003).

Section snippets

Method

The present study employed a cross-sectional questionnaire survey, with the entire participants was composed of 1043 main family caregivers of children and adolescents with ID (age 6–18 years) who studying in 3 special schools in Taiwan. The survey materials included an invitational letter, the WHOQOL-BREF (Taiwan version) and a demographic and stress characteristic questionnaire. Originally, the WHOQOL-BREF is a 26-item instrument consisting of four domains: physical capacity (PC, 7 items),

Characteristics of the caregivers and individuals with ID

Table 1 presents the characteristics of the respondents in the sample, 92% were parents of ID individuals and there were more females than males (72.7% vs. 27.3%). Average age was 43.6 ± 8.57 years, their household income mainly less than 60,000 NTD (70%) and most of the respondents was in level IV (47.7%) and V (32.1%) social class (incline to be lower classes). With regards to the characteristics of the children and adolescents with ID, Table 2 shows that 58.3% were boys and 41.7% were girls

Discussions

The main purposes of this study were to investigate the QOL and determine the risk factors for caregivers of children and adolescents with ID. In term of QOL measures among the respondents, we used WHOQOL-BEEF health survey to examine their perception on satisfaction to their living. The WHOQOL-BREF was developed as a short version of the WHOQOL-100 for use in situations where time is restricted, respondent burden must be minimized or fewer details are necessary (Skevington et al., 2004). The

Acknowledgements

This research was financially supported by Bureau of Health Promotion, Ministry of Health, Taiwan (DOH97-HP-1601). We would also like to thank all the caregivers who took part in the study. In addition, the authors want to acknowledge the kindness of professor Kai-Ping Yao, Department of Psychology, National Taiwan University, agreed to use the WHOQOL-BREF-Taiwan version in the study.

References (32)

  • S.C. Yang et al.

    Quality of life and its determinants of hemodialysis patients in Taiwan measured with WHOQOL-BREF(TW)

    American Journal of Kidney Diseases

    (2005)
  • W.T. Chiu et al.

    Use of the WHOQOL-BREF for evaluating persons with traumatic brain injury

    Journal of Neurotrauma

    (2006)
  • Y.C. Chou et al.

    The quality of life of family caregivers of adults with intellectual disabilities in Taiwan

    Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities

    (2007)
  • P.K. Donohue

    Health-related quality of life of preterm children and their caregivers

    Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews

    (2002)
  • E. Emerson et al.

    Levels of psychological distress experienced by family carers of children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities in urban conurbation

    Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities

    (2004)
  • G. Grant et al.

    Rewards and gratifications among family caregivers: Towards a refined model of caring and coping

    Journal of Intellectual Disability Research

    (1998)
  • Cited by (72)

    • Bedouin mothers of young children with developmental disability – Stigma, quality of life and collaboration with professionals

      2021, Research in Developmental Disabilities
      Citation Excerpt :

      It is possible that if mothers receive more information about increase their child, and their participation in the decision-making process, their perception of quality of life, will increase as will their collaboration with the experts. The special needs of children with disabilities are an added burden to family functioning (Lin et al., 2009). The day-to-day care of the child requires physical and mental energy, which endangers parental coping and family adjustment.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text