The relationship between stereotyped movements and self-injurious behavior in children with developmental or sensory disabilities

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2008.06.003Get rights and content

Abstract

We assessed whether the stereotyped movements (SM) that are a defining characteristic of autism are discriminable from those observed in other disorders, and whether stereotyped self-injurious movements, which are excluded as exemplars of SM in DSM-IV, differ from other SM in severity or in kind. We used the Stereotyped and Self-Injurious Movement Interview to assess self-injurious and other SM in children with autism (n = 56), intellectual disability (n = 29), vision impairment (n = 50), or hearing impairment (n = 51) and in typical children (n = 30). Cross-tabulation of scores indicated that self-injurious behavior is rarely performed in the absence of other SM. Reliability analyses indicated that patterns of covariation among SM items differ across groups so that different item sets are necessary to reliably measure SM in each group. Analyses of variance indicated the autism group exceeded one or more other groups in the frequency of 15 SM, the vision impaired group exceeded others on 5 SM, and the hearing impaired group exceeded others on 1 SM. Discriminant function analysis of SM items indicated that although only 66% of participants were accurately classified, it was rare for a child with a different disorder to be misclassified as having autism or visual impairment. We concluded that self-injurious behavior is a more severe form of SM, and there is a distinctive pattern of SM, including self-injurious behavior, that characterizes children with autism.

Section snippets

Participants and procedure

Participants were recruited after this project had been approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of Curtin University of Technology. Participants were 221 children (129 boys, 92 girls) aged 6–13 years (mean = 9.40, S.D. = 1.81) comprising five groups: typical children (n = 30, boys = 14, mean age = 8.75, S.D. = 1.64), children with intellectual disabilities (n = 29, boys = 17, mean age = 10.35, S.D. = 2.02), children with visual impairments (n = 50, boys = 25, mean age = 9.02, S.D. = 1.59), children with hearing

Relationships between scoring methods

We began our analyses by assessing the extent to which the different scoring procedures produce non-redundant information by calculating Pearson correlations between the different scores. The correlations were so strong that the different scoring systems were essentially interchangeable. For stereotyped body movement items, correlations between scoring procedures ranged from r = .88 (between prevalance and duration scores) to r = .95 (between prevalence and repetitiveness scores). For stereotyped

Discussion

Our aims were to assess whether there are distinctive patterns of self-injurious and other SM among persons with autism and other disorders in which SM are common and, within each sample, to assess whether relationships between self-injurious SM and other SM were consistent with self-injurious behavior being regarded as part of the same class of behavior as other SM. The answer to both questions appears to be positive.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by an Australian Postgraduate Award. Thanks to Michelle Turner who generously allowed us to adapt her “Repetitive Behaviours Interview.”

References (39)

  • A.A. Baumeister et al.

    Stereotyped acts

  • A.A. Baumeister et al.

    Self-injurious behaviour

  • G. Berkson

    Repetitive stereotyped behaviours

    The American Journal of Mental Deficiency

    (1983)
  • J.W. Bodfish et al.

    Varieties of repetitive behavior in autism: Comparisons to mental retardation

    Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders

    (2000)
  • J. Briere et al.

    Self-mutilation in clinical and general population samples: Prevalence, correlates, and functions

    American Journal of Orthopsychiatry

    (1998)
  • V. de Lissavoy

    Head banging in early childhood

    The Journal of Pediatrics

    (1961)
  • A. Favazza

    Bodies under siege: Self-mutilation and body modification in culture and psychiatry

    (1996)
  • E. Gal et al.

    Sensory differences and stereotyped movements in children with autism

    Behaviour Change

    (2002)
  • D. Gorman-Smith et al.

    A review of treatment research for self-injurious and stereotyped responding

    Journal of Mental Deficiency Research

    (1985)
  • Cited by (53)

    • Sensory processing in young children with visual impairments: Use and extension of the Sensory Profile

      2022, Research in Developmental Disabilities
      Citation Excerpt :

      When responses are more extreme, then sensory modulation is more likely to interfere with daily activities (Dunn, 2007). Children with VI display behavioral tendencies indicative of difficulties in grading or regulating responses to sensory stimuli, such as hyperresponsiveness to touch or engaging in stereotyped, repetitive behaviors, such as eye pressing, eye rubbing, and body rocking (Fazzi et al., 1999; Gal, Dyck, & Passmore, 2009, 2010; McHugh & Lieberman, 2003; Molloy & Rowe, 2011; Tröster, Brambring, & Beelmann, 1991a). From a functional point of view, these stereotyped, repetitive behaviors can be seen as strategies to maintain an optimal level of arousal and attention to process information (Molloy & Rowe, 2011; Tröster et al., 1991a).

    • Rethinking Stereotypies in Autism

      2021, Seminars in Pediatric Neurology
    • Stereotypic Movement Disorders

      2018, Seminars in Pediatric Neurology
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text