Hyper-responsiveness to touch mediates social dysfunction in adults with autism spectrum disorders
Introduction
Social disability is the central defining feature of autism. However, mechanisms that might account for this disability are poorly understood (Baron-Cohen and Belmonte, 2005, Volkmar, 2011). Despite strong support for cognitive explanations, such as Theory of Mind deficits, the fact remains that social dysfunction in autism is typically present prior to the time at which the earliest precursors of a Theory of Mind emerge (Tager-Flusberg, 2007). This implies that more primitive/fundamental processes may govern social dysfunction in people with autism. In general, research tends to focus on visual and auditory channels as routes for social information. However, there is a growing body of evidence considering touch as a channel of social information (Gallace and Spence, 2010, Morrison et al., 2010).
Touch is known to serve communicative functions among humans, nonhuman primates, and other animals that influence social behaviors, such as cooperation, dominance, and emotional bonding (Dunbar, 2010, Hertenstein et al., 2006b). In humans, people can identify a broad range of distinct emotions from the experience of being touched (Hertenstein, Holmes, McCullough, & Keltner, 2009), as well as accurately decode emotions by merely watching others communicating via touch (Hertenstein, Keltner, App, Bulleit, & Jaskolka, 2006). The connection between emotion and touch is further supported by studies showing that stimulating the forearm with gentle touch activates areas in the brain involved with social emotional processing (Voos, Pelphrey, & Kaiser, 2013). Hence, touch serves an important function in social emotional communication, particularly in the more intimate emotions, such as love and sympathy (App, McIntosh, Reed, & Hertenstein, 2011).
Atypical sensory processing is common among people with autism (Hilton et al., 2007, Horder et al., 2014, Leekam et al., 2007, Lundqvist, 2011) with a prevalence of 70–80% for aberrant responsiveness to touch (Baranek, David, Poe, Stone, & Watson, 2006). Because touch serves such an important role in social emotional communication, it can be hypothesized that aberrant sensitivity to touch will influence social functioning of individuals with ASD. However, apart from autobiographical annotations (e.g., Gerland, 1997, Grandin, 1992), only a few empirical studies have addressed this issue.
Recently, Foss-Feig, Heacock, and Cascio (2012) found a positive relationship between hypo-, but not hyper-responsiveness, to touch and social impairment in primary school children with ASD. In another study, Hilton et al. (2010) compared children with ASD and a group of typically developed children with no medical or school-based diagnoses, and found significant relationships between hyper-responsiveness to touch and social impairment. Although the children with ASD showed more hyper-responsiveness to touch than typically developing children, the relationships between hyper-responsiveness to touch and social impairment were similar in magnitude. Hence, hyper-responsiveness to touch may influence any individual's social ability, but it is more common among those with ASD.
These studies show that aberrant responsiveness to touch is related to social impairment in children with ASD; however, the results are inconsistent with regard to whether social dysfunction is influenced by hyper- or by hypo-responsiveness to touch. Moreover, these studies were based on convenience samples with relatively small sample sizes, which demonstrate the need for large population-based studies. In addition, aberrant sensory responsiveness and social dysfunction are problems among individuals with ASD, and most likely to persist into adulthood (Billstedt, Gillberg, & Gillberg, 2007), hence warranting studies on adults.
In addition to aberrant sensory processing, other core features of ASD such as verbal communication (Matson, Kozlowski, & Matson, 2012) and challenging behaviors (Kearney & Healy, 2011) are related to social dysfunction, where challenging behavior is found to moderate the impact of communication on social functioning in children with ASD (Matson, Hess, & Mahan, 2013).
Articulating hypotheses of measurable processes that intervene (i.e., mediate) between explanatory variables (e.g., presence of ASD) and response variables (e.g., social dysfunction) are important for the development of theories (Preacher & Hayes, 2008). Based on previous reported research, it was hypothesized that the presence of ASD in adults with intellectual disability (ID) impacts social functioning directly and through mediating variables of ASD core symptoms of hyper-responsiveness to touch, verbal communication ability, and stereotypical behavior, as well as challenging behaviors of self-injurious and aggressive/destructive behaviors, as illustrated in Fig. 1.
Section snippets
Participants and procedure
The participants were all individuals 18 years of age or older with administratively defined ID, that is, individuals with ID receiving at least a minimum of service from the local health authorities, living in the county of Örebro, Sweden. Altogether, there were 915 individuals aged between 18 and 87 years, where 143 (90 men and 53 women) with a mean age of 36.3 years (SD = 11.5) had ASD and 772 (414 men and 358 women) with a mean age of 44.9 (SD = 15.0) did not have ASD. The total adult
Descriptive statistics
As shown in Table 1, the ASD group differed from those without ASD in almost all variables. The proportion of men was larger, their mean age was lower, the proportion with mild ID was lower, and the proportion with severe/profound ID was higher. Those with ASD communicated less by speech and more of these subjects were hyper-responsive to touch. Additionally, those with ASD had more stereotyped, self-injurious, and aggressive/destructive behaviors, whereas their social functioning was lower,
Discussion
The major finding of the study was that social dysfunction among adults with ASD was primarily mediated by hyper-responsiveness to touch, followed by impairment of speech, and aggressive/destructive behaviors. More specifically, the results showed that people with ASD were: (i) less likely to have speech, which made them less likely to take initiative during social interaction; (ii) more likely to have aggressive/destructive behaviors, which made them less apt to function well in group
Conclusions
In conclusion, social dysfunction among people with ASD is mediated primarily by hyper-responsiveness to touch, in addition to communication deficits and aggressive/destructive behaviors. The results suggest that the cutaneous sense serves as an important channel for social information and it endorses the initiative to reintroduce sensitivity to sensory stimuli for ASD in the DSM-5. Notably, even in adulthood, the somatosensory system is foundational for social functioning. The result has
Acknowledgments
I would like to express my gratitude to the staff at the Centre for Adult Habilitation in Örebro, especially Marie Fransson, Kimm Nilsson, and Ann-Britt Stigfur, for their commitment in collecting the data. The study was supported by grants from the Örebro County Council Research Committee and the Örebro County Council Psychiatry and Habilitation Episteme Foundation.
References (48)
- et al.
Spontaneous communication in autism spectrum disorder: A review of topographies and interventions
Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders
(2011) The social role of touch in humans and primates: Behavioural function and neurobiological mechanisms
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
(2010)- et al.
Tactile responsiveness patterns and their association with core features in Autism Spectrum Disorders
Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders
(2012) - et al.
The science of interpersonal touch: An overview
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
(2010) - et al.
Relationship between social competence and sensory processing in children with high functioning autism spectrum disorders
Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders
(2007) - et al.
A total population study of challenging behaviour in the county of Hedmark, Norway: Prevalence, and risk markers
Research in Developmental Disabilities
(2006) - et al.
Investigating the relationship between challenging behavior, co-morbid psychopathology and social skills in adults with moderate to severe intellectual disabilities in Ireland
Research in Developmental Disabilities
(2011) Psychometric properties and factor structure of the Behavior Problems Inventory (BPI-01) in a Swedish community population of adults with intellectual disability
Research in Developmental Disabilities
(2011)Prevalence and risk markers of behavior problems among adults with intellectual disabilities: A total population study in Örebro County, Sweden
Research in Developmental Disabilities
(2013)- et al.
Speech deficits in persons with autism: Etiology and symptom presentation
Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders
(2012)