Analysis of three components of affective behavior in children with autism
Section snippets
Participants
The participants were three male children enrolled at a private school for students with autism. All had a diagnosis of autism, from an independent agency. All had been at the school for at least 6 years, during which time they received behavioral intervention. All participants were responsive to their individualized motivational systems (described below); they responded well to instructions and they engaged in minimal stereotypic behavior. At the first baseline session, Andy was 13, Carl was
Results
The implementation of the affect-training program resulted in a systematic increase in appropriate affective responding from baseline to treatment (see Fig. 1, Fig. 3, Fig. 5). This improvement occurred in the three response components, during training and probe trials, and across categories and participants. With respect to generalization from training to probe trials, Andy (Fig. 2) freely generalized from training to probe trials since the beginning of the affect-training program. Carl (Fig. 4
Discussion
The present study demonstrated that systematic increases in affective displays occurred with the successive introduction of treatment across categories. Treatment effects generalized from training trials to probes, when different, nonreinforced affective stimuli were presented. With Carl and Marc, treatment effects generalized when affective stimuli, both training and probe trials, were presented by different therapists. Follow-up sessions demonstrated that performance across most components
Acknowledgements
These data were presented in a symposium at the 33rd annual convention of the Association for Behavior Analysis, May 2007, in San Diego. This research was conducted in partial fulfillment of the doctoral degree in psychology by the first author at The Graduate Center, CUNY. The authors are indebted to the children who participated in this study; to their parents, for their enthusiasm about the results through the course of the study; and to Alison Kogut, Marta Perez, Kimberly Reyes, Jessica
References (28)
- et al.
Increasing the use of empathic statements in the presence of a non-verbal affective stimulus in adolescents with autism
Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders
(2008) - et al.
Agent familiarity and emotional context influence the everyday empathic responding of young children with autism
Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders
(2009) - et al.
Generalized imitation in infants
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
(1988) How to plan for generalization
- et al.
Acoustic profiles in vocal emotion expression
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
(1996) - et al.
Social psychology
(2002) - et al.
Procedures for teaching appropriate gestural communication skills to children with autism
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
(1998) - et al.
Generalized imitation of facial models by children with autism
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
(2007) - et al.
The training and generalization of social interaction skills with autistic youth
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
(1984)
Training and generalization of affective behavior displayed by youth with autism
Modifying the affective behavior of preschoolers with autism using in-vivo or video modeling and reinforcement contingencies
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Training and generalization of affective behavior displayed by youth with autism
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
Expression of the emotions in man
Cited by (8)
Effectiveness of creative arts-based parent training for parents with children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
2021, Arts in PsychotherapyCitation Excerpt :In addition, they felt their children’s professional therapeutic interventions (e.g., applied behavior analysis) often neglected their children’s emotions and emotional development. The program acted for parents as an “added on” feature, providing a foundation for emotional development at home though the understanding of the relationship of (a) facial recognition (Betts, 2003; Martin, 2008); (b) facial expressions and emotions (Grossman et al., 2000; Lindner & Rosen, 2006; Richard et al., 2015); (c) emotional responsivity (Scambler, Hepburn, Rutherford, Wehner, & Roger, 2007); (d) the importance of emotional, motivational responsiveness for development (Kim et al., 2009); and (e) emotional responsivity connected to social relatedness and communication (Daou & Hady, 2016; Daou, 2014; Daou, Vener, & Poulson, 2014; DeQuinzio, Townsend, Sturmey, & Poulson, 2007; Gena, Krantz, McClannahan, & Poulson, 1996; Grossman et al., 2000; Hobson, Ouston, & Lee, 1988; Kahana-Kalman & Goldman, 2008; Klin, Jones, Schultz, Volkmar, & Cohen, 2002; Lindner & Rosen, 2006; Richard et al., 2015; Scambler et al., 2007). The program was a relationship-focused intervention for social-emotional functioning and development (Mahoney & Perales, 2003) using parents as agents, helping children to learn and make inferences about others’ nonverbal affective displays (i.e., emotional states such as facial expressions).
A Systematic Review of Intervention Intensity in Pivotal Response Training and Scripting Research
2023, Review Journal of Autism and Developmental DisordersSpeech prosody interventions for persons with autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review
2020, American Journal of Speech-Language PathologySocial Referencing and Children with Autism
2016, Behavior AnalystTeaching children with autism spectrum disorder to recognize and express emotion: A review of the literature
2016, International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education
- 1
Now at American University of Beirut, Lebanon.