The gender of participants in published research involving people with autism spectrum disorders

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2013.10.010Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We determined the gender of participants in recent studies from four journals.

  • The overall male:female ratio was 4.62; it was 6.07 in treatment studies.

  • Few studies (0.48% of the total) included only females.

  • Males were more common in groups with ASD than in comparison groups.

  • Gender merits attention as an extraneous and an independent variable.

Abstract

Research articles involving participants with an autism spectrum disorder and published from 2010 through 2012 in Autism, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, Journal of Child Psychology and Child Psychiatry, and Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders were examined to determine the reported gender of participants. The overall male:female ratio was 4.62, which is similar to that reported in epidemiological studies, but the ratio was 6.07 in intervention studies. These findings suggesting that males were in a statistical sense over-represented in intervention studies, but not in other kinds of research. Most (82.21%) of these studies included both male and female participants, but direct comparisons of males and females with an autism spectrum disorder are scarce. Few of the articles we examined, 0.49% of the total, involved only female participants. Roughly half of the articles included comparison groups without an autism spectrum disorder. The percentage of male participants in these comparison groups was substantially and significantly lower than the percentage of males in groups with an autism spectrum disorder, which may in some cases constitute a methodological confound. We encourage researchers to carefully consider the gender of participants as both an extraneous variable and as an independent variable in future investigations.

Introduction

In 1943, Kanner described eight boys and three girls who exhibited “autistic disturbances of affective contact.” Since that time, epidemiological studies have confirmed that the condition now known as “autism,” and similar conditions which, with autism, constitute “autism spectrum disorders” (ASD), is more common in boys than in girls (see Fombonne, 2003). Although the reported male:female ratio for ASD varied considerably across studies, ranging from 1.33 (McCarthy, Fitzgerald, & Smith, 1984) to 16 (Wing, Yeates, Brierly, & Gould, 1976) in the 29 studies reviewed by Fombonne, the mean male:female ratio was 4.3, which is similar to the 4.6 value evident in 2008 data reported by the 14 sites comprised by the Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network (Baio, 2012). Although the exact male:female ratio is impossible to specify, there is good reason to believe that autism “is four to five times more common among boys than girls,” as Autism Speaks (2013) points out on its website.

Edwards, Watkins, Lotfizadeh, and Poling (2012) recently reported on the ages of participants with autism in intervention studies published in Autism, Focus on Autism and other Developmental Disabilities, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (JADD), and Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders (RASD) from 2009 through early 2012 and noted in passing that, “of the 1644 participants whose sex was reported, 85.8% were male” (p. 997). This percentage is equivalent to a male:female ratio of about 6, which suggests that males are in a statistical sense over-represented as participants in intervention studies. It is not clear whether males are similarly over-represented in the literature at large. The purpose of this study was to examine all recent published research articles in four prominent autism journals to provide further information on the gender of people with ASD who serve as research participants.

Section snippets

Methods

In determining which journals to evaluate, the PsycINFO data base was searched using “autism” as the sole search term and limiting the search to 2010 through 2012. This strategy located articles involving the full spectrum of autism spectrum disorders (ASDs), not just autism. Therefore, the focus is on participants with ASDs. The four journals with the most relevant articles were Autism, JADD, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (JCPP), and RASD. An online or paper copy of each of these

Results

Our initial search revealed a total of 1407 articles. Of them, 684 articles met our criteria for inclusion. Autism, JADD, JCPP, and RASD were the sources of 62, 277, 26, and 242 articles, respectively. Findings were similar across years and across journals, therefore, only summary data are reported. Seventy-seven, or 11.26%, of the 684 articles failed to report the gender of the participants and were not included in the data analysis. Of the 607 included articles, 82.21% included both male and

Discussion

Edwards et al. (2012) reported that 85.8% of the 1644 people with ASD who participated in recent intervention studies published in Autism, Focus on Autism and other Developmental Disabilities, JADD, and RASD were male. This value represent a male:female ratio of 6:1, which is substantially higher than the mean value of 4.3 obtained by Fombonne (2003) when the results of 29 epidemiological studies were combined and the 4.6 value evident in 2008 data reported by the 14 sites comprised by the

References (11)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (40)

  • Quantitative and Qualitative Sex Modulations in the Brain Anatomy of Autism

    2021, Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
  • Inclusion of racially and ethnically diverse populations in ASD intervention research

    2020, Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders
    Citation Excerpt :

    Furthermore, our study highlights a disparity in participation by sex in ASD intervention research which is slightly higher (6:1) than current ASD prevalence ratios (Baio et al., 2018). This aligns with previous findings indicating males with ASD are overrepresented in ASD intervention research (Watkins, Zimmermann, & Poling, 2014). Although information pertaining to intervention type was collected, interpretations of this data are limited and outside the scope of this review given we did not collect information regarding the suitability of the intervention given participant characteristics.

  • Peer Interactions of School-Aged Girls on the Autism Spectrum: A Scoping Review

    2023, Australasian Journal of Special and Inclusive Education
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text