Elsevier

Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders

Volume 6, Issue 3, July–September 2012, Pages 996-999
Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders

Intervention research to benefit people with autism: How old are the participants?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2011.11.002Get rights and content

Abstract

We determined the reported ages of participants with autism (or autism spectrum disorders) in 146 intervention research studies published recently in four prominent journals. Most participants were between two and eight years of age and only 1.7% of them were 20 or more years of age. These findings suggest that the special needs of older people with autism have generated little interest among researchers, which is arguably an unfortunate oversight.

Highlights

► Nearly 150 articles describing recent intervention research in people with autism were evaluated. ► Most of the participants, 85.8%, were male. ► Most of the participants, 63.1%, were between two and eight years of age. ► Fewer than 2% of the participants were 20 or more years of age. ► These data suggest that the special needs of older people with autism are largely ignored.

Introduction

Kanner (1943) called attention to autism nearly 70 years ago and since that time interest in the condition has increased exponentially. Much of this interest has involved attempts to develop systematic interventions that improve the lives of people diagnosed with the condition, and with the related conditions comprised by the broader diagnostic category of “autism spectrum disorders” (henceforth, “autism” will be used in this broader sense). Autism emerges in childhood and there is good evidence that early intervention is key to maximizing the quality of life of people with autism (e.g., Harris and Handelman, 2000, Lovaas, 1987, Sheinkopf and Siegel, 1998). Corsella (2005) clearly makes this point in a review of the relevant literature, beginning her conclusion thusly: “The available evidence from a variety of programs and studies suggests that early intervention leads to better outcomes” (p. 82). She cautions, however, that “It is important that professionals and parents are informed about the progress they can expect for their child, as well as remain aware that most research does not support a ‘cure’ or ‘recovery’ from autism” (p. 83). That being the case, it is reasonable to assume that many people with autism will have special needs, and hence potentially benefit from therapeutic interventions, throughout their lifespan.

This point was made compellingly by Shattuck et al. (2007). Those authors reported that the specific symptoms of autism and the maladaptive behaviors emitted by people diagnosed with autism changed as people aged, and typically became milder, but most individuals in their sample “remain significantly impaired and dependent on the assistance of others for daily living” (p. 1746). “Therefore,” they wrote, “our findings should give greater impetus to extending interventions and services for this population across the life course” (p. 1746). Taking a different tack, Ganz (2007) estimated the age-specific use and financial costs of nonmedical and medical care of people with autism and noted “although autism is typically thought of as a disorder of childhood, its costs can be felt well into adulthood” (p. 343). Interestingly, he estimated the average per capita cost of behavioral therapies as $32,501, $4033, $3479, and $1235 for the age groups 3–7, 8–12, 13–17, and 18–22 years, respectively, and as $0 for all older age groups. These data suggest that most adults with autism receive no behavioral therapy, even though Shattuck et al.’s findings suggest that many such individuals experience significant behavioral challenges.

Although it is apparent that much of the intervention research involving people with autism involves treatment arranged in childhood, to our knowledge no one has examined the relative number of studies that focus on people with autism in various age groups. The purpose of the present study was to provide such information for a substantial number of recent publications in four prominent autism journals.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

To determine the journals with the highest number of intervention studies, we searched the PsychINFO database using “autism” and “intervention” as the search terms and limiting the search to article titles. This database was used because it includes a large number of journals devoted to autism. To provide a meaningful but manageable sample, we examined articles that appeared in the four journals with the highest number of relevant articles published from 2009 to the present time. Those journals

Results

A total of 1167 articles were published in the four journals during the period we examined. Of them, 148 described an intervention as we defined it. We evaluated a total of 146 of these articles; the other two did not include information about participants’ actual ages. Autism, FADD, JADD, and RASD were the sources of 12, 21, 53, and 60 of the evaluated articles, respectively. The studies described in these articles collectively involved 2144 participants. Of the 1644 participants whose sex was

Discussion

The present data indicate that the vast majority of intervention studies focus on young people with autism. Such research is fully justified given the documented value of early interventions, notably but not exclusively those based on the principles of applied behavior analysis (e.g., Corsella, 2005, Green, 2011, Makrygianni and Reed, 2010, Matson and LoVullo, 2009, Matson and Smith, 2008). Given that even the best early intervention programs do not eliminate all of the significant behavioral

References (23)

  • M.W. Krauss et al.

    Adults with autism living at home or in non-family settings: Positive and negative aspects of residential status

    Journal of Intellectual Disability Research

    (2005)
  • Cited by (35)

    • The gender of participants in published research involving people with autism spectrum disorders

      2014, Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although the exact male:female ratio is impossible to specify, there is good reason to believe that autism “is four to five times more common among boys than girls,” as Autism Speaks (2013) points out on its website. Edwards, Watkins, Lotfizadeh, and Poling (2012) recently reported on the ages of participants with autism in intervention studies published in Autism, Focus on Autism and other Developmental Disabilities, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (JADD), and Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders (RASD) from 2009 through early 2012 and noted in passing that, “of the 1644 participants whose sex was reported, 85.8% were male” (p. 997). This percentage is equivalent to a male:female ratio of about 6, which suggests that males are in a statistical sense over-represented as participants in intervention studies.

    • Addressing underserved populations in autism spectrum research: An intersectional approach

      2022, Addressing Underserved Populations in Autism Spectrum Research: An Intersectional Approach
    • Old Age in Adults with ASD: Psychosocial Aspects—a Systematic Review

      2021, Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text