Elsevier

Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders

Volume 3, Issue 3, July–September 2009, Pages 619-629
Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders

Task interspersal and performance of matching tasks by preschoolers with autism

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2008.12.001Get rights and content

Abstract

The current study examined the effects of task interspersal on the performance of matching-to-sample tasks by three children with autism. A pre-baseline assessed each child's mastery level of a large body of matching stimuli. These matching tasks included matching identical and non-identical animals, numbers, letters, and shapes. Through this assessment mastered and non-mastered matching-to-sample stimuli were determined empirically. Following a baseline condition that presented only non-mastered stimuli in succession, treatment was introduced in a multiple-baseline design across children. During the treatment condition, trials with mastered stimuli were interspersed with trials with non-mastered stimuli. For all three children, the percentage of correct matching responses to the non-mastered stimuli increased systematically with the introduction of the interspersal procedure. Following treatment, a third condition was conducted that reduced the total number of reinforcers available per session to baseline levels. The data demonstrated that all three participants maintained treatment levels of correct responding during this third condition. Thus the increased reinforcement density during treatment was not needed for maintenance of correct responding. The discussion addresses additional control procedures that would be needed to evaluate the role of reinforcement density during treatment.

Section snippets

Subjects and setting

Three children with autism, Jose, Zach, and Nick participated. Jose and Zach were 5 while Nick was 3 years old. The children all attended a self-contained preschool for children with autism. The school features classrooms of 6 or 8 children taught by 3–4 staff members per room. Staff members typically use many ABA-based teaching procedures including discrete-trial and incidental teaching, shaping, and chaining.

The children were selected based on two criteria: consistent performance of sitting

Results

Fig. 1 presents the percentage of correct matching-to-sample responses to target (non-mastered) trials by the three participants across the three conditions. Overall, all three children demonstrated a systematic increase in percentage of correct responding with the introduction of the interspersal procedure in phase 2. This level of responding was maintained during the interspersal/low-density reinforcement (ILD) phase.

Jose started baseline responding correctly to 33% of the trials presented.

Discussion

Because there was a systematic increase in the percentage of correct responding to non-mastered matching-to-sample trials with the introduction of the interspersal procedure, one may conclude that the interspersal procedure caused the increase in the percentage of responses correct. As displayed in Fig. 1, the percent correct responding to non-mastered matching-to-sample tasks increased systematically when interspersal was introduced to each of the three children. This result is a clear

Acknowledgements

This project was completed in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the doctorate degree of the first author. The authors would like to thank the families who participated, and the research assistants who helped us collect data.

References (13)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (10)

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text