Elsevier

Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders

Volume 2, Issue 3, July–September 2008, Pages 447-455
Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders

Time perception in autism spectrum disorders

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2007.09.005Get rights and content

Abstract

Duration judgment has not been comprehensively examined in autism spectrum disorders (ASD), despite reports of perceptual idiosyncrasies in these individuals. Time estimation, production, and reproduction were tested in 25 individuals with ASD and 25 controls matched group-wise on age and IQ. Individuals with ASD performed comparably to matched controls in time estimation and production, but showed a tendency to outperform controls on a task of time reproduction. Time perception of large units is intact for children and adolescents with ASD. Time reproduction may represent a cognitive asset in ASD, likely reflecting strengths in eidetic-type imagery in which a pure recording of a stimulus is less affected by top-down modulation.

Section snippets

Participants

Twenty-five school-age (ages 9–18 years) children with ASD took part in the investigation (see Table 1 for age, sex, and estimated FSIQ breakdown). Exclusion criteria for the ASD group included any known co-morbid medical conditions, such as Fragile X syndrome, other genetic disorder, or neurological disorder (e.g., Tourette's syndrome) that may affect cognitive functioning. Participants with ASD were recruited from two schools specializing in the treatment and education of pupils with ASD and

Between and within group analyses

For all data, the first step involved examining the distribution and scatter of scores. Since sample sizes were not large, outliers may exert disproportionate influence on results. Taking a conservative approach, where there were outliers and extremes the analyses were run with and without the outlier(s) and/or extreme(s) included.

Overall, ratio scores did not differ significantly between groups with outliers included (see Table 2). This pattern remained true after removing outliers from the

Discussion

Individuals with ASD in the present study demonstrated intact time estimation and time production, and at least intact time reproduction. Indeed, there was some indication of superior time reproduction among individuals with ASD, compared with age and IQ-matched controls This finding fits with reports of faithful, unaltered memory traces for other types of stimuli in individuals with ASD, whether savant (Mottron, Belleville, Stip, & Morasse, 1998; Spitz & LaFontaine, 1973) or nonsavant (Toichi

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the students and teachers who so kindly gave their time and energy to assist in this research.

References (34)

  • A. Bonnel et al.

    Enhanced pitch sensitivity in individuals with autism: A signal detection analysis

    Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

    (2003)
  • S. Golombok et al.

    The UK Revision

  • F. Happé et al.

    The weak coherence account: Detail-focused cognitive style in autism spectrum disorders

    Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

    (2006)
  • P. Heaton et al.

    Autism and pitch processing: A precursor for savant musical ability

    Music Perception

    (1998)
  • P. Heaton et al.

    Annotation: The savant syndrome

    Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

    (2004)
  • L. Heavey

    Arithmetical savants

  • A.D. Hornstein et al.

    Research methodology in temporal perception

    Journal of Experimental Psychology

    (1969)
  • Cited by (52)

    • How did I get so late so soon? A review of time processing and management in autism

      2019, Behavioural Brain Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Autistic traits in a TD population, as measured by the Autistic Quotient [40] were found to be positively correlated to duration discrimination thresholds, extending the applicability of this finding to the broader autistic spectrum [41]. In contrast, some studies failed to report differences between ASD and control groups concerning interval timing [42–47]. Maister and al. suggested that these contradictions could be explained by the variety of measurement methods.

    • Diminished neural resources allocation to time processing in Autism Spectrum Disorders

      2018, NeuroImage: Clinical
      Citation Excerpt :

      In contrast with the described studies, Mostofsky et al. (2000) and Jones et al. (2009) found no differences between children and adolescents with ASD and their controls when using an auditory duration comparison task (below 1000 ms). Gil et al. (2012) found no group difference between ASD and TDC children in a time bisection task using durations between 0.5 and 16.62 s. Wallace and Happe (2008) even suggested that children with ASD can show superior performance to TDC children in a reproduction task using longer durations (2 to 45 s), and found no difference between groups in estimation and production tasks using the same durations. The latter results should be taken with caution as they were obtained with only 2 trials per duration and using a manual timing procedure.

    • Alexithymia, not autism, is associated with impaired interoception

      2016, Cortex
      Citation Excerpt :

      While both hyper- and hypo-sensitivity to interoceptive signals may be consistent with Quattrocki and Friston's (2014) interoception account, there are other factors which may have led to the inconsistent results concerning interoceptive ability in ASD. For example, the superior heartbeat counting performance demonstrated by the autistic children in Schauder et al.'s (2015) study was only demonstrated at the longest test durations, raising the possibility that their enhanced performance was due to non-specific factors, such as the increased attention to counting tasks or enhanced time perception demonstrated by children with autism (e.g., Wallace & Happé, 2008). Of most relevance to the present study, however, is the fact that previous studies do not account for the elevated levels of alexithymia in the autistic population.

    • Cognitive endophenotypes of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and intra-subject variability in patients with autism spectrum disorder

      2016, Biological Psychology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Among the candidate endophenotypes of ADHD are working memory (Martinussen, Hayden, Hogg-Johnson, & Tannock, 2005), response inhibition (Barkley, 1997; Nigg, Blaskey, Stawicki, & Sachek, 2004) and temporal processing (Toplak, Dockstader, & Tannock, 2006; Gooch, Snowling, & Hulme, 2011). All of these constructs have been assessed in patients with autism, yielding overall mixed results (e.g., Bhatara, Babikian, Laugeson, Tachdjian, & Sininger, 2013; Falter, Noereika, Wearden, & Bailey, 2012; Joseph, Steele, Meyer, & Tager-Flusberg, 2005; Kana, Keller, Minshew, & Just, 2007; Martin, Poirier, & Bowler, 2010; Ozonoff & Strayer, 2001; Steele, Minshew, Luna, & Sweeney, 2007; Wallace & Happé 2008). Importantly, most of the studies assessing functions in ASD patients that are considered as endophenotypes of ADHD did not consider comorbidity with ADHD, or, if considered, did not analyse their data according to these sub-groups.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text