Elsevier

Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders

Volume 1, Issue 4, October–December 2007, Pages 339-349
Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders

Relationship between motor skill impairment and severity in children with Asperger syndrome

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2006.12.003Get rights and content

Abstract

This study examined the correlation between severity and motor impairment in children with Asperger syndrome (AS). Children, ages 6–12 with AS (N = 51) and a control group of typical children (N = 56), were assessed using the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) and the Movement Assessment Battery For Children (MABC). A bivariate correlational design was used to compare the scores (Spearman rank correlational coefficient). Significant differences were seen between typical, mild to moderate and severe categories of SRS scores, based on the Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance by ranks (p < .05). Strong correlations were found between the MABC motor impairment levels and the SRS severity levels. This study adds a clearer understanding of the relationship between motor impairment and severity for children with AS. The degree of correlation indicates that motor skill impairment is a function of severity within AS.

Introduction

Motor skill impairment has been examined in numerous studies of children with Asperger Syndrome (AS). Delayed motor milestones and motor clumsiness are listed in the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Edition (ICD-10; World Health Organization, 1992) as associated, but not necessarily diagnostic features of AS, while the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR; American Psychiatric Association, 2000) does not include any type of motor problem in the diagnosis. Motor skill impairments have been found in 50–100% of participants in previous studies (Ghazuiddin & Butler, 1998; Ghazuiddin, Butler, Tsai, & Ghazuiddin, 1994; Gillberg, 1998, Green et al., 2002; Klin, Volkmar, Ciccetti, & Rourke, 1995). While occupational and physical therapists frequently address these motor problems in their interventions for children with AS, no study has investigated the relationship between motor impairment and severity with these children. Using a recently developed assessment of autistic impairment severity, the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS, Constantino & Gruber, 2005), with the widely used Movement Assessment Battery for Children (MABC, Henderson & Sugden, 1992), we sought to examine the relationship between these characteristics of children with AS.

Section snippets

Literature review

Diagnostic criteria for AS include impaired social interaction; restricted, repetitive, and stereotyped patterns of behavior, interests, and activities; and lack of delay in language or cognitive development. AS is a diagnostic category under the larger group of Pervasive Developmental Disorders (PDD) in the ICD-10 (WHO, 1992) and is known as Asperger's disorder in the DSM-IV-TR (APA, 2000). The United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (

Research design and methodology

This study used a bivariate correlational research design (Spearman rank correlational coefficient). It examined the relationship between severity levels and motor impairment levels in children between age 6 and 12 in two groups, those diagnosed with AS and a control group. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the motor impairment levels and severity. Research procedures to assure the safety and privacy of the subjects and to prevent unnecessary risk for them were included as part of

Results

Analysis included examination of means and standard deviations of scores for overall motor skills impairment levels, manual dexterity impairment levels, ball skills impairment levels, and static and dynamic balance impairment levels of the subjects with AS. Overall impairment scores consisted of 65% in the category of definite impairment, 25% with borderline impairment, and the remaining 10% with no impairment. All control group subjects were in the no impairment category. Impairment levels in

Discussion

Eighty-nine percent of the subjects with AS scored at least one standard deviation below the norm in overall motor skills. Sixty-five percent scored below the fifth percentile (two standard deviations below the norm) on the MABC, which would qualify them as having the comorbid condition of SDD-MF (Spagna et al., 2000). The motor skill results were generally consistent with other studies of motor skills in children with AS (Ghazuiddin & Butler, 1998; Ghazuiddin et al., 1994, Gillberg, 1989,

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to Kate Graver, Jessica Reinken, Andrea Runzi, Mary Crouch, and Nicolle Drew for their tireless commitment to the completion of the data collection. They would like to thank Betty Schaefer, Cathy Crouch, Valerie Harbolovic; Sonia O’Donnell, Lynda Cordry, Tami Morrissey, Deb Dolan, Barb Eckels, Nancy Vanderweile Milligan, Jackie Kilburn, Lois Ehrhard, Joan Smith, Tina Kreummel, Nancy Buchholz, Lori Thompson, Marla Johnson, and Lou Pruitt for their help in finding

References (36)

  • J.N. Constantino et al.

    Validation of a brief quantitative measure of autistic traits: Comparison of the Social Responsiveness Scale with the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised

    Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

    (2003)
  • J.N. Constantino et al.

    Autistic traits in the general population: A twin study

    Archives of General Psychiatry

    (2003)
  • S. Crawford et al.

    Identifying developmental coordination disorder: Consistency between tests

    Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics

    (2001)
  • R. Croce et al.

    Reliability and concurrent validity of the movement assessment battery for children

    Perceptual and Motor Skills

    (2001)
  • W. Dunn

    Sensory Profile

    (1999)
  • S. Ehlers et al.

    The epidemiology of Asperger syndrome: A total population study

    Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

    (1993)
  • I. Engström et al.

    Psychosocial functioning in a group of Swedish adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism

    Autism

    (2003)
  • M. Ghazuiddin et al.

    Clumsiness in autism & AS: A further report

    Journal of Intellectual Disability Research

    (1998)
  • Cited by (75)

    • Methodological considerations in the use of standardized motor assessment tools for children with autism spectrum disorder: A scoping review

      2022, Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders
      Citation Excerpt :

      Among the 43 that used the BOT, 19 (44%) used the short version (BOT-SF) or a combination of BOT-SF and selected subtests. The complementary part of the M-ABC, the Motor Competence Checklist (MCC), was used in two studies, one for participants with ASD (Belaire et al., 2020) and as the sole component of the motor assessment for the control group in the other (Hilton et al., 2007). The qualitative observational part of the tool was not reported.

    • Fundamental movement skills in children with autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review

      2020, Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders
      Citation Excerpt :

      The former approach, which is also referred to as norm-referenced assessment, measures the outcome of performance (e.g., time taken to complete a task, number of successful trials completed, or number of errors made), whereas the latter, also known as criterion-referenced assessment, focuses mainly on the technique used to perform a particular movement skill (e.g., whether or not the child extends his/her arms to catch a ball) (for details of these assessment batteries, see Appendix A). Both product and process-oriented assessment batteries have been found to adequately capture the multifaceted nature of FMS and are considered to be highly reliable in distinguishing the movement skills performance between children with and without FMS impairments (for review see Cools, De Martelaer, Samaey, & Andries, 2011; Wiart & Darrah, 2001; Yoon, Scott, Hill, Levitt, & Lambert, 2006), resulting in their use in several studies examining FMS in children with ASD (Berkeley, Zittel, Pitney, & Nichols, 2001; Breslin & Rudisill, 2011; Ghaziuddin & Butler, 1998; Green et al., 2002, 2009; Hauck & Dewey, 2001; Hilton et al., 2007; Iwanaga, Kawasaki, & Tsuchida, 2000; Jasmin et al., 2009; Landa & Garrett-Mayer, 2006; Liu, Hamilton, Davis, & ElGarhy, 2014; Liu, Breslin, & ElGarhy, 2017; Lloyd, MacDonald, & Lord, 2013; MacDonald et al., 2014; Mache & Todd, 2016; Matson, Mahan, Fodstad, Hess, & Neal, 2010; Pan, Tsai, & Chu, 2009; Paquet, Olliac, Bouvard, Golse, & Vaivre-Douret, 2016; Provost, Lopez, & Heimerl, 2006; Provost, Heimerl, & Lopez, 2007; Staples & Reid, 2010; Van Waelvelde, Oostra, Dewitte, Van Den Broeck, & Jongmans, 2010; Whyatt & Craig, 2012; Zachor, Ilanit, & Itzchak, 2010). The current systematic review aims to summarize and interpret the above studies in order to have a deeper understanding of actual performance of fundamental movement skills in children with ASD.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This study was started as part of the dissertation research completed by the first author in the pursuit of her doctor of philosophy degree in occupational therapy.

    View full text