Factor structure of the Behavior Flexibility Rating Scale (BFRS)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2006.07.005Get rights and content

Abstract

The Behavior Flexibility Rating Scale (BFRS) is designed to assess insistence on sameness or lack of behavioral flexibility, which is often associated with autism and other developmental disabilities. This study was designed to assess the factor structure of this scale for a sample of 968 individuals with autism, Asperger's syndrome, and Down syndrome. To establish factorial validity, an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted with half of the sample, with a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) conducted with the remaining cases to cross-validate the model obtained with the EFA. The factor analyses supported the presence of two factors—Interruption/Disruption and Position/Location. However, further analysis suggested the presence of a third factor, Interpersonal Mishaps, for the Asperger's syndrome group.

Introduction

The obsessive insistence on sameness and resistance to change have been key features of autism ever since Kanner's first descriptive account (Kanner, 1943). Individuals with autism appear to have great difficulty with adjusting to any unexpected physical or procedural changes in their environment (Lewis & Bodfish, 1998; Prior & MacMillan, 1973; Wahlberg & Jordan, 2001). This ‘insistence on sameness’ or ‘resistance to change’ is often included within the broader umbrella of repetitive behaviors, for example, the stereotyped manipulation of objects, self-injury, motor stereotypies, and dyskinesias (Lewis & Bodfish, 1998; Turner, 1999). Wahlberg and Jordan (2001) argued that the obsessive insistence on sameness seen in individuals with autism represents a lack of behavioral flexibility. That is the individual shows a lack of ability to adjust their behavior and tolerate or cope with unpredictable changes in the environment. While descriptions of this key feature of autism abound, little empirical work has been done in relation to the assessment of behavioral flexibility in individuals with autism.

One notable exception is the Sameness Questionnaire developed by Prior and MacMillan (1973). This questionnaire included 28 items that described limited play patterns, intense object attachments, unusual preoccupations, and rigid routines. In addition, a few items in this questionnaire focused specifically on the rating of insistence on sameness and resistance to change. Correlational analysis showed that eight of the items successfully discriminated between autistic individuals—who were diagnosed using Rimland's Check List E-2, (1971), and non-autistic individuals. Objections to interruptions and an insistence on objects being in the same place were two of the most discriminating items. Although the authors did not report any factorial analysis, their correlational analysis suggest that these two specific areas of behavioral flexibility may be worthy of additional investigation. The behavior flexibility rating scale (BFRS) was developed as a potential measure of behavioral flexibility in children with autism and other developmental disabilities (Green et al., in press). An important aspect of scale development is to determine its potential usefulness in informing practitioners as they seek to develop intervention procedures that target specific aspects of a behavior. In order to determine whether behavioral flexibility is a one dimensional or multi-dimensional construct this paper was designed to assess the factor structure of this newly developed scale.

Section snippets

Scale construction

A systematic review of literature that included descriptions of the insistence on sameness and/or resistance to change in individuals with autism was conducted in order to select items for the scale (Kanner, 1943, Prior and MacMillan, 1973; Rutter, 1978, Wahlberg and Jordan, 2001). Items were selected that described any general situations related to changed routines that may prove problematic for the individual. The scale items covered five areas: (a) an item is unavailable or may have been

Results

Of the 968 participants who responded to the survey, 790 completed all of the 15 BFRS items. Further, a missing values analysis indicated that the participants who did not respond to a given item scored significantly different, on average, on some other items than did those who responded to that given item. Given the extent and pattern of missing data, missing values were imputed using the EM algorithm, which is considered an acceptable imputation method (e.g., Keith, 2006, Kline, 2005). This

Discussion

Over the last few decades a considerable amount of research has explored the aetiology, assessment, and treatment of autism (Matson, 1994, Rutter and Schopler, 1978), however effective procedures for addressing certain core features of autism, such as the characteristic resistance to change or insistence on sameness, have yet to be developed and empirically validated. This is a significant gap in the literature because the lack of behavioural flexibility is considered one of the more pervasive

References (18)

  • V.A. Green et al.

    Internet survey of treatments used by parents of children with autism

    Research in Developmental Disabilities

    (2006)
  • J.S. Boudrias et al.

    Testing the structure of psychological empowerment: Does gender make a difference?

    Educational and Psychological Measurement

    (2004)
  • B.M. Byrne

    Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming

    (1998)
  • H.C.W. de Vet et al.

    Are factor analytic techniques used appropriately in the validation of health status questionnaires? A systematic review on the quality of factor analysis of the SF-36

    Quality of Life Research

    (2005)
  • J.K. Ford et al.

    The application of exploratory factor analysis in applied psychology: A critical review and analysis

    Personnel Psychology

    (1986)
  • D.W. Gerbing et al.

    Viability of exploratory factor analysis as a precursor to confirmatory factor analysis

    Structural Equation Modeling

    (1996)
  • Green, V. A., Sigafoos, J., Pituch, K., Itchon, J., O’Reilly, M., & Lancioni, G. E. (in press). Assessing behavioral...
  • L. Kanner

    Autistic disturbances of affective contact

    Nervous Child

    (1943)
  • T.Z. Keith

    Multiple regression and beyond

    (2006)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text